Xia Ren, Fan Su, Jian Hu, Lei Cao, Yumei Zhou, Yuhan Fu, Grace Tavengana, Mingfei Jiang, Huan Wu, Yufeng Wen
{"title":"颈动脉血流动力学对颈动脉斑块位置的影响：年龄差异。","authors":"Xia Ren, Fan Su, Jian Hu, Lei Cao, Yumei Zhou, Yuhan Fu, Grace Tavengana, Mingfei Jiang, Huan Wu, Yufeng Wen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was aimed to investigate the influence of carotid hemodynamics in common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) on carotid plaque location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4444 participants from Anhui Maanshan People's Hospital were selected from December 2013 to December 2018. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure the location of carotid plaque. Patients were divided into four groups according to plaque location: LEFT, RIGHT, BOTH, and NONE. Multiple logistic regression and smooth curve were applied to determine the relationship of carotid plaque location and hemodynamic indexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the NONE group, the ratio of artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in right internal carotid (RICA S/D) was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.548) after adjustment; artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of left common carotid artery (LCCA S/D) was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.250); resistance index of right internal carotid (RICA RI) was a protective factor for BOTH group (OR=0.097), while LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.201, OR=1.457). Compared with the RIGHT group, artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of right common carotid (RCCA S/D) was the risk factor for the LEFT group (OR=1.463), LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were the risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.706, OR=2.111). After age stratification, resistance index of right common carotid artery (RCCA RI) and resistance index of left internal carotid artery (LICA RI) were protective factors for BOTH group (OR=0.046, OR=0.042) in group younger than 52. RCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.557, OR=1.843). Resistance index of left common carotid artery (LCCA RI) was a protective factor in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.476). In group older than 52, RICA S/D was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.388). LCCA S/D was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.575). LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.348, OR=1.311). RICA S/D and RCCA S/D were protective factors in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.567, OR=0.680).</p>","PeriodicalId":94154,"journal":{"name":"Neuro endocrinology letters","volume":"44 6","pages":"399-409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of carotid hemodynamics on carotid plaque location: Age difference.\",\"authors\":\"Xia Ren, Fan Su, Jian Hu, Lei Cao, Yumei Zhou, Yuhan Fu, Grace Tavengana, Mingfei Jiang, Huan Wu, Yufeng Wen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was aimed to investigate the influence of carotid hemodynamics in common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) on carotid plaque location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4444 participants from Anhui Maanshan People's Hospital were selected from December 2013 to December 2018. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure the location of carotid plaque. Patients were divided into four groups according to plaque location: LEFT, RIGHT, BOTH, and NONE. Multiple logistic regression and smooth curve were applied to determine the relationship of carotid plaque location and hemodynamic indexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the NONE group, the ratio of artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in right internal carotid (RICA S/D) was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.548) after adjustment; artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of left common carotid artery (LCCA S/D) was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.250); resistance index of right internal carotid (RICA RI) was a protective factor for BOTH group (OR=0.097), while LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.201, OR=1.457). Compared with the RIGHT group, artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of right common carotid (RCCA S/D) was the risk factor for the LEFT group (OR=1.463), LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were the risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.706, OR=2.111). After age stratification, resistance index of right common carotid artery (RCCA RI) and resistance index of left internal carotid artery (LICA RI) were protective factors for BOTH group (OR=0.046, OR=0.042) in group younger than 52. RCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.557, OR=1.843). Resistance index of left common carotid artery (LCCA RI) was a protective factor in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.476). In group older than 52, RICA S/D was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.388). LCCA S/D was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.575). LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.348, OR=1.311). RICA S/D and RCCA S/D were protective factors in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.567, OR=0.680).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"399-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro endocrinology letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of carotid hemodynamics on carotid plaque location: Age difference.
Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the influence of carotid hemodynamics in common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) on carotid plaque location.
Methods: A total of 4444 participants from Anhui Maanshan People's Hospital were selected from December 2013 to December 2018. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure the location of carotid plaque. Patients were divided into four groups according to plaque location: LEFT, RIGHT, BOTH, and NONE. Multiple logistic regression and smooth curve were applied to determine the relationship of carotid plaque location and hemodynamic indexes.
Results: Compared with the NONE group, the ratio of artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in right internal carotid (RICA S/D) was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.548) after adjustment; artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of left common carotid artery (LCCA S/D) was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.250); resistance index of right internal carotid (RICA RI) was a protective factor for BOTH group (OR=0.097), while LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.201, OR=1.457). Compared with the RIGHT group, artery systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio of right common carotid (RCCA S/D) was the risk factor for the LEFT group (OR=1.463), LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were the risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.706, OR=2.111). After age stratification, resistance index of right common carotid artery (RCCA RI) and resistance index of left internal carotid artery (LICA RI) were protective factors for BOTH group (OR=0.046, OR=0.042) in group younger than 52. RCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.557, OR=1.843). Resistance index of left common carotid artery (LCCA RI) was a protective factor in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.476). In group older than 52, RICA S/D was a risk factor for LEFT group (OR=1.388). LCCA S/D was a risk factor for RIGHT group (OR=1.575). LCCA S/D and RICA S/D were risk factors for BOTH group (OR=1.348, OR=1.311). RICA S/D and RCCA S/D were protective factors in the LEFT group compared with the RIGHT group (OR=0.567, OR=0.680).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
