[对中性或阴性结果的心血管试验的批评性解读]。

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alberto Aimo, Vincenzo Castiglione, Iacopo Fabiani, Paolo Morfino, Michele Emdin, Roberto Ferrari, Luigi Tavazzi, Aldo Pietro Maggioni, Claudio Rapezzi
{"title":"[对中性或阴性结果的心血管试验的批评性解读]。","authors":"Alberto Aimo,&nbsp;Vincenzo Castiglione,&nbsp;Iacopo Fabiani,&nbsp;Paolo Morfino,&nbsp;Michele Emdin,&nbsp;Roberto Ferrari,&nbsp;Luigi Tavazzi,&nbsp;Aldo Pietro Maggioni,&nbsp;Claudio Rapezzi","doi":"10.1714/4100.40982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Randomized controlled trials showing a significant benefit are met with enthusiasm because they may change the standard of care for patients who share the clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics of trial participants. Nonetheless, a well-designed and fully executed trial with neutral or negative findings also represents a critically important investigation deserving careful scientific scrutiny. In this paper we propose a 10-step approach to the interpretation of neutral or negative trials to exclude important methodological issues before concluding that the treatment really does not work. We will discuss this approach using the most classic trials of the past and some notable examples among superiority trials (mostly phase 3 trials) published over the last years.</p>","PeriodicalId":12510,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di cardiologia","volume":"24 10","pages":"818-826"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Critical reading of cardiovascular trials with neutral or negative findings].\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Aimo,&nbsp;Vincenzo Castiglione,&nbsp;Iacopo Fabiani,&nbsp;Paolo Morfino,&nbsp;Michele Emdin,&nbsp;Roberto Ferrari,&nbsp;Luigi Tavazzi,&nbsp;Aldo Pietro Maggioni,&nbsp;Claudio Rapezzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1714/4100.40982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Randomized controlled trials showing a significant benefit are met with enthusiasm because they may change the standard of care for patients who share the clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics of trial participants. Nonetheless, a well-designed and fully executed trial with neutral or negative findings also represents a critically important investigation deserving careful scientific scrutiny. In this paper we propose a 10-step approach to the interpretation of neutral or negative trials to exclude important methodological issues before concluding that the treatment really does not work. We will discuss this approach using the most classic trials of the past and some notable examples among superiority trials (mostly phase 3 trials) published over the last years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale italiano di cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"24 10\",\"pages\":\"818-826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale italiano di cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1714/4100.40982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1714/4100.40982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

显示出显著益处的随机对照试验受到了热烈欢迎,因为它们可能会改变具有试验参与者临床和病理生理特征的患者的护理标准。尽管如此,一项设计良好、执行充分、结果中立或消极的试验也代表着一项至关重要的调查,值得仔细的科学审查。在本文中,我们提出了一种10步方法来解释中性或阴性试验,以排除重要的方法学问题,然后得出治疗确实不起作用的结论。我们将使用过去最经典的试验和过去几年发表的优势试验(主要是第三阶段试验)中的一些显著例子来讨论这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Critical reading of cardiovascular trials with neutral or negative findings].

Randomized controlled trials showing a significant benefit are met with enthusiasm because they may change the standard of care for patients who share the clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics of trial participants. Nonetheless, a well-designed and fully executed trial with neutral or negative findings also represents a critically important investigation deserving careful scientific scrutiny. In this paper we propose a 10-step approach to the interpretation of neutral or negative trials to exclude important methodological issues before concluding that the treatment really does not work. We will discuss this approach using the most classic trials of the past and some notable examples among superiority trials (mostly phase 3 trials) published over the last years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di cardiologia
Giornale italiano di cardiologia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信