氟化二胺银对三种充填体修复材料与牙本质结合强度的影响。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2022-07-15
Nasrin Danaeifar, Amir Hossein Nejat, Zafar Cehreli, Richard W Ballard, Jeffrey T Johnson
{"title":"氟化二胺银对三种充填体修复材料与牙本质结合强度的影响。","authors":"Nasrin Danaeifar,&nbsp;Amir Hossein Nejat,&nbsp;Zafar Cehreli,&nbsp;Richard W Ballard,&nbsp;Jeffrey T Johnson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 38 percent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of three types of bulk-fill restorative materials to dentin. <b>Methods:</b> Eighty recently extracted deidentified, sound, human premolar teeth were sectioned to expose the mid-coronal dentin. A composite restorative material (ACTIVA™), a giomer (Beautifil<sup>®</sup>), and a high-viscosity glass ionomer (HVGI) cement (Equia Forte<sup>®</sup>) were used. The specimens were randomly assigned into eight groups (<small>N</small> equals 10 per group) according to the type of restorative material (ACTIVA<sup>™</sup>, Beautifil <sup>®</sup>, Equia Forte <sup>®</sup> with and without the conditioner) and pretreatment with one drop of 38 percent SDF. Both ACTIVA<sup>™</sup> and Beautifil <sup>®</sup> were bonded to dentin with a universal adhesive (Scotchbond™ Universal). The SBS was measured in a universal testing machine with a 0.5 mm per minute crosshead speed. One-way analysis of variance, Tukey's, and adjusted pairwise comparison tests were used for statistical analysis of data (α equals 0.05). <b>Results:</b> Pretreatment of dentin with SDF did not affect the SBS of the tested bulk-fill materials (P>0.05). The SBS of the ACTIVA<sup>™</sup> and Beautifil<sup>®</sup> groups was similar (P>0.05) and significantly higher than all Equia Forte<sup>®</sup> groups (P<0.001). Application of conditioner had no significant effect on the SBS values of Equia Forte<sup>®</sup> (adjusted P>0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> The application of silver diamine fluoride did not influence the shear bond strength of tested bulk-fill materials to dentin. Prior conditioning did not affect the SBS of the high-viscosity glass ionomer to dentin. The giomer and composite restorative materials showed significantly higher SBS than high-viscosity glass ionomer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19863,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"44 4","pages":"290-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Bond Strength of Three Types of Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials to Dentin.\",\"authors\":\"Nasrin Danaeifar,&nbsp;Amir Hossein Nejat,&nbsp;Zafar Cehreli,&nbsp;Richard W Ballard,&nbsp;Jeffrey T Johnson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 38 percent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of three types of bulk-fill restorative materials to dentin. <b>Methods:</b> Eighty recently extracted deidentified, sound, human premolar teeth were sectioned to expose the mid-coronal dentin. A composite restorative material (ACTIVA™), a giomer (Beautifil<sup>®</sup>), and a high-viscosity glass ionomer (HVGI) cement (Equia Forte<sup>®</sup>) were used. The specimens were randomly assigned into eight groups (<small>N</small> equals 10 per group) according to the type of restorative material (ACTIVA<sup>™</sup>, Beautifil <sup>®</sup>, Equia Forte <sup>®</sup> with and without the conditioner) and pretreatment with one drop of 38 percent SDF. Both ACTIVA<sup>™</sup> and Beautifil <sup>®</sup> were bonded to dentin with a universal adhesive (Scotchbond™ Universal). The SBS was measured in a universal testing machine with a 0.5 mm per minute crosshead speed. One-way analysis of variance, Tukey's, and adjusted pairwise comparison tests were used for statistical analysis of data (α equals 0.05). <b>Results:</b> Pretreatment of dentin with SDF did not affect the SBS of the tested bulk-fill materials (P>0.05). The SBS of the ACTIVA<sup>™</sup> and Beautifil<sup>®</sup> groups was similar (P>0.05) and significantly higher than all Equia Forte<sup>®</sup> groups (P<0.001). Application of conditioner had no significant effect on the SBS values of Equia Forte<sup>®</sup> (adjusted P>0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> The application of silver diamine fluoride did not influence the shear bond strength of tested bulk-fill materials to dentin. Prior conditioning did not affect the SBS of the high-viscosity glass ionomer to dentin. The giomer and composite restorative materials showed significantly higher SBS than high-viscosity glass ionomer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"290-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究38%二胺氟化银(SDF)对三种块状充填体修复材料与牙本质剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。方法:对80颗新近拔除的未识别、完好的人前磨牙进行切片,暴露中冠状牙本质。使用复合修复材料(ACTIVA™)、异构体(Beautifil®)和高粘度玻璃离子(HVGI)水泥(Equia Forte®)。根据修复材料的类型(ACTIVA™、Beautifil®、Equia Forte®加和不加护发素)和一滴38% SDF的预处理,将标本随机分为8组(每组N = 10)。ACTIVA™和Beautifil®都用通用粘合剂(Scotchbond™universal)粘接在牙本质上。SBS在通用试验机上以每分钟0.5 mm的十字头速度进行测量。资料采用单因素方差分析、Tukey’s检验和校正两两比较检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。结果:用SDF预处理牙本质对填充体材料的SBS无显著影响(P>0.05)。ACTIVA™组和Beautifil®组的SBS差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且显著高于Equia Forte®组(P®(经校正P>0.01)。结论:氟化二胺银的应用对块状充填材料与牙本质的剪切结合强度无影响。预处理对高黏度玻璃离聚体对牙本质的SBS没有影响。聚合物和复合修复材料的SBS明显高于高粘度玻璃离聚体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Bond Strength of Three Types of Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials to Dentin.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 38 percent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of three types of bulk-fill restorative materials to dentin. Methods: Eighty recently extracted deidentified, sound, human premolar teeth were sectioned to expose the mid-coronal dentin. A composite restorative material (ACTIVA™), a giomer (Beautifil®), and a high-viscosity glass ionomer (HVGI) cement (Equia Forte®) were used. The specimens were randomly assigned into eight groups (N equals 10 per group) according to the type of restorative material (ACTIVA, Beautifil ®, Equia Forte ® with and without the conditioner) and pretreatment with one drop of 38 percent SDF. Both ACTIVA and Beautifil ® were bonded to dentin with a universal adhesive (Scotchbond™ Universal). The SBS was measured in a universal testing machine with a 0.5 mm per minute crosshead speed. One-way analysis of variance, Tukey's, and adjusted pairwise comparison tests were used for statistical analysis of data (α equals 0.05). Results: Pretreatment of dentin with SDF did not affect the SBS of the tested bulk-fill materials (P>0.05). The SBS of the ACTIVA and Beautifil® groups was similar (P>0.05) and significantly higher than all Equia Forte® groups (P<0.001). Application of conditioner had no significant effect on the SBS values of Equia Forte® (adjusted P>0.01). Conclusions: The application of silver diamine fluoride did not influence the shear bond strength of tested bulk-fill materials to dentin. Prior conditioning did not affect the SBS of the high-viscosity glass ionomer to dentin. The giomer and composite restorative materials showed significantly higher SBS than high-viscosity glass ionomer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric dentistry
Pediatric dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINEPEDIATRI-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Dentistry is the official publication of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. It is published bi-monthly and is internationally recognized as the leading journal in the area of pediatric dentistry. The journal promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, case reports and abstracts of current pediatric dental research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信