超声和神经刺激引导下两种不同地形入路治疗小腿坐骨和股神经联合阻滞的效果

IF 1.9 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Marcos Paulo Antunes de Lima , Renata Andrade Silva , Patrícia de Castro Duarte , Sérgio da Silva Rocha Júnior , Stephanie Elise Muniz Tavares Branco , Cahuê Francisco Rosa Paz , Pablo Ezequiel Otero , Rafael Resende Faleiros , Suzane Lilian Beier
{"title":"超声和神经刺激引导下两种不同地形入路治疗小腿坐骨和股神经联合阻滞的效果","authors":"Marcos Paulo Antunes de Lima ,&nbsp;Renata Andrade Silva ,&nbsp;Patrícia de Castro Duarte ,&nbsp;Sérgio da Silva Rocha Júnior ,&nbsp;Stephanie Elise Muniz Tavares Branco ,&nbsp;Cahuê Francisco Rosa Paz ,&nbsp;Pablo Ezequiel Otero ,&nbsp;Rafael Resende Faleiros ,&nbsp;Suzane Lilian Beier","doi":"10.1016/j.vas.2023.100315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To evaluate the sensory and motor effects promoted by a combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves using two approaches. Six calves were used, in a crossover study. Ultrasound combined with neurostimulation, was used to perform the following block combinations: the proximal approach (PA), which consisted of the association of the parasacral approach (sciatic nerve block) and ventral to the ilium approach (femoral nerve block); distal approach (DA) consisted of the association of a lateral approach to the pelvic limb approach (sciatic nerve block), and an inguinal approach, underneath the femoral trigone (femoral nerve block). Pressure algometry and motor function of the limb where evaluated. Mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) increase, and ataxia duration means were 9.5 ± 0.7 kg and 10.4 ± 3.9 hr for PA and 10.4 ± 3.9 kg and 12.7 ± 1.9 hr for DA, respectively with no significant difference. There was no significant difference between MNT elevation time and the duration of ataxia using the same approach. The DA treatment showed significant MNT elevation in 72% of the tested regions, while the PA treatment showed an elevation in 100% regions tested. Topographic approaches closer to where the spinal nerves emerge produced a larger desensitised area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37152,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Animal Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/48/main.PMC10539659.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of two different topographic approaches for combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves, guided by ultrasound and neurostimulation\",\"authors\":\"Marcos Paulo Antunes de Lima ,&nbsp;Renata Andrade Silva ,&nbsp;Patrícia de Castro Duarte ,&nbsp;Sérgio da Silva Rocha Júnior ,&nbsp;Stephanie Elise Muniz Tavares Branco ,&nbsp;Cahuê Francisco Rosa Paz ,&nbsp;Pablo Ezequiel Otero ,&nbsp;Rafael Resende Faleiros ,&nbsp;Suzane Lilian Beier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vas.2023.100315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To evaluate the sensory and motor effects promoted by a combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves using two approaches. Six calves were used, in a crossover study. Ultrasound combined with neurostimulation, was used to perform the following block combinations: the proximal approach (PA), which consisted of the association of the parasacral approach (sciatic nerve block) and ventral to the ilium approach (femoral nerve block); distal approach (DA) consisted of the association of a lateral approach to the pelvic limb approach (sciatic nerve block), and an inguinal approach, underneath the femoral trigone (femoral nerve block). Pressure algometry and motor function of the limb where evaluated. Mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) increase, and ataxia duration means were 9.5 ± 0.7 kg and 10.4 ± 3.9 hr for PA and 10.4 ± 3.9 kg and 12.7 ± 1.9 hr for DA, respectively with no significant difference. There was no significant difference between MNT elevation time and the duration of ataxia using the same approach. The DA treatment showed significant MNT elevation in 72% of the tested regions, while the PA treatment showed an elevation in 100% regions tested. Topographic approaches closer to where the spinal nerves emerge produced a larger desensitised area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/48/main.PMC10539659.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X23000327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X23000327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用两种方法评估坐骨神经和股神经联合阻滞对小腿感觉和运动的促进作用。在一项交叉研究中,使用了六头小牛。超声结合神经刺激用于进行以下阻滞组合:近端入路(PA),由肢端旁入路(坐骨神经阻滞)和髂骨腹侧入路(股神经阻滞)组成;远端入路(DA)由侧入路至骨盆肢体入路(坐骨神经阻滞)和股三角下方的腹股沟入路(股神经阻滞)组成。评估肢体的压力算法和运动功能。PA的机械伤害阈值(MNT)增加和共济失调持续时间平均值分别为9.5±0.7 kg和10.4±3.9小时,DA为10.4±3.9 kg和12.7±1.9小时,无显著差异。使用相同方法,MNT升高时间和共济失调持续时间之间没有显著差异。DA处理在72%的测试区域显示MNT显著升高,而PA处理在100%的测试区域中显示升高。地形接近脊神经出现的地方会产生更大的脱敏区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of two different topographic approaches for combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves, guided by ultrasound and neurostimulation

Effects of two different topographic approaches for combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves, guided by ultrasound and neurostimulation

Effects of two different topographic approaches for combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves, guided by ultrasound and neurostimulation

To evaluate the sensory and motor effects promoted by a combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves using two approaches. Six calves were used, in a crossover study. Ultrasound combined with neurostimulation, was used to perform the following block combinations: the proximal approach (PA), which consisted of the association of the parasacral approach (sciatic nerve block) and ventral to the ilium approach (femoral nerve block); distal approach (DA) consisted of the association of a lateral approach to the pelvic limb approach (sciatic nerve block), and an inguinal approach, underneath the femoral trigone (femoral nerve block). Pressure algometry and motor function of the limb where evaluated. Mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) increase, and ataxia duration means were 9.5 ± 0.7 kg and 10.4 ± 3.9 hr for PA and 10.4 ± 3.9 kg and 12.7 ± 1.9 hr for DA, respectively with no significant difference. There was no significant difference between MNT elevation time and the duration of ataxia using the same approach. The DA treatment showed significant MNT elevation in 72% of the tested regions, while the PA treatment showed an elevation in 100% regions tested. Topographic approaches closer to where the spinal nerves emerge produced a larger desensitised area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary and Animal Science
Veterinary and Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信