老年人股骨颈骨折的治疗:韩国髋关节学会外科医生的调查。

Hip & pelvis Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-06 DOI:10.5371/hp.2023.35.3.157
Hong Seok Kim, Je-Hyun Yoo, Young-Kyun Lee, Jong-Seok Park, Ye-Yeon Won
{"title":"老年人股骨颈骨折的治疗:韩国髋关节学会外科医生的调查。","authors":"Hong Seok Kim,&nbsp;Je-Hyun Yoo,&nbsp;Young-Kyun Lee,&nbsp;Jong-Seok Park,&nbsp;Ye-Yeon Won","doi":"10.5371/hp.2023.35.3.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the methods for treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF) preferred by members of the Korean Hip Society (KHS) and identified factors that influence decisions regarding the surgical intervention of choice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 97 members of the KHS responded to the 16-question survey which included questions about the mean number of surgeries performed each month for treatment of femoral neck fractures, the cut-off age for deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty, the implant used most often, usage of cement, and factors influencing each decision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean cut-off age used when deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty was 64 years old. Hemiarthroplasty (HA) (70%) was the most preferred option for treatment of displaced FNFs in cases where arthroplasty was indicated (total hip arthroplasty [THA] 19% and dual mobility THA 11%). The main reasons for selection of arthroplasty over reduction with internal fixation were age and pre-fracture ambulatory status. Pre-trauma ambulatory status and/or sports activity were the main factors in selection of HA over THA. Cement was used by 33% of responders. Poor bone quality and a broad femoral canal were factors that influenced the usage of cement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Management of FNFs in the elderly is a major health problem worldwide; thus, remaining alert to current trends in treatment is essential for surgeons. The mean cut-off age used in deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty was 64 years old. HA is the preferred method for treatment of displaced FNFs for members of the KHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"35 3","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/35/hp-35-157.PMC10505840.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Survey of the Korean Hip Society Surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Hong Seok Kim,&nbsp;Je-Hyun Yoo,&nbsp;Young-Kyun Lee,&nbsp;Jong-Seok Park,&nbsp;Ye-Yeon Won\",\"doi\":\"10.5371/hp.2023.35.3.157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the methods for treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF) preferred by members of the Korean Hip Society (KHS) and identified factors that influence decisions regarding the surgical intervention of choice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 97 members of the KHS responded to the 16-question survey which included questions about the mean number of surgeries performed each month for treatment of femoral neck fractures, the cut-off age for deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty, the implant used most often, usage of cement, and factors influencing each decision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean cut-off age used when deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty was 64 years old. Hemiarthroplasty (HA) (70%) was the most preferred option for treatment of displaced FNFs in cases where arthroplasty was indicated (total hip arthroplasty [THA] 19% and dual mobility THA 11%). The main reasons for selection of arthroplasty over reduction with internal fixation were age and pre-fracture ambulatory status. Pre-trauma ambulatory status and/or sports activity were the main factors in selection of HA over THA. Cement was used by 33% of responders. Poor bone quality and a broad femoral canal were factors that influenced the usage of cement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Management of FNFs in the elderly is a major health problem worldwide; thus, remaining alert to current trends in treatment is essential for surgeons. The mean cut-off age used in deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty was 64 years old. HA is the preferred method for treatment of displaced FNFs for members of the KHS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hip & pelvis\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"157-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/35/hp-35-157.PMC10505840.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hip & pelvis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2023.35.3.157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2023.35.3.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了韩国髋关节学会(KHS)成员首选的股骨颈骨折(FNF)的治疗方法,并确定了影响手术干预决策的因素。材料和方法:共有97名KHS成员对这项16个问题的调查做出了回应,其中包括关于每月治疗股骨颈骨折的平均手术次数、决定内固定和关节成形术的截止年龄、最常用的植入物、水泥的使用以及影响每项决定的因素的问题。结果:在决定内固定和关节成形术时使用的平均截止年龄为64岁。在需要关节成形术的情况下,半关节置换术(HA)(70%)是治疗移位的FNF的最优选选择(全髋关节置换术[THA]19%,双活动度THA11%)。选择关节成形术而不是内固定复位的主要原因是年龄和骨折前的活动状态。创伤前的活动状态和/或体育活动是选择HA而非THA的主要因素。33%的应答者使用水泥。骨质量差和股骨粗管是影响水泥使用的因素。结论:老年人FNF的管理是世界范围内的一个主要健康问题;因此,对外科医生来说,保持对当前治疗趋势的警惕是至关重要的。决定内固定和关节成形术的平均截止年龄为64岁。HA是KHS成员治疗移位FNF的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Survey of the Korean Hip Society Surgeons.

Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Survey of the Korean Hip Society Surgeons.

Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Survey of the Korean Hip Society Surgeons.

Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Survey of the Korean Hip Society Surgeons.

Purpose: This study examined the methods for treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF) preferred by members of the Korean Hip Society (KHS) and identified factors that influence decisions regarding the surgical intervention of choice.

Materials and methods: A total of 97 members of the KHS responded to the 16-question survey which included questions about the mean number of surgeries performed each month for treatment of femoral neck fractures, the cut-off age for deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty, the implant used most often, usage of cement, and factors influencing each decision.

Results: The mean cut-off age used when deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty was 64 years old. Hemiarthroplasty (HA) (70%) was the most preferred option for treatment of displaced FNFs in cases where arthroplasty was indicated (total hip arthroplasty [THA] 19% and dual mobility THA 11%). The main reasons for selection of arthroplasty over reduction with internal fixation were age and pre-fracture ambulatory status. Pre-trauma ambulatory status and/or sports activity were the main factors in selection of HA over THA. Cement was used by 33% of responders. Poor bone quality and a broad femoral canal were factors that influenced the usage of cement.

Conclusion: Management of FNFs in the elderly is a major health problem worldwide; thus, remaining alert to current trends in treatment is essential for surgeons. The mean cut-off age used in deciding between internal fixation and arthroplasty was 64 years old. HA is the preferred method for treatment of displaced FNFs for members of the KHS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信