眼球运动作为对渐进放大镜偏好的预测因子。

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Eye Movement Research Pub Date : 2022-06-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.16910/jemr.15.2.6
Pablo Concepcion-Grande, Amelia González, Eva Chamorro, José Miguel Cleva, José Alonso, Jose Antonio Gómez-Pedrero
{"title":"眼球运动作为对渐进放大镜偏好的预测因子。","authors":"Pablo Concepcion-Grande,&nbsp;Amelia González,&nbsp;Eva Chamorro,&nbsp;José Miguel Cleva,&nbsp;José Alonso,&nbsp;Jose Antonio Gómez-Pedrero","doi":"10.16910/jemr.15.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any correlation between the characteristics of the user's eye movements (EMs) and the preference of the user when wearing different Progressive power lenses (PPLs) distributions. An eye-tracker system with a sample rate of 120Hz and temporal resolution of 8.3ms (Tobii-X3-120) was used to register EMs of 38 PPL users when reading in a computer screen with 2 types of PPLs (PPLsoft and PPL-hard). Number of fixations, complete fixation time, fixation duration mean, saccade duration mean, saccade distance mean, and number of regressions were analyzed for 6 different regions of the computer screen. A statistically significant difference was observed between the characteristics of the user's EMs and the user's PPL subjective preference (p < 0.05*). Subjects that preferred the PPL-hard presented significantly lower complete fixation time, lower fixation duration mean and lower number of regressions than those subjects indicating a preference for the PPL-soft. Results of this study suggest that eye-tracking systems can be used as PPL design recommendation systems according to the user EMs performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669734/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye movements as a predictor of preference for progressive power lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Concepcion-Grande,&nbsp;Amelia González,&nbsp;Eva Chamorro,&nbsp;José Miguel Cleva,&nbsp;José Alonso,&nbsp;Jose Antonio Gómez-Pedrero\",\"doi\":\"10.16910/jemr.15.2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any correlation between the characteristics of the user's eye movements (EMs) and the preference of the user when wearing different Progressive power lenses (PPLs) distributions. An eye-tracker system with a sample rate of 120Hz and temporal resolution of 8.3ms (Tobii-X3-120) was used to register EMs of 38 PPL users when reading in a computer screen with 2 types of PPLs (PPLsoft and PPL-hard). Number of fixations, complete fixation time, fixation duration mean, saccade duration mean, saccade distance mean, and number of regressions were analyzed for 6 different regions of the computer screen. A statistically significant difference was observed between the characteristics of the user's EMs and the user's PPL subjective preference (p < 0.05*). Subjects that preferred the PPL-hard presented significantly lower complete fixation time, lower fixation duration mean and lower number of regressions than those subjects indicating a preference for the PPL-soft. Results of this study suggest that eye-tracking systems can be used as PPL design recommendation systems according to the user EMs performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eye Movement Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9669734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eye Movement Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.2.6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.2.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是确定当佩戴不同的渐进式放大镜(ppl)分布时,用户的眼动特征(em)与用户的偏好之间是否存在相关性。采用采样率为120Hz、时间分辨率为8.3ms (Tobii-X3-120)的眼动仪系统,对38名PPL用户在具有软、硬两种PPL的计算机屏幕上阅读时的em进行了记录。对计算机屏幕6个不同区域的注视次数、完全注视时间、注视持续时间均值、眼跳持续时间均值、眼跳距离均值和回归次数进行分析。用户的EMs特征与用户的PPL主观偏好之间存在统计学差异(p < 0.05*)。与偏爱PPL-soft的受试者相比,偏爱PPL-hard的受试者表现出更短的完全固定时间、更短的平均固定时间和更少的回归次数。本研究结果表明,眼动追踪系统可以根据用户EMs的表现作为PPL设计推荐系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Eye movements as a predictor of preference for progressive power lenses.

Eye movements as a predictor of preference for progressive power lenses.

Eye movements as a predictor of preference for progressive power lenses.

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any correlation between the characteristics of the user's eye movements (EMs) and the preference of the user when wearing different Progressive power lenses (PPLs) distributions. An eye-tracker system with a sample rate of 120Hz and temporal resolution of 8.3ms (Tobii-X3-120) was used to register EMs of 38 PPL users when reading in a computer screen with 2 types of PPLs (PPLsoft and PPL-hard). Number of fixations, complete fixation time, fixation duration mean, saccade duration mean, saccade distance mean, and number of regressions were analyzed for 6 different regions of the computer screen. A statistically significant difference was observed between the characteristics of the user's EMs and the user's PPL subjective preference (p < 0.05*). Subjects that preferred the PPL-hard presented significantly lower complete fixation time, lower fixation duration mean and lower number of regressions than those subjects indicating a preference for the PPL-soft. Results of this study suggest that eye-tracking systems can be used as PPL design recommendation systems according to the user EMs performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信