[一种工具的心理测量特性3:收敛性、判别性、已知群体和标准效度]。

IF 1 Q3 NURSING
Eun-Hyun Lee
{"title":"[一种工具的心理测量特性3:收敛性、判别性、已知群体和标准效度]。","authors":"Eun-Hyun Lee","doi":"10.4069/kjwhn.2021.08.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.</p>","PeriodicalId":30467,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing","volume":"27 3","pages":"176-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328590/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Psychometric properties of an instrument 3: convergent, discriminant, known-groups, and criterion validity].\",\"authors\":\"Eun-Hyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4069/kjwhn.2021.08.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"176-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.08.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.08.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在评估收敛、判别和已知组效度之前,建议设计一个反映与其他比较工具或组的假设关系或差异的工具。对于效度,应该仔细选择测量相同结构的金标准仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Psychometric properties of an instrument 3: convergent, discriminant, known-groups, and criterion validity].

Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信