将治疗景观与建筑连接起来。基于国际经验的医疗基础设施设计策略。

Karla Johanna Cardoso Arevalo, Andrea Rebecchi, Monica Botta, Marco Gola, Stefano Capolongo
{"title":"将治疗景观与建筑连接起来。基于国际经验的医疗基础设施设计策略。","authors":"Karla Johanna Cardoso Arevalo,&nbsp;Andrea Rebecchi,&nbsp;Monica Botta,&nbsp;Marco Gola,&nbsp;Stefano Capolongo","doi":"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>in Italy, many cases studies of therapeutic green spaces are built into healthcare infrastructures, but only some of these follow the principles of healing gardens. Scientific literature and international case studies offer many contributions of evidence relating to how therapeutic green spaces can support traditional treatments. The paper analyze the relationship between indoor and outdoor spaces and healing gardens' features; the main research questions were: \"Can we synthetize experience-based design strategies for therapeutic green spaces and healing gardens? How can we prioritize the most relevant ones for the healthcare infrastructures?\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Research Method is divided into three different steps: 1st case studies' selection; 2nd case studies' analysis, and 3rd quali-quantitative comparative matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ten case studies were identifiedfour of them have the therapeutic green space on the ground floor,despite of the other six having the healing garden on the rooftop.The best experience-based design strategies for the therapeutic green spaces or healing gardens development were identified from the previous comparison matrix, and divided into A.Safety, Security and Privacy; B.Accessibility; C.Physical and Emotional Comfort; D.Positive distraction; E.Engagement with Nature; F.Maintenance and Aesthetics; and G.Sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results obtained from the comparative matrix are qualitative and quantitative design elements in terms of type of element / space, percentage, perimeter, area, number, materiality, shape, color, among others. The quali-quantitative matrix is a useful and practical tool that allows the designer to have a base of design guidelines that can be later applied to the proposal of new therapeutic gardens.</p>","PeriodicalId":93849,"journal":{"name":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","volume":"94 S3","pages":"e2023213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging therapeutic landscapes to architecture. International experience-based design strategies for healthcare infrastructures.\",\"authors\":\"Karla Johanna Cardoso Arevalo,&nbsp;Andrea Rebecchi,&nbsp;Monica Botta,&nbsp;Marco Gola,&nbsp;Stefano Capolongo\",\"doi\":\"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>in Italy, many cases studies of therapeutic green spaces are built into healthcare infrastructures, but only some of these follow the principles of healing gardens. Scientific literature and international case studies offer many contributions of evidence relating to how therapeutic green spaces can support traditional treatments. The paper analyze the relationship between indoor and outdoor spaces and healing gardens' features; the main research questions were: \\\"Can we synthetize experience-based design strategies for therapeutic green spaces and healing gardens? How can we prioritize the most relevant ones for the healthcare infrastructures?\\\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Research Method is divided into three different steps: 1st case studies' selection; 2nd case studies' analysis, and 3rd quali-quantitative comparative matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ten case studies were identifiedfour of them have the therapeutic green space on the ground floor,despite of the other six having the healing garden on the rooftop.The best experience-based design strategies for the therapeutic green spaces or healing gardens development were identified from the previous comparison matrix, and divided into A.Safety, Security and Privacy; B.Accessibility; C.Physical and Emotional Comfort; D.Positive distraction; E.Engagement with Nature; F.Maintenance and Aesthetics; and G.Sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results obtained from the comparative matrix are qualitative and quantitative design elements in terms of type of element / space, percentage, perimeter, area, number, materiality, shape, color, among others. The quali-quantitative matrix is a useful and practical tool that allows the designer to have a base of design guidelines that can be later applied to the proposal of new therapeutic gardens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis\",\"volume\":\"94 S3\",\"pages\":\"e2023213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在意大利,许多治疗性绿地的案例研究都建立在医疗基础设施中,但只有一些遵循了治疗花园的原则。科学文献和国际案例研究为治疗性绿地如何支持传统治疗提供了许多证据。分析了室内外空间与疗养园特色的关系;主要研究问题是:“我们能否综合基于体验的治疗绿地和疗养花园设计策略?我们如何优先考虑与医疗基础设施最相关的策略?”方法:研究方法分为三个不同的步骤:第一个案例研究的选择;第二个案例分析,第三个quali定量比较矩阵。结果:确定了10个案例研究,其中4个在一楼有治疗绿地,而其他6个在屋顶有治疗花园。从之前的比较矩阵中确定了治疗性绿地或治疗花园开发的最佳体验设计策略,并将其分为A.安全、安保和隐私;B.可达性;C.身体和情感上的舒适;D.积极分散注意力;E.与自然互动;F.维护和美观;和G.可持续性。结论:从比较矩阵中获得的结果是从元素/空间类型、百分比、周长、面积、数量、物质性、形状、颜色等方面的定性和定量设计元素。quali定量矩阵是一种有用且实用的工具,它使设计师能够掌握设计指南的基础,这些指南可以稍后应用于新的治疗花园的提案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging therapeutic landscapes to architecture. International experience-based design strategies for healthcare infrastructures.

Background and aim: in Italy, many cases studies of therapeutic green spaces are built into healthcare infrastructures, but only some of these follow the principles of healing gardens. Scientific literature and international case studies offer many contributions of evidence relating to how therapeutic green spaces can support traditional treatments. The paper analyze the relationship between indoor and outdoor spaces and healing gardens' features; the main research questions were: "Can we synthetize experience-based design strategies for therapeutic green spaces and healing gardens? How can we prioritize the most relevant ones for the healthcare infrastructures?"

Methods: Research Method is divided into three different steps: 1st case studies' selection; 2nd case studies' analysis, and 3rd quali-quantitative comparative matrix.

Results: ten case studies were identifiedfour of them have the therapeutic green space on the ground floor,despite of the other six having the healing garden on the rooftop.The best experience-based design strategies for the therapeutic green spaces or healing gardens development were identified from the previous comparison matrix, and divided into A.Safety, Security and Privacy; B.Accessibility; C.Physical and Emotional Comfort; D.Positive distraction; E.Engagement with Nature; F.Maintenance and Aesthetics; and G.Sustainability.

Conclusions: The results obtained from the comparative matrix are qualitative and quantitative design elements in terms of type of element / space, percentage, perimeter, area, number, materiality, shape, color, among others. The quali-quantitative matrix is a useful and practical tool that allows the designer to have a base of design guidelines that can be later applied to the proposal of new therapeutic gardens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信