两个世界中最好的:在单一筛查量表中结合DSM-5和ICD-11创伤后应激障碍症状群。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3143
Alina Vasconcelos, Michael Reichenheim, Elizabeth do Nascimento, Eduardo Lima, Christian Kristensen, Mauro Mendlowicz
{"title":"两个世界中最好的:在单一筛查量表中结合DSM-5和ICD-11创伤后应激障碍症状群。","authors":"Alina Vasconcelos, Michael Reichenheim, Elizabeth do Nascimento, Eduardo Lima, Christian Kristensen, Mauro Mendlowicz","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The most recent DSM-5 (2013) and ICD-11 (2018) diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) encompass 20 and six symptoms, respectively, organized in different structures. This study aimed to investigate the dimensions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 5 (PCL-5) according to the DSM-5's broader definition of PTSD and the ICD-11's narrower approach, as well as to explore an alternative restricted model that retains the core symptoms explicitly related to traumatic experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were gathered from Brazilian employees (n=1,101) who had directly experienced traumatic life events or had been exposed to them because of their work activities. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were used to evaluate the configural and metric structures of the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We estimated seven models of the latent structure of PTSD including the four-factor DSM-5 and three-factor ICD-11 PTSD models. Given the lack of evidence of their validity, an alternative 10-symptom model was tested. The final seven-item PTSD model considerably improved estimation of the PTSD construct. This solution showed reliable items with non-redundant content, acceptable fit indices, and satisfactory configural and metric properties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The more parsimonious one-dimensional model comprising the core PTSD symptoms has the potential to improve assessment of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"423-430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The best of two worlds: Combining the DSM-5 and ICD-11 clusters of symptoms for posttraumatic stress disorder in a single screening scale.\",\"authors\":\"Alina Vasconcelos, Michael Reichenheim, Elizabeth do Nascimento, Eduardo Lima, Christian Kristensen, Mauro Mendlowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The most recent DSM-5 (2013) and ICD-11 (2018) diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) encompass 20 and six symptoms, respectively, organized in different structures. This study aimed to investigate the dimensions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 5 (PCL-5) according to the DSM-5's broader definition of PTSD and the ICD-11's narrower approach, as well as to explore an alternative restricted model that retains the core symptoms explicitly related to traumatic experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were gathered from Brazilian employees (n=1,101) who had directly experienced traumatic life events or had been exposed to them because of their work activities. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were used to evaluate the configural and metric structures of the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We estimated seven models of the latent structure of PTSD including the four-factor DSM-5 and three-factor ICD-11 PTSD models. Given the lack of evidence of their validity, an alternative 10-symptom model was tested. The final seven-item PTSD model considerably improved estimation of the PTSD construct. This solution showed reliable items with non-redundant content, acceptable fit indices, and satisfactory configural and metric properties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The more parsimonious one-dimensional model comprising the core PTSD symptoms has the potential to improve assessment of PTSD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"423-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3143\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:DSM-5(2013)和ICD-11(2018)的最新诊断标准列出了创伤后应激障碍,分别包括20种和6种不同结构的症状。该研究旨在根据DSM-5对创伤后应激障碍的更广泛定义和ICD-11的更窄方法,调查创伤后应激功能障碍检查表5的维度,并探索一种保留与创伤经历明确相关的核心症状的替代限制模型。方法:从直接经历过生活创伤事件或因工作活动而接触过这些事件的员工(N=1101)中收集数据。验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)用于评估模型的结构和度量结构。结果:我们估计了PTSD潜在结构的七个模型,包括四因素DSM-5和三因素ICD-11 PTSD模型。鉴于缺乏有效性证据,我们测试了另一种10症状模型。最终的7项PTSD模型显著改进了对PTSD结构的估计。该解决方案显示了具有非冗余内容、可接受的拟合指数以及令人满意的结构和度量特性的可靠项目。结论:包含PTSD核心症状的更简约的一维模型有可能改善PTSD的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The best of two worlds: Combining the DSM-5 and ICD-11 clusters of symptoms for posttraumatic stress disorder in a single screening scale.

Objectives: The most recent DSM-5 (2013) and ICD-11 (2018) diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) encompass 20 and six symptoms, respectively, organized in different structures. This study aimed to investigate the dimensions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 5 (PCL-5) according to the DSM-5's broader definition of PTSD and the ICD-11's narrower approach, as well as to explore an alternative restricted model that retains the core symptoms explicitly related to traumatic experiences.

Methods: Data were gathered from Brazilian employees (n=1,101) who had directly experienced traumatic life events or had been exposed to them because of their work activities. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were used to evaluate the configural and metric structures of the models.

Results: We estimated seven models of the latent structure of PTSD including the four-factor DSM-5 and three-factor ICD-11 PTSD models. Given the lack of evidence of their validity, an alternative 10-symptom model was tested. The final seven-item PTSD model considerably improved estimation of the PTSD construct. This solution showed reliable items with non-redundant content, acceptable fit indices, and satisfactory configural and metric properties.

Conclusion: The more parsimonious one-dimensional model comprising the core PTSD symptoms has the potential to improve assessment of PTSD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry). The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信