荷包线缝合造口后真空辅助缝合的有效性:一项回顾性试验。

Fujita Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-25 DOI:10.20407/fmj.2021-007
Koji Masumori, Kotaro Maeda, Tsunekazu Hanai, Harunobu Sato, Yoshikazu Koide, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tomoyoshi Endo, Yeongcheol Cheong, Ichiro Uyama
{"title":"荷包线缝合造口后真空辅助缝合的有效性:一项回顾性试验。","authors":"Koji Masumori,&nbsp;Kotaro Maeda,&nbsp;Tsunekazu Hanai,&nbsp;Harunobu Sato,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Koide,&nbsp;Hiroshi Matsuoka,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Katsuno,&nbsp;Tomoyoshi Endo,&nbsp;Yeongcheol Cheong,&nbsp;Ichiro Uyama","doi":"10.20407/fmj.2021-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is a problematic complication after stoma closure. The purse string suture (PSS) technique eliminates this problem, but the area takes longer to heal. The present retrospective study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of a vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system for the promotion of wound healing after stoma closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing stoma closure with the PSS technique were divided into two groups: those treated with and without use of the VAC system. The volume of dead space and the size of the wound were measured after stoma closure in both groups. The same measurements were performed on days 3 and 7 after closure. The time needed for wound closure was also examined in both groups. Outcomes were also evaluated according to age, body mass index, operative time, bleeding volume, wound consistency, patient satisfaction, perioperative inflammatory response, occurrence of SSI, and hospitalization days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAC group comprised 31 patients, and the non-VAC group comprised 34 patients. The volume of dead space on days 3 and 7 after closure was significantly smaller in the VAC group than in the non-VAC group (P=0.006 and P<0.001, respectively). The number of SSIs was significantly lower in the VAC group than in the non-VAC group (P=0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dead space volume on days 3 and 7 after stoma closure with PSS significantly decreased by using the VAC system. The incidence of SSI after stoma closure also significantly decreased by using the VAC system.</p>","PeriodicalId":33657,"journal":{"name":"Fujita Medical Journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of vacuum-assisted closure after stoma closure with purse string suturing: a retrospective trial.\",\"authors\":\"Koji Masumori,&nbsp;Kotaro Maeda,&nbsp;Tsunekazu Hanai,&nbsp;Harunobu Sato,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Koide,&nbsp;Hiroshi Matsuoka,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Katsuno,&nbsp;Tomoyoshi Endo,&nbsp;Yeongcheol Cheong,&nbsp;Ichiro Uyama\",\"doi\":\"10.20407/fmj.2021-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is a problematic complication after stoma closure. The purse string suture (PSS) technique eliminates this problem, but the area takes longer to heal. The present retrospective study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of a vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system for the promotion of wound healing after stoma closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing stoma closure with the PSS technique were divided into two groups: those treated with and without use of the VAC system. The volume of dead space and the size of the wound were measured after stoma closure in both groups. The same measurements were performed on days 3 and 7 after closure. The time needed for wound closure was also examined in both groups. Outcomes were also evaluated according to age, body mass index, operative time, bleeding volume, wound consistency, patient satisfaction, perioperative inflammatory response, occurrence of SSI, and hospitalization days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAC group comprised 31 patients, and the non-VAC group comprised 34 patients. The volume of dead space on days 3 and 7 after closure was significantly smaller in the VAC group than in the non-VAC group (P=0.006 and P<0.001, respectively). The number of SSIs was significantly lower in the VAC group than in the non-VAC group (P=0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dead space volume on days 3 and 7 after stoma closure with PSS significantly decreased by using the VAC system. The incidence of SSI after stoma closure also significantly decreased by using the VAC system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fujita Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"67-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fujita Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fujita Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:手术部位感染(SSI)是造口术后的并发症。钱包线缝合(PSS)技术消除了这个问题,但该区域需要更长的时间来愈合。本回顾性研究旨在评估真空辅助缝合(VAC)系统对促进造口后伤口愈合的有效性。方法:将连续行PSS造口术的患者分为使用和不使用VAC系统两组。两组均在造口后测量死腔体积和创面大小。在关闭后第3天和第7天进行相同的测量。两组患者伤口愈合所需时间也比较。结果还根据年龄、体重指数、手术时间、出血量、伤口一致性、患者满意度、围手术期炎症反应、SSI的发生和住院天数进行评估。结果:VAC组31例,非VAC组34例。在闭合后第3天和第7天,VAC组的死腔体积明显小于非VAC组(P=0.006和P)。结论:使用VAC系统可显著降低PSS闭合后第3天和第7天的死腔体积。使用VAC系统也显著降低了造口后SSI的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Usefulness of vacuum-assisted closure after stoma closure with purse string suturing: a retrospective trial.

Usefulness of vacuum-assisted closure after stoma closure with purse string suturing: a retrospective trial.

Usefulness of vacuum-assisted closure after stoma closure with purse string suturing: a retrospective trial.

Objectives: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a problematic complication after stoma closure. The purse string suture (PSS) technique eliminates this problem, but the area takes longer to heal. The present retrospective study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of a vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system for the promotion of wound healing after stoma closure.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing stoma closure with the PSS technique were divided into two groups: those treated with and without use of the VAC system. The volume of dead space and the size of the wound were measured after stoma closure in both groups. The same measurements were performed on days 3 and 7 after closure. The time needed for wound closure was also examined in both groups. Outcomes were also evaluated according to age, body mass index, operative time, bleeding volume, wound consistency, patient satisfaction, perioperative inflammatory response, occurrence of SSI, and hospitalization days.

Results: The VAC group comprised 31 patients, and the non-VAC group comprised 34 patients. The volume of dead space on days 3 and 7 after closure was significantly smaller in the VAC group than in the non-VAC group (P=0.006 and P<0.001, respectively). The number of SSIs was significantly lower in the VAC group than in the non-VAC group (P=0.014).

Conclusion: The dead space volume on days 3 and 7 after stoma closure with PSS significantly decreased by using the VAC system. The incidence of SSI after stoma closure also significantly decreased by using the VAC system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信