优化妇女虚拟护理的公平部署:用主要定性数据补充检查患者和提供者观点的定性证据综合方案。

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2023-09-13 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0089
Karen M Goldstein, Dhara B Patel, Katherine A Van Loon, Abigail Shapiro, Sharron Rushton, Allison A Lewinski, Tiera J Lanford, Sarah Cantrell, Leah L Zullig, Sarah M Wilson, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Susan Alton Dailey, Catherine Sims, Cheryl Robinson, Neetu Chawla, Hayden B Bosworth, Alison Hamilton, Jennifer Naylor, Jennifer M Gierisch
{"title":"优化妇女虚拟护理的公平部署:用主要定性数据补充检查患者和提供者观点的定性证据综合方案。","authors":"Karen M Goldstein, Dhara B Patel, Katherine A Van Loon, Abigail Shapiro, Sharron Rushton, Allison A Lewinski, Tiera J Lanford, Sarah Cantrell, Leah L Zullig, Sarah M Wilson, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Susan Alton Dailey, Catherine Sims, Cheryl Robinson, Neetu Chawla, Hayden B Bosworth, Alison Hamilton, Jennifer Naylor, Jennifer M Gierisch","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Women experience numerous barriers to patient-centered health care (e.g., lack of continuity). Such barriers are amplified for women from marginalized communities. Virtual care may improve equitable access. We are conducting a partner-engaged, qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) of patients' and providers' experiences with virtual health care delivery for women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a best-fit framework approach informed by the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework and Public Health Critical Race Praxis. We will supplement published literature with qualitative interviews with women from underrepresented communities and their health care providers. We will engage patients and other contributors through multiple participatory methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 5525 articles published from 2010 to 2022. Sixty were eligible, of which 42 focused on women and 24 on provider experiences. Data abstraction and analysis are ongoing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This work offers four key innovations to advance health equity: (1) conceptual foundation rooted in an antiracist action-oriented praxis; (2) worked example of centering QES on marginalized communities; (3) supplementing QES with primary qualitative information with populations historically marginalized in the health care system; and (4) participatory approaches that foster longitudinal partnered engagement.</p><p><strong>Health equity implications: </strong>Our approach to exploring virtual health care for women demonstrates an antiracist praxis to inform knowledge generation. In doing so, we aim to generate findings that can guide health care systems in the equitable deployment of comprehensive virtual care for women.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"570-580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing the Equitable Deployment of Virtual Care for Women: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Examining Patient and Provider Perspectives Supplemented with Primary Qualitative Data.\",\"authors\":\"Karen M Goldstein, Dhara B Patel, Katherine A Van Loon, Abigail Shapiro, Sharron Rushton, Allison A Lewinski, Tiera J Lanford, Sarah Cantrell, Leah L Zullig, Sarah M Wilson, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Susan Alton Dailey, Catherine Sims, Cheryl Robinson, Neetu Chawla, Hayden B Bosworth, Alison Hamilton, Jennifer Naylor, Jennifer M Gierisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/heq.2023.0089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Women experience numerous barriers to patient-centered health care (e.g., lack of continuity). Such barriers are amplified for women from marginalized communities. Virtual care may improve equitable access. We are conducting a partner-engaged, qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) of patients' and providers' experiences with virtual health care delivery for women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a best-fit framework approach informed by the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework and Public Health Critical Race Praxis. We will supplement published literature with qualitative interviews with women from underrepresented communities and their health care providers. We will engage patients and other contributors through multiple participatory methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 5525 articles published from 2010 to 2022. Sixty were eligible, of which 42 focused on women and 24 on provider experiences. Data abstraction and analysis are ongoing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This work offers four key innovations to advance health equity: (1) conceptual foundation rooted in an antiracist action-oriented praxis; (2) worked example of centering QES on marginalized communities; (3) supplementing QES with primary qualitative information with populations historically marginalized in the health care system; and (4) participatory approaches that foster longitudinal partnered engagement.</p><p><strong>Health equity implications: </strong>Our approach to exploring virtual health care for women demonstrates an antiracist praxis to inform knowledge generation. In doing so, we aim to generate findings that can guide health care systems in the equitable deployment of comprehensive virtual care for women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Equity\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"570-580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Equity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:女性在以患者为中心的医疗保健方面遇到了许多障碍(例如缺乏连续性)。对于来自边缘化社区的妇女来说,这种障碍更加严重。虚拟护理可以改善公平获取。我们正在对患者和提供者在为女性提供虚拟医疗服务方面的经验进行合作伙伴参与的定性证据综合(QES)。方法:我们使用最适合的框架方法,根据不采用、放弃、扩大、传播和可持续性框架以及公共卫生关键种族实践。我们将对来自代表性不足社区的妇女及其医疗保健提供者进行定性采访,以补充已发表的文献。我们将通过多种参与方式让患者和其他贡献者参与进来。结果:我们的搜索发现了从2010年到2022年发表的5525篇文章。60人符合资格,其中42人关注女性,24人关注提供者体验。数据提取和分析正在进行中。讨论:这项工作为促进健康公平提供了四个关键创新:(1)植根于反种族主义行动导向实践的概念基础;(2) 以边缘化社区为中心的QES工作实例;(3) 用卫生保健系统中历史上被边缘化的人群的主要定性信息补充QES;以及(4)促进纵向伙伴参与的参与性方法。健康公平影响:我们探索女性虚拟医疗保健的方法表明了一种反种族主义的实践,为知识生成提供信息。在这样做的过程中,我们的目标是产生能够指导医疗保健系统公平部署妇女全面虚拟护理的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimizing the Equitable Deployment of Virtual Care for Women: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Examining Patient and Provider Perspectives Supplemented with Primary Qualitative Data.

Optimizing the Equitable Deployment of Virtual Care for Women: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Examining Patient and Provider Perspectives Supplemented with Primary Qualitative Data.

Optimizing the Equitable Deployment of Virtual Care for Women: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Examining Patient and Provider Perspectives Supplemented with Primary Qualitative Data.

Optimizing the Equitable Deployment of Virtual Care for Women: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Examining Patient and Provider Perspectives Supplemented with Primary Qualitative Data.

Introduction: Women experience numerous barriers to patient-centered health care (e.g., lack of continuity). Such barriers are amplified for women from marginalized communities. Virtual care may improve equitable access. We are conducting a partner-engaged, qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) of patients' and providers' experiences with virtual health care delivery for women.

Methods: We use a best-fit framework approach informed by the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework and Public Health Critical Race Praxis. We will supplement published literature with qualitative interviews with women from underrepresented communities and their health care providers. We will engage patients and other contributors through multiple participatory methods.

Results: Our search identified 5525 articles published from 2010 to 2022. Sixty were eligible, of which 42 focused on women and 24 on provider experiences. Data abstraction and analysis are ongoing.

Discussion: This work offers four key innovations to advance health equity: (1) conceptual foundation rooted in an antiracist action-oriented praxis; (2) worked example of centering QES on marginalized communities; (3) supplementing QES with primary qualitative information with populations historically marginalized in the health care system; and (4) participatory approaches that foster longitudinal partnered engagement.

Health equity implications: Our approach to exploring virtual health care for women demonstrates an antiracist praxis to inform knowledge generation. In doing so, we aim to generate findings that can guide health care systems in the equitable deployment of comprehensive virtual care for women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信