非计划返回急诊室的患者的特征,以及促使他们决定返回的因素:解释性顺序混合方法调查的综合结果。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Claire L. Hutchinson , Kate Curtis , Andrea McCloughen
{"title":"非计划返回急诊室的患者的特征,以及促使他们决定返回的因素:解释性顺序混合方法调查的综合结果。","authors":"Claire L. Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Kate Curtis ,&nbsp;Andrea McCloughen","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2023.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To identify common characteristics of patients who return to the ED unplanned and factors that may contribute to their decision to return.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Return visits to the Emergency Department (ED) have been associated with adverse events and deficits in initial care provided. There is increasing evidence to suggest that many return visits may be preventable.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The results of primary quantitative measures (QUAN) followed by qualitative measures (qual) were integrated to build on and explain the quantitative data found in the initial phase of the research.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Integration of results produced three new findings. 1) Most return visits occurred beyond 48 hrs because patients intentionally delayed going back to the ED despite their persisting symptoms; 2) Clinical urgency and deterioration were rarely evident in patients who made return visits in patients and 3) Ineffective communication between the clinician and the patient at discharge may have contributed to patients making the decision to return to the ED.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The decision to return unplanned to the ED is not an immediate response for most patients, and several potentially avoidable factors may influence their decision-making process. Future research should focus on strategies which contribute to the avoidance of unplanned return visits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of patients who return unplanned to the ED, and factors that contribute to their decision to return: Integrated results from an explanatory sequential mixed methods inquiry\",\"authors\":\"Claire L. Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Kate Curtis ,&nbsp;Andrea McCloughen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.auec.2023.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To identify common characteristics of patients who return to the ED unplanned and factors that may contribute to their decision to return.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Return visits to the Emergency Department (ED) have been associated with adverse events and deficits in initial care provided. There is increasing evidence to suggest that many return visits may be preventable.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The results of primary quantitative measures (QUAN) followed by qualitative measures (qual) were integrated to build on and explain the quantitative data found in the initial phase of the research.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Integration of results produced three new findings. 1) Most return visits occurred beyond 48 hrs because patients intentionally delayed going back to the ED despite their persisting symptoms; 2) Clinical urgency and deterioration were rarely evident in patients who made return visits in patients and 3) Ineffective communication between the clinician and the patient at discharge may have contributed to patients making the decision to return to the ED.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The decision to return unplanned to the ED is not an immediate response for most patients, and several potentially avoidable factors may influence their decision-making process. Future research should focus on strategies which contribute to the avoidance of unplanned return visits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000660\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定计划外重返急诊室的患者的常见特征,以及可能导致他们决定重返急诊的因素。背景:急诊科的回访与不良事件和初始护理不足有关。越来越多的证据表明,许多回访可能是可以预防的。方法:综合初级定量测量(QUAN)和定性测量(qual)的结果,以建立和解释研究初始阶段发现的定量数据。结果:综合结果得出三项新发现。1) 大多数回访发生在48小时之后,因为患者尽管症状持续,但故意推迟返回急诊室;2) 临床紧迫性和恶化在患者回访的患者中很少明显,3)临床医生和出院时患者之间的无效沟通可能导致患者决定返回急诊室。结论:对大多数患者来说,计划外返回急诊室的决定不是立即的反应,一些潜在的可避免因素可能会影响他们的决策过程。未来的研究应侧重于有助于避免计划外回访的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of patients who return unplanned to the ED, and factors that contribute to their decision to return: Integrated results from an explanatory sequential mixed methods inquiry

Aim

To identify common characteristics of patients who return to the ED unplanned and factors that may contribute to their decision to return.

Background

Return visits to the Emergency Department (ED) have been associated with adverse events and deficits in initial care provided. There is increasing evidence to suggest that many return visits may be preventable.

Methods

The results of primary quantitative measures (QUAN) followed by qualitative measures (qual) were integrated to build on and explain the quantitative data found in the initial phase of the research.

Results

Integration of results produced three new findings. 1) Most return visits occurred beyond 48 hrs because patients intentionally delayed going back to the ED despite their persisting symptoms; 2) Clinical urgency and deterioration were rarely evident in patients who made return visits in patients and 3) Ineffective communication between the clinician and the patient at discharge may have contributed to patients making the decision to return to the ED.

Conclusion

The decision to return unplanned to the ED is not an immediate response for most patients, and several potentially avoidable factors may influence their decision-making process. Future research should focus on strategies which contribute to the avoidance of unplanned return visits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信