双入路手术治疗被忽视的肘关节脱位的功能结果。

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2023-09-21 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S419508
Tito Sumarwoto, Seti Aji Hadinoto, Dina Aprilya, Sigit Bayudono, Totok Siswanto
{"title":"双入路手术治疗被忽视的肘关节脱位的功能结果。","authors":"Tito Sumarwoto,&nbsp;Seti Aji Hadinoto,&nbsp;Dina Aprilya,&nbsp;Sigit Bayudono,&nbsp;Totok Siswanto","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S419508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neglected elbow dislocation is common in developing countries. The chronic nature of the disease results in a level of complexity that makes treatments and outcomes contradictory. Several treatment methods have been described for neglected elbow dislocations. The goal of this study was to evaluate the results of neglected elbow dislocations treated using the double approach of reduction and K-wire fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This series included patients with neglected elbow dislocations who were treated with open reduction using double approaches (medial and lateral incisions) between November 2020 and March 2021. Patients were evaluated for a minimum of 6 months to ascertain functional recovery in accordance with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients with neglected elbow dislocations were included in the study, with an average delay of 3.44 months. Four patients had an excellent MEPI and five had a good score at the final follow-up, with a mean MEPI score of 86.67. The average DASH score was 36 (31-59). Five patients (55.56%) experienced no pain, but four patients (44.44%) had mild pain, with a range of pain points of 30-45. The motion arc improvement was 60°-100°, with a mean of 74.44°. Almost all of the patients (eight patients, 88.89%) had elbow stability, but one patient had ulnar nerve paresthesia postoperatively. Heterotopic ossificans was associated in 1 patient, and triceps lengthening was needed in 1 patient; both came 5 months later.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open reduction surgery with a double approach offers a good chance of a good result with few side effects and should be considered for all patients who have this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"15 ","pages":"175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/8e/orr-15-175.PMC10519220.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Outcomes of Neglected Elbow Dislocation Treated with Double Approach Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Tito Sumarwoto,&nbsp;Seti Aji Hadinoto,&nbsp;Dina Aprilya,&nbsp;Sigit Bayudono,&nbsp;Totok Siswanto\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ORR.S419508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neglected elbow dislocation is common in developing countries. The chronic nature of the disease results in a level of complexity that makes treatments and outcomes contradictory. Several treatment methods have been described for neglected elbow dislocations. The goal of this study was to evaluate the results of neglected elbow dislocations treated using the double approach of reduction and K-wire fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This series included patients with neglected elbow dislocations who were treated with open reduction using double approaches (medial and lateral incisions) between November 2020 and March 2021. Patients were evaluated for a minimum of 6 months to ascertain functional recovery in accordance with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients with neglected elbow dislocations were included in the study, with an average delay of 3.44 months. Four patients had an excellent MEPI and five had a good score at the final follow-up, with a mean MEPI score of 86.67. The average DASH score was 36 (31-59). Five patients (55.56%) experienced no pain, but four patients (44.44%) had mild pain, with a range of pain points of 30-45. The motion arc improvement was 60°-100°, with a mean of 74.44°. Almost all of the patients (eight patients, 88.89%) had elbow stability, but one patient had ulnar nerve paresthesia postoperatively. Heterotopic ossificans was associated in 1 patient, and triceps lengthening was needed in 1 patient; both came 5 months later.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open reduction surgery with a double approach offers a good chance of a good result with few side effects and should be considered for all patients who have this condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"175-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/8e/orr-15-175.PMC10519220.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S419508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S419508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:被忽视的肘关节脱位在发展中国家很常见。这种疾病的慢性性质导致了一定程度的复杂性,使治疗和结果相互矛盾。已经描述了几种被忽视的肘关节脱位的治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估使用复位和K线固定双重方法治疗被忽视的肘关节脱位的结果。方法:该系列包括2020年11月至2021年3月期间接受双入路(内侧和外侧切口)切开复位治疗的被忽视的肘关节脱位患者。根据Mayo肘关节功能指数(MEPI)和手臂、肩膀和手部残疾(DASH)评分,对患者进行至少6个月的评估,以确定功能恢复情况。结果:9例被忽视的肘关节脱位患者被纳入研究,平均延迟3.44个月。四名患者的MEPI表现出色,五名患者在最后的随访中得分良好,平均MEPI得分为86.67。DASH的平均得分为36(31-59)。5名患者(55.56%)没有疼痛,但4名患者(44.44%)有轻微疼痛,疼痛点范围为30-45。运动弧改善60°-100°,平均74.44°。几乎所有患者(8例,88.89%)肘部稳定,但有1例患者术后尺神经感觉异常。1例患者合并异位骨化,1例患者需要延长三头肌;两人都在5个月后出生。结论:双入路开放复位手术有很好的机会取得良好的效果,副作用很少,所有有这种情况的患者都应该考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Functional Outcomes of Neglected Elbow Dislocation Treated with Double Approach Surgery.

Functional Outcomes of Neglected Elbow Dislocation Treated with Double Approach Surgery.

Functional Outcomes of Neglected Elbow Dislocation Treated with Double Approach Surgery.

Background: Neglected elbow dislocation is common in developing countries. The chronic nature of the disease results in a level of complexity that makes treatments and outcomes contradictory. Several treatment methods have been described for neglected elbow dislocations. The goal of this study was to evaluate the results of neglected elbow dislocations treated using the double approach of reduction and K-wire fixation.

Methods: This series included patients with neglected elbow dislocations who were treated with open reduction using double approaches (medial and lateral incisions) between November 2020 and March 2021. Patients were evaluated for a minimum of 6 months to ascertain functional recovery in accordance with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

Results: Nine patients with neglected elbow dislocations were included in the study, with an average delay of 3.44 months. Four patients had an excellent MEPI and five had a good score at the final follow-up, with a mean MEPI score of 86.67. The average DASH score was 36 (31-59). Five patients (55.56%) experienced no pain, but four patients (44.44%) had mild pain, with a range of pain points of 30-45. The motion arc improvement was 60°-100°, with a mean of 74.44°. Almost all of the patients (eight patients, 88.89%) had elbow stability, but one patient had ulnar nerve paresthesia postoperatively. Heterotopic ossificans was associated in 1 patient, and triceps lengthening was needed in 1 patient; both came 5 months later.

Conclusion: Open reduction surgery with a double approach offers a good chance of a good result with few side effects and should be considered for all patients who have this condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信