局部晚期上尿路上皮癌患者辅助化疗在现实临床实践中的影响。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jun Teishima, Junichiro Hirata, Takuya Toge, Riku Uematsu, Yoshie Mita, Takahiko Yoshii, Ichiro Nakamura
{"title":"局部晚期上尿路上皮癌患者辅助化疗在现实临床实践中的影响。","authors":"Jun Teishima, Junichiro Hirata, Takuya Toge, Riku Uematsu, Yoshie Mita, Takahiko Yoshii, Ichiro Nakamura","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) using regimens including gemcitabine and platinum on the improvement of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has been recently demonstrated. This study aimed to determine the utility of ACT for patients with locally advanced UTUC in real-world clinical practice and the differences in efficacy among regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 206 UTUC patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy, 78 were pathologically diagnosed as T3 or higher and/or had pathologically identified lymph node metastasis; 36 in the ACT group and 42 in the non-ACT group were evaluated for patient background, recurrence, and prognosis. In the ACT group, either cisplatin (GC group, 12 cases) or carboplatin (GCa group, 24 cases) was administered as the platinum agent to be combined with gemcitabine.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The median patient age in the ACT group and that in the non-ACT group was 71 and 79 years, respectively (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between these two groups in terms of other patient parameters. The two- and five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS ) and the two- and five-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the ACT group were 81.7%, 66.0%, 60.6%, and 56.6%, respectively, and for the non-ACT group were 68.4%, 40.5%, 42.8%, and 29.3%, respectively (p=0.0399 for CSS and p=0.0814 for DFS). There was no significant difference in CSS and DFS between the GC group and GCa group (p=0.9846 and p=0.9389, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In real-world clinical practice in Japan, UTUC patients who receive ACT after radical nephroureterectomy may be expected to have better cancer control than those who do not receive ACT.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10766338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma in real-world clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Teishima, Junichiro Hirata, Takuya Toge, Riku Uematsu, Yoshie Mita, Takahiko Yoshii, Ichiro Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.8438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) using regimens including gemcitabine and platinum on the improvement of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has been recently demonstrated. This study aimed to determine the utility of ACT for patients with locally advanced UTUC in real-world clinical practice and the differences in efficacy among regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 206 UTUC patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy, 78 were pathologically diagnosed as T3 or higher and/or had pathologically identified lymph node metastasis; 36 in the ACT group and 42 in the non-ACT group were evaluated for patient background, recurrence, and prognosis. In the ACT group, either cisplatin (GC group, 12 cases) or carboplatin (GCa group, 24 cases) was administered as the platinum agent to be combined with gemcitabine.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The median patient age in the ACT group and that in the non-ACT group was 71 and 79 years, respectively (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between these two groups in terms of other patient parameters. The two- and five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS ) and the two- and five-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the ACT group were 81.7%, 66.0%, 60.6%, and 56.6%, respectively, and for the non-ACT group were 68.4%, 40.5%, 42.8%, and 29.3%, respectively (p=0.0399 for CSS and p=0.0814 for DFS). There was no significant difference in CSS and DFS between the GC group and GCa group (p=0.9846 and p=0.9389, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In real-world clinical practice in Japan, UTUC patients who receive ACT after radical nephroureterectomy may be expected to have better cancer control than those who do not receive ACT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10766338/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8438\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:最近证实了使用吉西他滨和铂等方案的辅助化疗(ACT)对改善局部晚期上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者预后的影响。本研究旨在确定ACT在现实世界临床实践中对局部晚期UTUC患者的效用,以及不同方案的疗效差异。方法:在206例接受根治性肾输尿管切除术的UTUC患者中,78例经病理诊断为T3或T3以上和/或经病理证实有淋巴结转移;对ACT组36例和非ACT组42例的患者背景、复发和预后进行评估。在ACT组中,顺铂(GC组,12例)或卡铂(GCa组,24例)作为铂剂与吉西他滨联合给药。结果:ACT组和非ACT组的中位患者年龄分别为71岁和79岁(P结论:在日本的现实临床实践中,肾输尿管根治术后接受ACT的UTUC患者可能比未接受ACT的患者更好地控制癌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma in real-world clinical practice.

Introduction: The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) using regimens including gemcitabine and platinum on the improvement of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has been recently demonstrated. This study aimed to determine the utility of ACT for patients with locally advanced UTUC in real-world clinical practice and the differences in efficacy among regimens.

Methods: Of 206 UTUC patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy, 78 were pathologically diagnosed as T3 or higher and/or had pathologically identified lymph node metastasis; 36 in the ACT group and 42 in the non-ACT group were evaluated for patient background, recurrence, and prognosis. In the ACT group, either cisplatin (GC group, 12 cases) or carboplatin (GCa group, 24 cases) was administered as the platinum agent to be combined with gemcitabine.

Result: The median patient age in the ACT group and that in the non-ACT group was 71 and 79 years, respectively (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between these two groups in terms of other patient parameters. The two- and five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS ) and the two- and five-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the ACT group were 81.7%, 66.0%, 60.6%, and 56.6%, respectively, and for the non-ACT group were 68.4%, 40.5%, 42.8%, and 29.3%, respectively (p=0.0399 for CSS and p=0.0814 for DFS). There was no significant difference in CSS and DFS between the GC group and GCa group (p=0.9846 and p=0.9389, respectively).

Conclusions: In real-world clinical practice in Japan, UTUC patients who receive ACT after radical nephroureterectomy may be expected to have better cancer control than those who do not receive ACT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信