Kristen G Quigley, Dustin Hopfe, Madison Fenner, Philip Pavilionis, Vincentia Owusu-Amankonah, Arthur Islas, Nicholas G Murray
{"title":"使用仪器式护具对护帽头部撞击运动学的初步检查。","authors":"Kristen G Quigley, Dustin Hopfe, Madison Fenner, Philip Pavilionis, Vincentia Owusu-Amankonah, Arthur Islas, Nicholas G Murray","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0136.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Guardian Caps (GCs) are currently the most popular external helmet add-on designed to reduce the magnitude of head impacts experienced by American football players. Guardian Caps have been endorsed by influential professional organizations; however, few studies evaluating their efficiency are publicly available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present preliminary on-field head kinematics data for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I American football players using instrumented mouthguards through closely matched preseason workouts with and without GCs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The 2022 American football preseason.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Twenty-five male NCAA Division I student-athletes participating in American football completed some portion of the 6 workouts included in this study. Of the 25 participants, 7 completed all 6 workouts using their instrumented mouthguards.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak angular acceleration (PAA), and total impacts were collected via instrumented mouthguards during 3 preseason workouts using traditional helmets (TRAD condition) and 3 using a TRAD and GCs (GC condition). The TRAD and GC values for PLA, PAA, and total impacts were evaluated using analyses of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference was present between the collapsed mean values for the entire sample between the TRAD and GC conditions for PLA (TRAD = 16.3g ± 2.0g, GC = 17.2g ± 3.3g, P = .20), PAA (TRAD = 992.1 ± 209.2 rad/s2, GC = 1029.4 ± 261.1 rad/s2, P = .51), or the total number of impacts (TRAD = 9.3 ± 4.7, GC = 9.7 ± 5.7, P = .72). Similarly, no difference was observed between the TRAD and GC conditions for PLA (TRAD = 16.1g ± 1.2g, GC = 17.2g ± 2.79g, P = .32), PAA (TRAD = 951.2 ± 95.4 rad/s2, GC = 1038.0 ± 166.8 rad/s2, P = .29), or total impacts (TRAD = 9.6 ± 4.2, GC = 9.7 ± 5.04, P = .32) between sessions for the 7 players who completed all 6 workouts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggested no difference in head kinematics data (PLA, PAA, and total impacts) when GCs were worn. Therefore, GCs may not be effective in reducing the magnitude of head impacts experienced by NCAA Division I American football players.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":"594-599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Examination of Guardian Cap Head Impact Kinematics Using Instrumented Mouthguards.\",\"authors\":\"Kristen G Quigley, Dustin Hopfe, Madison Fenner, Philip Pavilionis, Vincentia Owusu-Amankonah, Arthur Islas, Nicholas G Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0136.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Guardian Caps (GCs) are currently the most popular external helmet add-on designed to reduce the magnitude of head impacts experienced by American football players. Guardian Caps have been endorsed by influential professional organizations; however, few studies evaluating their efficiency are publicly available.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present preliminary on-field head kinematics data for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I American football players using instrumented mouthguards through closely matched preseason workouts with and without GCs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The 2022 American football preseason.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Twenty-five male NCAA Division I student-athletes participating in American football completed some portion of the 6 workouts included in this study. Of the 25 participants, 7 completed all 6 workouts using their instrumented mouthguards.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak angular acceleration (PAA), and total impacts were collected via instrumented mouthguards during 3 preseason workouts using traditional helmets (TRAD condition) and 3 using a TRAD and GCs (GC condition). The TRAD and GC values for PLA, PAA, and total impacts were evaluated using analyses of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference was present between the collapsed mean values for the entire sample between the TRAD and GC conditions for PLA (TRAD = 16.3g ± 2.0g, GC = 17.2g ± 3.3g, P = .20), PAA (TRAD = 992.1 ± 209.2 rad/s2, GC = 1029.4 ± 261.1 rad/s2, P = .51), or the total number of impacts (TRAD = 9.3 ± 4.7, GC = 9.7 ± 5.7, P = .72). Similarly, no difference was observed between the TRAD and GC conditions for PLA (TRAD = 16.1g ± 1.2g, GC = 17.2g ± 2.79g, P = .32), PAA (TRAD = 951.2 ± 95.4 rad/s2, GC = 1038.0 ± 166.8 rad/s2, P = .29), or total impacts (TRAD = 9.6 ± 4.2, GC = 9.7 ± 5.04, P = .32) between sessions for the 7 players who completed all 6 workouts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggested no difference in head kinematics data (PLA, PAA, and total impacts) when GCs were worn. Therefore, GCs may not be effective in reducing the magnitude of head impacts experienced by NCAA Division I American football players.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"594-599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220776/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0136.23\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0136.23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preliminary Examination of Guardian Cap Head Impact Kinematics Using Instrumented Mouthguards.
Context: Guardian Caps (GCs) are currently the most popular external helmet add-on designed to reduce the magnitude of head impacts experienced by American football players. Guardian Caps have been endorsed by influential professional organizations; however, few studies evaluating their efficiency are publicly available.
Objective: To present preliminary on-field head kinematics data for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I American football players using instrumented mouthguards through closely matched preseason workouts with and without GCs.
Design: Case series.
Setting: The 2022 American football preseason.
Patients or other participants: Twenty-five male NCAA Division I student-athletes participating in American football completed some portion of the 6 workouts included in this study. Of the 25 participants, 7 completed all 6 workouts using their instrumented mouthguards.
Main outcome measure(s): Peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak angular acceleration (PAA), and total impacts were collected via instrumented mouthguards during 3 preseason workouts using traditional helmets (TRAD condition) and 3 using a TRAD and GCs (GC condition). The TRAD and GC values for PLA, PAA, and total impacts were evaluated using analyses of variance.
Results: No difference was present between the collapsed mean values for the entire sample between the TRAD and GC conditions for PLA (TRAD = 16.3g ± 2.0g, GC = 17.2g ± 3.3g, P = .20), PAA (TRAD = 992.1 ± 209.2 rad/s2, GC = 1029.4 ± 261.1 rad/s2, P = .51), or the total number of impacts (TRAD = 9.3 ± 4.7, GC = 9.7 ± 5.7, P = .72). Similarly, no difference was observed between the TRAD and GC conditions for PLA (TRAD = 16.1g ± 1.2g, GC = 17.2g ± 2.79g, P = .32), PAA (TRAD = 951.2 ± 95.4 rad/s2, GC = 1038.0 ± 166.8 rad/s2, P = .29), or total impacts (TRAD = 9.6 ± 4.2, GC = 9.7 ± 5.04, P = .32) between sessions for the 7 players who completed all 6 workouts.
Conclusions: These data suggested no difference in head kinematics data (PLA, PAA, and total impacts) when GCs were worn. Therefore, GCs may not be effective in reducing the magnitude of head impacts experienced by NCAA Division I American football players.
期刊介绍：
The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries.
The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
