用于成瘾治疗的迷幻药的知识产权:通过保护公共领域实现获取和保护创新机会。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-03 DOI:10.15288/jsad.22-00425
Sisi Li, Taylor Kurtzweil, Shahin Shams, Amanda Pratt, Sean Rudi
{"title":"用于成瘾治疗的迷幻药的知识产权:通过保护公共领域实现获取和保护创新机会。","authors":"Sisi Li, Taylor Kurtzweil, Shahin Shams, Amanda Pratt, Sean Rudi","doi":"10.15288/jsad.22-00425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent research has shown potential for psychedelic therapeutics as addiction treatments; however, some academic institutions, commercial entities, and individuals are attempting to monopolize psychedelic compounds through exploiting the patent process.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This Perspective article describes efforts that have been devised to mitigate exclusionary patent practices pertinent to psychedelic therapeutics for addiction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nonprofit Porta Sophia has identified 170 patent documents focused on treating addiction through psychedelics, and many of these patents could threaten to privatize public domain knowledge and severely limit or increase the cost of research if granted. Patent examiners who determine if a patent application should be granted must negate false claims to innovation. Yet, given the unique history of psychedelics, prior knowledge can be difficult to find. As a result, overreaching patents may be granted, causing dramatic shifts in access to addiction-focused psychedelic research, treatments, and funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the field of psychedelics approaches this crucial inflection point of U.S. Food and Drug Administration decisions, it is imperative for all stakeholders--including university investigators, academic and commercial patent seekers, and policymakers--to use available tools for determining prior knowledge. Maintaining an informed awareness of legal patent eligibility and limitations is crucial for establishing an ethical patent landscape and ensuring subsequent access to these potential life-altering psychedelic therapeutics for addiction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":"589-594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual Property of Psychedelics for Addiction Treatment: Enabling Access and Protecting Innovation Opportunities Through Preserving the Public Domain.\",\"authors\":\"Sisi Li, Taylor Kurtzweil, Shahin Shams, Amanda Pratt, Sean Rudi\",\"doi\":\"10.15288/jsad.22-00425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent research has shown potential for psychedelic therapeutics as addiction treatments; however, some academic institutions, commercial entities, and individuals are attempting to monopolize psychedelic compounds through exploiting the patent process.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This Perspective article describes efforts that have been devised to mitigate exclusionary patent practices pertinent to psychedelic therapeutics for addiction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nonprofit Porta Sophia has identified 170 patent documents focused on treating addiction through psychedelics, and many of these patents could threaten to privatize public domain knowledge and severely limit or increase the cost of research if granted. Patent examiners who determine if a patent application should be granted must negate false claims to innovation. Yet, given the unique history of psychedelics, prior knowledge can be difficult to find. As a result, overreaching patents may be granted, causing dramatic shifts in access to addiction-focused psychedelic research, treatments, and funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the field of psychedelics approaches this crucial inflection point of U.S. Food and Drug Administration decisions, it is imperative for all stakeholders--including university investigators, academic and commercial patent seekers, and policymakers--to use available tools for determining prior knowledge. Maintaining an informed awareness of legal patent eligibility and limitations is crucial for establishing an ethical patent landscape and ensuring subsequent access to these potential life-altering psychedelic therapeutics for addiction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"589-594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.22-00425\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.22-00425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近的研究显示了迷幻疗法作为成瘾治疗的潜力;然而,一些学术机构、商业实体和个人正试图通过专利程序垄断迷幻化合物。方法:这篇透视文章描述了为减少与成瘾的迷幻疗法相关的排他性专利实践所做的努力。结果:非营利组织Porta Sophia已经确定了170份专注于通过迷幻药治疗成瘾的专利文件,其中许多专利可能会威胁到公共领域知识的私有化,如果获得批准,将严重限制或增加研究成本。决定专利申请是否应该被批准的专利审查员必须否定虚假的创新主张。然而,鉴于迷幻药的独特历史,很难找到先前的知识。因此,过度的专利可能会被授予,导致人们在获得以成瘾为重点的迷幻研究、治疗和资金方面发生巨大变化。结论:随着迷幻药领域接近美国食品药品监督管理局决定的这一关键转折点,所有利益相关者——包括大学研究人员、学术和商业专利寻求者以及政策制定者——都必须利用现有工具来确定先验知识。保持对合法专利资格和限制的知情意识对于建立道德专利格局和确保随后获得这些潜在的改变生活的成瘾迷幻疗法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intellectual Property of Psychedelics for Addiction Treatment: Enabling Access and Protecting Innovation Opportunities Through Preserving the Public Domain.

Objective: Recent research has shown potential for psychedelic therapeutics as addiction treatments; however, some academic institutions, commercial entities, and individuals are attempting to monopolize psychedelic compounds through exploiting the patent process.

Method: This Perspective article describes efforts that have been devised to mitigate exclusionary patent practices pertinent to psychedelic therapeutics for addiction.

Results: The nonprofit Porta Sophia has identified 170 patent documents focused on treating addiction through psychedelics, and many of these patents could threaten to privatize public domain knowledge and severely limit or increase the cost of research if granted. Patent examiners who determine if a patent application should be granted must negate false claims to innovation. Yet, given the unique history of psychedelics, prior knowledge can be difficult to find. As a result, overreaching patents may be granted, causing dramatic shifts in access to addiction-focused psychedelic research, treatments, and funding.

Conclusions: As the field of psychedelics approaches this crucial inflection point of U.S. Food and Drug Administration decisions, it is imperative for all stakeholders--including university investigators, academic and commercial patent seekers, and policymakers--to use available tools for determining prior knowledge. Maintaining an informed awareness of legal patent eligibility and limitations is crucial for establishing an ethical patent landscape and ensuring subsequent access to these potential life-altering psychedelic therapeutics for addiction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信