开放性远端修复术能安全地用于所有A型急性主动脉夹层患者吗?

Georgi Manchev, Vassil Gegouskov, Vladimir Kornovski, Georgi Yankov, Valya Goranovska, Vicktoria Ilieva, Vicktoria Petrova
{"title":"开放性远端修复术能安全地用于所有A型急性主动脉夹层患者吗?","authors":"Georgi Manchev, Vassil Gegouskov, Vladimir Kornovski, Georgi Yankov, Valya Goranovska, Vicktoria Ilieva, Vicktoria Petrova","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The distal suture line during aortic dissection repair can be performed by a closed technique or by an open technique. This study presents a retrospective comparison of both methods regarding their postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>120 patients who underwent surgery for acute aortic dissection type A were divided into two groups. In group A (n = 81), open distal anastomosis was performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion. In group B (n = 39), distal anastomosis was performed with the aorta cross-clamped under mildly hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Primary outcomes were operative mortality, neurologic morbidity, and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital mortality (17.3% for the open group vs. 12.8% for the closed group, p = 0.53), permanent neurologic dysfunction (8.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 1.0), and temporary neurologic dysfunction (31.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.298) were not significantly different between groups. No significant difference in actuarial 5- and 10-year survival was observed (88% vs. 86% and 53 vs. 73%, respectively, p = 0.396). After propensity-score adjustment, the technique of distal aortic repair was not found to be a predictor of the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that the open repair can be used in most if not all cases of surgical repair of type A acute aortic dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10902668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Open Distal Repair Be Safely Used in All Patients with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection?\",\"authors\":\"Georgi Manchev, Vassil Gegouskov, Vladimir Kornovski, Georgi Yankov, Valya Goranovska, Vicktoria Ilieva, Vicktoria Petrova\",\"doi\":\"10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The distal suture line during aortic dissection repair can be performed by a closed technique or by an open technique. This study presents a retrospective comparison of both methods regarding their postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>120 patients who underwent surgery for acute aortic dissection type A were divided into two groups. In group A (n = 81), open distal anastomosis was performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion. In group B (n = 39), distal anastomosis was performed with the aorta cross-clamped under mildly hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Primary outcomes were operative mortality, neurologic morbidity, and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital mortality (17.3% for the open group vs. 12.8% for the closed group, p = 0.53), permanent neurologic dysfunction (8.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 1.0), and temporary neurologic dysfunction (31.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.298) were not significantly different between groups. No significant difference in actuarial 5- and 10-year survival was observed (88% vs. 86% and 53 vs. 73%, respectively, p = 0.396). After propensity-score adjustment, the technique of distal aortic repair was not found to be a predictor of the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that the open repair can be used in most if not all cases of surgical repair of type A acute aortic dissection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10902668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:主动脉夹层修复过程中的远端缝合线可以通过闭合技术或开放技术进行。本研究对两种方法的术后结果进行了回顾性比较。患者和方法:将120例接受A型急性主动脉夹层手术的患者分为两组。A组(n=81)在低温停循环和选择性脑灌注下进行开放式远端吻合。B组(n=39)在轻度低温体外循环下进行远端吻合,主动脉交叉夹紧。主要结果是手术死亡率、神经系统发病率和长期生存率。结果:住院死亡率(开放组17.3%,封闭组12.8%,p=0.053)、永久性神经功能障碍(8.7%,8.3%,p=0.0)和暂时性神经功能障碍的发生率(31.9%,22.2%,p=0.0298)在各组之间没有显著差异。在5年和10年的精算生存率方面没有观察到显著差异(分别为88%对86%和53%对73%,p=0.396)。在倾向评分调整后,未发现远端主动脉修复技术是主要结果的预测因素。结论:开放式修补术可用于大多数(如果不是全部的话)A型急性主动脉夹层的外科修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Open Distal Repair Be Safely Used in All Patients with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection?

Purpose: The distal suture line during aortic dissection repair can be performed by a closed technique or by an open technique. This study presents a retrospective comparison of both methods regarding their postoperative outcomes.

Patients and methods: 120 patients who underwent surgery for acute aortic dissection type A were divided into two groups. In group A (n = 81), open distal anastomosis was performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion. In group B (n = 39), distal anastomosis was performed with the aorta cross-clamped under mildly hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Primary outcomes were operative mortality, neurologic morbidity, and long-term survival.

Results: Hospital mortality (17.3% for the open group vs. 12.8% for the closed group, p = 0.53), permanent neurologic dysfunction (8.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 1.0), and temporary neurologic dysfunction (31.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.298) were not significantly different between groups. No significant difference in actuarial 5- and 10-year survival was observed (88% vs. 86% and 53 vs. 73%, respectively, p = 0.396). After propensity-score adjustment, the technique of distal aortic repair was not found to be a predictor of the primary outcomes.

Conclusion: We conclude that the open repair can be used in most if not all cases of surgical repair of type A acute aortic dissection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信