营销所谓干细胞治疗和外泌体治疗的美国企业提出的安全性和有效性声明。

IF 2.4 4区医学 Q4 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING

Regenerative medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-05 DOI:10.2217/rme-2023-0118

Leigh Turner, Juan Ramon Martinez, Shemms Najjar, Thevin Rajapaksha Arachchilage, Victoria Sahrai, Jia Chieng Wang

{"title":"营销所谓干细胞治疗和外泌体治疗的美国企业提出的安全性和有效性声明。","authors":"Leigh Turner, Juan Ramon Martinez, Shemms Najjar, Thevin Rajapaksha Arachchilage, Victoria Sahrai, Jia Chieng Wang","doi":"10.2217/rme-2023-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Examining websites of US businesses engaged in direct-to-consumer advertising of putative stem cell treatments and exosome therapies, this study investigated the marketing claims such companies make about the purported safety and efficacy of these products. Methods: Data mining and content analysis of company websites were used to identify and analyze safety and efficacy claims. Results: Of the 978 businesses analyzed, less than half the companies made identifiable claims about the safety and efficacy of their advertised stem cell and exosome products. We also explored how companies framed the stem cell and exosome products they promoted. Representations ranged from assertions that such products are unproven and investigational to claims they constituted cures. Most advertising frames fell between these poles. Conclusion: Some businesses include in their marketing representations claims about the safety and efficacy of advertised products. Businesses that did not make such assertions use other techniques to attract prospective clients.","PeriodicalId":21043,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy claims made by US businesses marketing purported stem cell treatments and exosome therapies.\",\"authors\":\"Leigh Turner, Juan Ramon Martinez, Shemms Najjar, Thevin Rajapaksha Arachchilage, Victoria Sahrai, Jia Chieng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/rme-2023-0118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Examining websites of US businesses engaged in direct-to-consumer advertising of putative stem cell treatments and exosome therapies, this study investigated the marketing claims such companies make about the purported safety and efficacy of these products. Methods: Data mining and content analysis of company websites were used to identify and analyze safety and efficacy claims. Results: Of the 978 businesses analyzed, less than half the companies made identifiable claims about the safety and efficacy of their advertised stem cell and exosome products. We also explored how companies framed the stem cell and exosome products they promoted. Representations ranged from assertions that such products are unproven and investigational to claims they constituted cures. Most advertising frames fell between these poles. Conclusion: Some businesses include in their marketing representations claims about the safety and efficacy of advertised products. Businesses that did not make such assertions use other techniques to attract prospective clients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regenerative medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regenerative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2023-0118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2023-0118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：本研究调查了从事假定干细胞治疗和外泌体治疗的直接面向消费者广告的美国企业的网站，调查了这些公司对这些产品的所谓安全性和有效性的营销声明。方法：采用数据挖掘和内容分析的方法对公司网站的安全性和有效性声明进行识别和分析。结果：在分析的978家企业中，只有不到一半的公司对其广告中的干细胞和外泌体产品的安全性和有效性提出了可识别的声明。我们还探讨了公司如何构建他们推广的干细胞和外泌体产品。陈述的范围从声称这些产品未经证实和研究到声称它们构成了治疗方法。大多数广告架都落在这两根杆子之间。结论：一些企业在其营销陈述中包含了关于广告产品安全性和有效性的声明。没有做出这种断言的企业使用其他技术来吸引潜在客户。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Safety and efficacy claims made by US businesses marketing purported stem cell treatments and exosome therapies.

Aim: Examining websites of US businesses engaged in direct-to-consumer advertising of putative stem cell treatments and exosome therapies, this study investigated the marketing claims such companies make about the purported safety and efficacy of these products. Methods: Data mining and content analysis of company websites were used to identify and analyze safety and efficacy claims. Results: Of the 978 businesses analyzed, less than half the companies made identifiable claims about the safety and efficacy of their advertised stem cell and exosome products. We also explored how companies framed the stem cell and exosome products they promoted. Representations ranged from assertions that such products are unproven and investigational to claims they constituted cures. Most advertising frames fell between these poles. Conclusion: Some businesses include in their marketing representations claims about the safety and efficacy of advertised products. Businesses that did not make such assertions use other techniques to attract prospective clients.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Regenerative medicine 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

3.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Regenerative medicine replaces or regenerates human cells, tissue or organs, to restore or establish normal function*. Since 2006, Regenerative Medicine has been at the forefront of publishing the very best papers and reviews covering the entire regenerative medicine sector. The journal focusses on the entire spectrum of approaches to regenerative medicine, including small molecule drugs, biologics, biomaterials and tissue engineering, and cell and gene therapies – it’s all about regeneration and not a specific platform technology. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of the sector ranging from discovery research, through to clinical development, through to commercialization. Regenerative Medicine uniquely supports this important area of biomedical science and healthcare by providing a peer-reviewed journal totally committed to publishing the very best regenerative medicine research, clinical translation and commercialization. Regenerative Medicine provides a specialist forum to address the important challenges and advances in regenerative medicine, delivering this essential information in concise, clear and attractive article formats – vital to a rapidly growing, multidisciplinary and increasingly time-constrained community. Despite substantial developments in our knowledge and understanding of regeneration, the field is still in its infancy. However, progress is accelerating. The next few decades will see the discovery and development of transformative therapies for patients, and in some cases, even cures. Regenerative Medicine will continue to provide a critical overview of these advances as they progress, undergo clinical trials, and eventually become mainstream medicine.