双能量x射线内脏脂肪组织测量的标准化,用于临床成像系统之间的比较。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1002/oby.23885
Jonathan P. Bennett, Bo Fan, En Liu, Leila Kazemi, Xian-Ping Wu, Hou-De Zhou, Ying Lu, John A. Shepherd
{"title":"双能量x射线内脏脂肪组织测量的标准化,用于临床成像系统之间的比较。","authors":"Jonathan P. Bennett,&nbsp;Bo Fan,&nbsp;En Liu,&nbsp;Leila Kazemi,&nbsp;Xian-Ping Wu,&nbsp;Hou-De Zhou,&nbsp;Ying Lu,&nbsp;John A. Shepherd","doi":"10.1002/oby.23885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Excess visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is a major risk factor for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and clinical guidelines have been proposed to define VAT levels associated with increased risk. The aim was to standardize VAT measures between two dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) manufacturers who provide different VAT estimates to support standardization of measures across imaging modalities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Scans from 114 individuals (ages 18–81 years) on GE HealthCare (GEHC) and Hologic DXA systems were compared via Deming regression to standardize VAT between the two systems, validated in a separate sample (<i>n</i> = 15), with κ statistics to assess agreement of VAT measurements for classifying patients into risk categories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The GEHC and Hologic VAT measures were highly correlated and validated in the separate data set (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97). VAT area measures substantially agreed for metabolic risk classification (weighted κ = 0.76) with no significant differences in the population mean values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>VAT measures can be estimated from GEHC and Hologic scans that classify individuals in a substantially similar way into metabolic risk categories, and systematic bias between the measures can be removed using simple regression equations. These findings allow for DXA VAT measures to be used in complement to other imaging modalities, regardless of whether scans used GEHC or Hologic systems.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"31 12","pages":"2936-2946"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization of dual-energy x-ray visceral adipose tissue measures for comparison across clinical imaging systems\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan P. Bennett,&nbsp;Bo Fan,&nbsp;En Liu,&nbsp;Leila Kazemi,&nbsp;Xian-Ping Wu,&nbsp;Hou-De Zhou,&nbsp;Ying Lu,&nbsp;John A. Shepherd\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oby.23885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Excess visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is a major risk factor for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and clinical guidelines have been proposed to define VAT levels associated with increased risk. The aim was to standardize VAT measures between two dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) manufacturers who provide different VAT estimates to support standardization of measures across imaging modalities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Scans from 114 individuals (ages 18–81 years) on GE HealthCare (GEHC) and Hologic DXA systems were compared via Deming regression to standardize VAT between the two systems, validated in a separate sample (<i>n</i> = 15), with κ statistics to assess agreement of VAT measurements for classifying patients into risk categories.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The GEHC and Hologic VAT measures were highly correlated and validated in the separate data set (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97). VAT area measures substantially agreed for metabolic risk classification (weighted κ = 0.76) with no significant differences in the population mean values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>VAT measures can be estimated from GEHC and Hologic scans that classify individuals in a substantially similar way into metabolic risk categories, and systematic bias between the measures can be removed using simple regression equations. These findings allow for DXA VAT measures to be used in complement to other imaging modalities, regardless of whether scans used GEHC or Hologic systems.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity\",\"volume\":\"31 12\",\"pages\":\"2936-2946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.23885\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.23885","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:内脏脂肪组织过多(VAT)是代谢综合征(MetS)的主要危险因素,已提出临床指南来定义与风险增加相关的VAT水平。目的是使两个双能x射线吸收仪(DXA)制造商之间的增值税措施标准化,这两个制造商提供不同的增值税估计,以支持成像模式措施的标准化。方法:对114名患者(年龄18-81岁)进行扫描 年)在GE HealthCare(GEHC)和Hologic DXA系统上进行比较,以标准化两个系统之间的增值税,并在单独的样本中进行验证(n = 15) ,用κ统计来评估将患者分类为风险类别的增值税测量的一致性。结果:GEHC和Hologic增值税指标高度相关,并在单独的数据集中得到验证(r2 = 0.97)。代谢风险分类的增值税区域指标基本一致(加权κ = 0.76),群体平均值无显著差异。结论:可以从GEHC和Hologic扫描中估计VAT测量值,这些扫描以基本相似的方式将个体分类为代谢风险类别,并且可以使用简单的回归方程消除测量值之间的系统偏差。这些发现允许DXA-VAT测量用于补充其他成像模式,无论扫描是使用GEHC还是Hologic系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardization of dual-energy x-ray visceral adipose tissue measures for comparison across clinical imaging systems

Objective

Excess visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is a major risk factor for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and clinical guidelines have been proposed to define VAT levels associated with increased risk. The aim was to standardize VAT measures between two dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) manufacturers who provide different VAT estimates to support standardization of measures across imaging modalities.

Methods

Scans from 114 individuals (ages 18–81 years) on GE HealthCare (GEHC) and Hologic DXA systems were compared via Deming regression to standardize VAT between the two systems, validated in a separate sample (n = 15), with κ statistics to assess agreement of VAT measurements for classifying patients into risk categories.

Results

The GEHC and Hologic VAT measures were highly correlated and validated in the separate data set (r2 = 0.97). VAT area measures substantially agreed for metabolic risk classification (weighted κ = 0.76) with no significant differences in the population mean values.

Conclusions

VAT measures can be estimated from GEHC and Hologic scans that classify individuals in a substantially similar way into metabolic risk categories, and systematic bias between the measures can be removed using simple regression equations. These findings allow for DXA VAT measures to be used in complement to other imaging modalities, regardless of whether scans used GEHC or Hologic systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信