外科植入物原位固定稳定滑脱的股骨干骺的时间趋势。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Ethan Chervonski, Taylor Wingo, Carlos Pargas-Colina, Pablo Castañeda
{"title":"外科植入物原位固定稳定滑脱的股骨干骺的时间趋势。","authors":"Ethan Chervonski, Taylor Wingo, Carlos Pargas-Colina, Pablo Castañeda","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a pediatric hip disorder managed with in situ fixation of the proximal femoral epiphysis, otherwise known as 'pinning the hip'. The objective of this study was to characterize how the choice of implant for in situ fixation of stable SCFE has changed over time. A systematic review of publications concerning in situ fixation of stable SCFE from January 1993 to November 2021 was conducted. The change in the type, diameter, and number of implants used in publications over time and the age of their respective patient cohorts was evaluated. A total of 207 articles met inclusion criteria. There was an increase in publications using cannulated screws over time ( P  = 0.0113). As the yearly percentage of publications using threadless non-cannulated implants decreased ( P  = 0.0309), the percentage using cannulated screws increased ( P  = 0.0047). Single-implant fixation also increased ( P  = 0.0409). While there was no difference in the rate of increase of implants < 7 mm or ≥ 7 mm in diameter ( P  = 0.299), patients with larger-diameter implants were, on average, older than patients with smaller-diameter implants ( P  = 0.0462). In general, the age of patients undergoing in situ fixation of stable SCFE has not changed ( P  = 0.595). Irrespective of patient-specific considerations, single cannulated screws have become the implant of choice for in situ fixation of stable SCFE. There has not been a consensus on the optimal implant diameter; instead, patient-specific considerations are of paramount importance in this decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"437-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal trends in surgical implants for in situ fixation of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Chervonski, Taylor Wingo, Carlos Pargas-Colina, Pablo Castañeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a pediatric hip disorder managed with in situ fixation of the proximal femoral epiphysis, otherwise known as 'pinning the hip'. The objective of this study was to characterize how the choice of implant for in situ fixation of stable SCFE has changed over time. A systematic review of publications concerning in situ fixation of stable SCFE from January 1993 to November 2021 was conducted. The change in the type, diameter, and number of implants used in publications over time and the age of their respective patient cohorts was evaluated. A total of 207 articles met inclusion criteria. There was an increase in publications using cannulated screws over time ( P  = 0.0113). As the yearly percentage of publications using threadless non-cannulated implants decreased ( P  = 0.0309), the percentage using cannulated screws increased ( P  = 0.0047). Single-implant fixation also increased ( P  = 0.0409). While there was no difference in the rate of increase of implants < 7 mm or ≥ 7 mm in diameter ( P  = 0.299), patients with larger-diameter implants were, on average, older than patients with smaller-diameter implants ( P  = 0.0462). In general, the age of patients undergoing in situ fixation of stable SCFE has not changed ( P  = 0.595). Irrespective of patient-specific considerations, single cannulated screws have become the implant of choice for in situ fixation of stable SCFE. There has not been a consensus on the optimal implant diameter; instead, patient-specific considerations are of paramount importance in this decision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"437-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001139\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

稳定性股骨干骺滑脱(SCFE)是一种儿童髋关节疾病,通过原位固定股骨近端骺来治疗,也称为“钉扎髋关节”。本研究的目的是描述用于稳定SCFE原位固定的植入物的选择如何随着时间的推移而变化。对1993年1月至2021年11月关于稳定SCFE原位固定的出版物进行了系统综述。评估了出版物中使用的植入物类型、直径和数量随时间的变化及其各自患者队列的年龄。共有207篇文章符合入选标准。随着时间的推移,使用套管螺钉的出版物有所增加(P = 0.0113)。随着使用无螺纹无套管植入物的出版物的年百分比下降(P = 0.0309),使用空心螺钉的百分比增加(P = 0.0047) = 0.0409)。而植入物的增加率没有差异<7 mm或≥7 直径mm(P = 0.299),植入物直径较大的患者平均比植入物直径较小的患者年龄大(P = 0.0462)。总的来说,接受稳定SCFE原位固定的患者的年龄没有变化(P = 0.595)。不管患者的具体考虑因素如何,单空心螺钉已成为稳定SCFE原位固定的首选植入物。对于最佳植入物直径尚未达成共识;相反,在这个决定中,针对患者的考虑是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal trends in surgical implants for in situ fixation of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a pediatric hip disorder managed with in situ fixation of the proximal femoral epiphysis, otherwise known as 'pinning the hip'. The objective of this study was to characterize how the choice of implant for in situ fixation of stable SCFE has changed over time. A systematic review of publications concerning in situ fixation of stable SCFE from January 1993 to November 2021 was conducted. The change in the type, diameter, and number of implants used in publications over time and the age of their respective patient cohorts was evaluated. A total of 207 articles met inclusion criteria. There was an increase in publications using cannulated screws over time ( P  = 0.0113). As the yearly percentage of publications using threadless non-cannulated implants decreased ( P  = 0.0309), the percentage using cannulated screws increased ( P  = 0.0047). Single-implant fixation also increased ( P  = 0.0409). While there was no difference in the rate of increase of implants < 7 mm or ≥ 7 mm in diameter ( P  = 0.299), patients with larger-diameter implants were, on average, older than patients with smaller-diameter implants ( P  = 0.0462). In general, the age of patients undergoing in situ fixation of stable SCFE has not changed ( P  = 0.595). Irrespective of patient-specific considerations, single cannulated screws have become the implant of choice for in situ fixation of stable SCFE. There has not been a consensus on the optimal implant diameter; instead, patient-specific considerations are of paramount importance in this decision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信