中国外卖平台经济中平台制度的两个故事。

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Journal of Chinese Sociology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1186/s40711-022-00170-5
Haitao Wei, Luyang Zhang, Peipei Deng, Guohui Li
{"title":"中国外卖平台经济中平台制度的两个故事。","authors":"Haitao Wei,&nbsp;Luyang Zhang,&nbsp;Peipei Deng,&nbsp;Guohui Li","doi":"10.1186/s40711-022-00170-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article brings the often-overlooked concept of the labor regime back to the study of China's food-delivery platform workers. Two tales of platform regimes emerge: individualized platform despotism and bureaucratized platform despotism, which apply to crowdsourcing couriers and dedicated delivery couriers, respectively. This study compares these two types of platform regimes in terms of their institutional foundation and labor organization. Despite different institutional arrangements and labor organization, both types of food-delivery couriers belong to a despotic platform regime revealing workers' subordination to the platform. In conclusion, it discusses the implications and limitations of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":52168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340696/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two tales of platform regimes in China's food-delivery platform economy.\",\"authors\":\"Haitao Wei,&nbsp;Luyang Zhang,&nbsp;Peipei Deng,&nbsp;Guohui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40711-022-00170-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article brings the often-overlooked concept of the labor regime back to the study of China's food-delivery platform workers. Two tales of platform regimes emerge: individualized platform despotism and bureaucratized platform despotism, which apply to crowdsourcing couriers and dedicated delivery couriers, respectively. This study compares these two types of platform regimes in terms of their institutional foundation and labor organization. Despite different institutional arrangements and labor organization, both types of food-delivery couriers belong to a despotic platform regime revealing workers' subordination to the platform. In conclusion, it discusses the implications and limitations of this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-022-00170-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-022-00170-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将经常被忽视的劳动制度概念重新引入到中国外卖平台工人的研究中。出现了两种平台政权的故事:个性化的平台专制和官僚化的平台专制,分别适用于众包快递员和专用快递员。本文从制度基础和劳动组织两个方面对这两类平台制度进行了比较。尽管两种外卖外卖的制度安排和劳动组织不同,但它们都属于一个专制的平台政权,暴露了工人对平台的从属关系。最后,讨论了本研究的意义和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two tales of platform regimes in China's food-delivery platform economy.

This article brings the often-overlooked concept of the labor regime back to the study of China's food-delivery platform workers. Two tales of platform regimes emerge: individualized platform despotism and bureaucratized platform despotism, which apply to crowdsourcing couriers and dedicated delivery couriers, respectively. This study compares these two types of platform regimes in terms of their institutional foundation and labor organization. Despite different institutional arrangements and labor organization, both types of food-delivery couriers belong to a despotic platform regime revealing workers' subordination to the platform. In conclusion, it discusses the implications and limitations of this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Sociology
Journal of Chinese Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信