等待期间的干预:识别和转诊未坚持接受大肠癌筛查的个人。

Emergency Cancer Care Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7
Beau Abar, Chanjun Syd Park, Preeti Dalawari, Howard Klausner, Chinwe Ogedegbe, Steven Valassis, Haran Koneswaran, David Adler, Keith Bradley
{"title":"等待期间的干预:识别和转诊未坚持接受大肠癌筛查的个人。","authors":"Beau Abar, Chanjun Syd Park, Preeti Dalawari, Howard Klausner, Chinwe Ogedegbe, Steven Valassis, Haran Koneswaran, David Adler, Keith Bradley","doi":"10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can adequately assess patients' adherence with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and provide referrals to individuals who are found to be non-adherent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RAs at seven heterogeneous hospitals in the USA queried non-emergent adult patients and visitors between the ages of 50 and 75. After obtaining verbal consent, the participant's adherence with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening was assessed. Participants found due for screening were provided with referrals to obtain these recommended screenings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8258 participants were surveyed on their colorectal cancer screening status, with RAs identifying 2063 participants who were not adherent with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and 67 for whom adherence could not be determined (total 27%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that RAs can identify a large volume of eligible adults who would benefit from colorectal cancer screening across a variety of emergency department settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":91016,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Cancer Care","volume":" ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Beau Abar, Chanjun Syd Park, Preeti Dalawari, Howard Klausner, Chinwe Ogedegbe, Steven Valassis, Haran Koneswaran, David Adler, Keith Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can adequately assess patients' adherence with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and provide referrals to individuals who are found to be non-adherent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RAs at seven heterogeneous hospitals in the USA queried non-emergent adult patients and visitors between the ages of 50 and 75. After obtaining verbal consent, the participant's adherence with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening was assessed. Participants found due for screening were provided with referrals to obtain these recommended screenings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8258 participants were surveyed on their colorectal cancer screening status, with RAs identifying 2063 participants who were not adherent with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and 67 for whom adherence could not be determined (total 27%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that RAs can identify a large volume of eligible adults who would benefit from colorectal cancer screening across a variety of emergency department settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管众多专业协会一致建议定期进行结直肠癌筛查,但仍有相当一部分符合条件的成年人没有坚持筛查。本研究调查了急诊科(ED)的研究助理(RA)能否充分评估患者对美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)提出的结直肠癌筛查建议的依从性,并对发现的不依从者进行转诊:美国七家不同医院的 RA 询问了 50 岁至 75 岁之间的非急诊成年患者和来访者。在获得口头同意后,对参与者是否遵守 USPSTF 大肠癌筛查指南进行评估。结果显示,共有 8258 名参与者接受了筛查:共有 8258 名参与者接受了大肠癌筛查状况调查,其中 RA 发现 2063 名参与者未遵守 USPSTF 大肠癌筛查指南,67 名参与者的遵守情况无法确定(总计 27%):我们的研究表明,RA 可以在各种急诊科环境中识别出大量符合条件的成年人,他们将从结肠直肠癌筛查中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.

Background: Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can adequately assess patients' adherence with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and provide referrals to individuals who are found to be non-adherent.

Methods: RAs at seven heterogeneous hospitals in the USA queried non-emergent adult patients and visitors between the ages of 50 and 75. After obtaining verbal consent, the participant's adherence with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening was assessed. Participants found due for screening were provided with referrals to obtain these recommended screenings.

Results: A total of 8258 participants were surveyed on their colorectal cancer screening status, with RAs identifying 2063 participants who were not adherent with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and 67 for whom adherence could not be determined (total 27%).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that RAs can identify a large volume of eligible adults who would benefit from colorectal cancer screening across a variety of emergency department settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信