使用机器学习方法,基于 CERAD-NAB 和灵活电池对阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆症和抑郁症进行神经心理学区分。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1080/13825585.2022.2138255
Clara Dominke, Alina Maria Fischer, Timo Grimmer, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Thomas Jahn
{"title":"使用机器学习方法,基于 CERAD-NAB 和灵活电池对阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆症和抑郁症进行神经心理学区分。","authors":"Clara Dominke, Alina Maria Fischer, Timo Grimmer, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Thomas Jahn","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2022.2138255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression (DEP) and dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) represent the most common neuropsychiatric disorders in elderly patients. Accurate differential diagnosis is indispensable to ensure appropriate treatment. However, DEP can yet mimic cognitive symptoms of DAT and patients with DAT often also present with depressive symptoms, impeding correct diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) approaches could eventually improve this discrimination using neuropsychological test data, but evidence is still missing. We therefore employed Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF) and conventional Logistic Regression (LR) to retrospectively predict the diagnoses of 189 elderly patients (68 DEP and 121 DAT) based on either the well-established Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease neuropsychological assessment battery (CERAD-NAB) or a flexible battery approach (FLEXBAT). The best performing combination consisted of FLEXBAT and NB, correctly classifying 87.0% of patients as either DAT or DEP. However, all accuracies were similar across algorithms and test batteries (83.0% - 87.0%). Accordingly, our study is the first to show that common ML algorithms with their default parameters can accurately differentiate between patients clinically diagnosed with DAT or DEP using neuropsychological test data, but do not necessarily outperform conventional LR.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CERAD-NAB and flexible battery based neuropsychological differentiation of Alzheimer's dementia and depression using machine learning approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Clara Dominke, Alina Maria Fischer, Timo Grimmer, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Thomas Jahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13825585.2022.2138255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Depression (DEP) and dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) represent the most common neuropsychiatric disorders in elderly patients. Accurate differential diagnosis is indispensable to ensure appropriate treatment. However, DEP can yet mimic cognitive symptoms of DAT and patients with DAT often also present with depressive symptoms, impeding correct diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) approaches could eventually improve this discrimination using neuropsychological test data, but evidence is still missing. We therefore employed Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF) and conventional Logistic Regression (LR) to retrospectively predict the diagnoses of 189 elderly patients (68 DEP and 121 DAT) based on either the well-established Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease neuropsychological assessment battery (CERAD-NAB) or a flexible battery approach (FLEXBAT). The best performing combination consisted of FLEXBAT and NB, correctly classifying 87.0% of patients as either DAT or DEP. However, all accuracies were similar across algorithms and test batteries (83.0% - 87.0%). Accordingly, our study is the first to show that common ML algorithms with their default parameters can accurately differentiate between patients clinically diagnosed with DAT or DEP using neuropsychological test data, but do not necessarily outperform conventional LR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2138255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2138255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抑郁症(DEP)和阿尔茨海默型痴呆症(DAT)是老年患者最常见的神经精神疾病。要确保治疗得当,准确的鉴别诊断必不可少。然而,DEP 可能会模仿 DAT 的认知症状,而 DAT 患者通常也会出现抑郁症状,从而妨碍了正确诊断。机器学习(ML)方法最终可以利用神经心理学测试数据提高辨别能力,但目前仍缺乏相关证据。因此,我们采用支持向量机 (SVM)、奈夫贝叶斯 (NB)、随机森林 (RF) 和传统逻辑回归 (LR) 对 189 名老年患者(68 名 DEP 和 121 名 DAT)的诊断进行了回顾性预测,预测依据的是成熟的阿尔茨海默病神经心理评估电池联盟 (CERAD-NAB) 或灵活的电池方法 (FLEXBAT)。表现最好的组合是 FLEXBAT 和 NB,可将 87.0% 的患者正确分类为 DAT 或 DEP。不过,不同算法和测试电池的准确率相似(83.0% - 87.0%)。因此,我们的研究首次表明,使用默认参数的普通 ML 算法可以通过神经心理测试数据准确区分临床诊断为 DAT 或 DEP 的患者,但并不一定优于传统的 LR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CERAD-NAB and flexible battery based neuropsychological differentiation of Alzheimer's dementia and depression using machine learning approaches.

Depression (DEP) and dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) represent the most common neuropsychiatric disorders in elderly patients. Accurate differential diagnosis is indispensable to ensure appropriate treatment. However, DEP can yet mimic cognitive symptoms of DAT and patients with DAT often also present with depressive symptoms, impeding correct diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) approaches could eventually improve this discrimination using neuropsychological test data, but evidence is still missing. We therefore employed Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF) and conventional Logistic Regression (LR) to retrospectively predict the diagnoses of 189 elderly patients (68 DEP and 121 DAT) based on either the well-established Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease neuropsychological assessment battery (CERAD-NAB) or a flexible battery approach (FLEXBAT). The best performing combination consisted of FLEXBAT and NB, correctly classifying 87.0% of patients as either DAT or DEP. However, all accuracies were similar across algorithms and test batteries (83.0% - 87.0%). Accordingly, our study is the first to show that common ML algorithms with their default parameters can accurately differentiate between patients clinically diagnosed with DAT or DEP using neuropsychological test data, but do not necessarily outperform conventional LR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信