乙状结肠间隔受试者的最佳左心室直径测量:与三维左心室容积的比较。

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Echocardiography Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s12574-023-00626-8
Kazunori Okada, Masahiro Nakabachi, Yasuhiro Hayashi, Masaaki Shinagawa, Ayaka Yoshikawa, Kosuke Tsujita, Yoichi Sakamoto
{"title":"乙状结肠间隔受试者的最佳左心室直径测量:与三维左心室容积的比较。","authors":"Kazunori Okada, Masahiro Nakabachi, Yasuhiro Hayashi, Masaaki Shinagawa, Ayaka Yoshikawa, Kosuke Tsujita, Yoichi Sakamoto","doi":"10.1007/s12574-023-00626-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate measurement of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter for subjects with the sigmoid septum (SS) by measuring the LV end-diastolic diameter at the base and mid-ventricle and by examining the relationship between these measurements and the three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic LV end-diastolic volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 91 patients who underwent echocardiography for screening cardiovascular abnormalities, the aorto-septal angle (ASA) was measured as an index of the sigmoid septum. LV end-diastolic diameter was measured at the base and mid-ventricular level (DD<sub>base</sub> and DD<sub>mid</sub>, respectively), and their average value was calculated (DD<sub>avg</sub>). By using 3D echocardiography, LV end-diastolic volume (EDV<sub>3D</sub>) was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 91 patients, 48 patients had narrow ASA (< 120 degrees) and were divided into the sigmoid septum (SS) group, and the remaining 43 patients were divided into the non-SS group. In the SS group, all DD<sub>base</sub>, DD<sub>mid</sub>, and DD<sub>avg</sub> were significantly correlated with EDV<sub>3D</sub> (r = 0.59, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively), and the correlation coefficient between DD<sub>base</sub> and EDV<sub>3D</sub> was significantly lower than that between DD<sub>mid</sub> and EDV<sub>3D</sub> (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in the non-SS group, all DD<sub>base</sub>, DD<sub>mid</sub>, and DD<sub>avg</sub> were significantly correlated with EDV<sub>3D</sub> (r = 0.77, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively), and the correlation coefficient between DD<sub>base</sub> and EDV<sub>3D</sub> was statistically comparable to that between DD<sub>mid</sub> and EDV<sub>3D</sub> (p = 0.12). ASA was significantly correlated with the difference of DD<sub>mid</sub> minus DD<sub>base</sub> (r =  - 0.71, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with SS, DD<sub>mid</sub> and DD<sub>avg</sub> were well reflected the 3D echocardiographic LV end-diastolic volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal left ventricular diameter measurement in subjects with sigmoid septum: comparison with three-dimensional left ventricular volume.\",\"authors\":\"Kazunori Okada, Masahiro Nakabachi, Yasuhiro Hayashi, Masaaki Shinagawa, Ayaka Yoshikawa, Kosuke Tsujita, Yoichi Sakamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12574-023-00626-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate measurement of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter for subjects with the sigmoid septum (SS) by measuring the LV end-diastolic diameter at the base and mid-ventricle and by examining the relationship between these measurements and the three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic LV end-diastolic volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 91 patients who underwent echocardiography for screening cardiovascular abnormalities, the aorto-septal angle (ASA) was measured as an index of the sigmoid septum. LV end-diastolic diameter was measured at the base and mid-ventricular level (DD<sub>base</sub> and DD<sub>mid</sub>, respectively), and their average value was calculated (DD<sub>avg</sub>). By using 3D echocardiography, LV end-diastolic volume (EDV<sub>3D</sub>) was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 91 patients, 48 patients had narrow ASA (< 120 degrees) and were divided into the sigmoid septum (SS) group, and the remaining 43 patients were divided into the non-SS group. In the SS group, all DD<sub>base</sub>, DD<sub>mid</sub>, and DD<sub>avg</sub> were significantly correlated with EDV<sub>3D</sub> (r = 0.59, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively), and the correlation coefficient between DD<sub>base</sub> and EDV<sub>3D</sub> was significantly lower than that between DD<sub>mid</sub> and EDV<sub>3D</sub> (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in the non-SS group, all DD<sub>base</sub>, DD<sub>mid</sub>, and DD<sub>avg</sub> were significantly correlated with EDV<sub>3D</sub> (r = 0.77, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively), and the correlation coefficient between DD<sub>base</sub> and EDV<sub>3D</sub> was statistically comparable to that between DD<sub>mid</sub> and EDV<sub>3D</sub> (p = 0.12). ASA was significantly correlated with the difference of DD<sub>mid</sub> minus DD<sub>base</sub> (r =  - 0.71, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with SS, DD<sub>mid</sub> and DD<sub>avg</sub> were well reflected the 3D echocardiographic LV end-diastolic volume.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Echocardiography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"41-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Echocardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00626-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00626-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是通过测量左心室底部和中部的舒张末期直径,并通过检查这些测量值与三维(3D)超声心动图左心室舒张末期容积之间的关系,来确定乙状结肠间隔(SS)受试者左心室(LV)舒张末期直径的最合适测量值。方法:在91例接受超声心动图筛查心血管异常的患者中,测量主动脉间隔角(ASA)作为乙状结肠间隔的指标。在心室底部和中部水平(分别为DDbase和DDmid)测量左心室舒张末期直径,并计算其平均值(DDavg)。采用三维超声心动图测量左心室舒张末期容积(EDV3D)。结果:91例患者中,有48例ASA狭窄(基础、DDmid和DDavg与EDV3D显著相关(r = 分别为0.59、0.80和0.76),并且DDbase与EDV3D的相关系数显著低于DDmid与EDV3D的相关系数(p 基线、DDmid和DDavg与EDV3D显著相关(r = 分别为0.77、0.85和0.84),并且DDbase和EDV3D之间的相关系数在统计学上与DDmid和EDV3D之间具有可比性(p = ASA与DDmid减去DDbase的差异显著相关(r =  - 0.71,p 结论:在SS患者中,DDmid和DDavg能很好地反映三维超声心动图左心室舒张末期容积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal left ventricular diameter measurement in subjects with sigmoid septum: comparison with three-dimensional left ventricular volume.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate measurement of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter for subjects with the sigmoid septum (SS) by measuring the LV end-diastolic diameter at the base and mid-ventricle and by examining the relationship between these measurements and the three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic LV end-diastolic volume.

Methods: In 91 patients who underwent echocardiography for screening cardiovascular abnormalities, the aorto-septal angle (ASA) was measured as an index of the sigmoid septum. LV end-diastolic diameter was measured at the base and mid-ventricular level (DDbase and DDmid, respectively), and their average value was calculated (DDavg). By using 3D echocardiography, LV end-diastolic volume (EDV3D) was measured.

Results: Among 91 patients, 48 patients had narrow ASA (< 120 degrees) and were divided into the sigmoid septum (SS) group, and the remaining 43 patients were divided into the non-SS group. In the SS group, all DDbase, DDmid, and DDavg were significantly correlated with EDV3D (r = 0.59, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively), and the correlation coefficient between DDbase and EDV3D was significantly lower than that between DDmid and EDV3D (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in the non-SS group, all DDbase, DDmid, and DDavg were significantly correlated with EDV3D (r = 0.77, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively), and the correlation coefficient between DDbase and EDV3D was statistically comparable to that between DDmid and EDV3D (p = 0.12). ASA was significantly correlated with the difference of DDmid minus DDbase (r =  - 0.71, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In patients with SS, DDmid and DDavg were well reflected the 3D echocardiographic LV end-diastolic volume.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Echocardiography
Journal of Echocardiography CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Echocardiography, the official journal of the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, publishes work that contributes to progress in the field and articles in clinical research as well, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with this discipline. The journal welcomes original investigations, review articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and case image in cardiovascular ultrasound, which will be reviewed by the editorial board. The Journal of Echocardiography provides the best of up-to-date information from around the world, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信