引产对妊娠24周后严重胎儿畸形终止妊娠:病例系列和文献系统回顾。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jessica Kiley, Ashley Turner, Catherine Nosal, Molly Beestrum, Jeffrey Dungan
{"title":"引产对妊娠24周后严重胎儿畸形终止妊娠:病例系列和文献系统回顾。","authors":"Jessica Kiley,&nbsp;Ashley Turner,&nbsp;Catherine Nosal,&nbsp;Molly Beestrum,&nbsp;Jeffrey Dungan","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2022.2102604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Under some circumstances, individuals choose to undergo pregnancy termination for foetal anomalies in the second half of pregnancy. This report provides objective information on the clinical management of such cases and a systematic review of the literature on labour induction outcomes for third-trimester abortion using mifepristone-misoprostol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study is a case series describing outcomes for labour induction abortion for foetal anomalies, at gestational age 24 weeks and beyond. A systematic review was performed, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Two independent authors reviewed and quality assessed the data from the articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a two-year period, 15 patients met inclusion criteria. Fourteen patients received mifepristone and misoprostol, and one received oxytocin. All delivered vaginally. Thirteen patients delivered within 24 hours of the first misoprostol dose, and half delivered within 12 hours. The average interval from misoprostol initiation to foetal expulsion was 15.5 hours in our series. The systematic review identified nine articles for inclusion, all retrospective studies. Labour induction protocols for mifepristone-misoprostol, reporting of gestational age, and key comparisons varied greatly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The case series illustrates successful termination of pregnancy primarily using combined mifepristone-misoprostol. Certainty of current evidence is low, based on the GRADE framework. Future research is necessary on third-trimester outcomes with mifepristone-misoprostol.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labour induction for termination of pregnancy with severe fetal anomalies after 24 weeks' gestation: a case series and systematic review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Kiley,&nbsp;Ashley Turner,&nbsp;Catherine Nosal,&nbsp;Molly Beestrum,&nbsp;Jeffrey Dungan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2022.2102604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Under some circumstances, individuals choose to undergo pregnancy termination for foetal anomalies in the second half of pregnancy. This report provides objective information on the clinical management of such cases and a systematic review of the literature on labour induction outcomes for third-trimester abortion using mifepristone-misoprostol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study is a case series describing outcomes for labour induction abortion for foetal anomalies, at gestational age 24 weeks and beyond. A systematic review was performed, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Two independent authors reviewed and quality assessed the data from the articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a two-year period, 15 patients met inclusion criteria. Fourteen patients received mifepristone and misoprostol, and one received oxytocin. All delivered vaginally. Thirteen patients delivered within 24 hours of the first misoprostol dose, and half delivered within 12 hours. The average interval from misoprostol initiation to foetal expulsion was 15.5 hours in our series. The systematic review identified nine articles for inclusion, all retrospective studies. Labour induction protocols for mifepristone-misoprostol, reporting of gestational age, and key comparisons varied greatly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The case series illustrates successful termination of pregnancy primarily using combined mifepristone-misoprostol. Certainty of current evidence is low, based on the GRADE framework. Future research is necessary on third-trimester outcomes with mifepristone-misoprostol.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2022.2102604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2022.2102604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在某些情况下,个体选择在妊娠后半期因胎儿异常而终止妊娠。本报告提供了这类病例的临床管理的客观信息,并系统地回顾了有关使用米非司酮-米索前列醇进行妊娠晚期人工流产引产结果的文献。材料和方法:该研究是一个案例系列描述结果引产流产胎儿异常,在胎龄24周及以上。检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,进行系统评价。两位独立作者对文章中的数据进行了审查和质量评估。结果:在两年的时间里,15例患者符合纳入标准。14例患者接受米非司酮和米索前列醇治疗,1例接受催产素治疗。都是顺产。13例患者在第一次米索前列醇剂量后24小时内分娩,一半患者在12小时内分娩。在我们的研究中,米索前列醇起始到胎儿排出的平均间隔时间为15.5小时。系统评价确定了9篇纳入的文章,均为回顾性研究。米非司酮-米索前列醇引产方案、胎龄报告和关键比较差异很大。结论:病例系列说明成功终止妊娠主要使用联合米非司酮-米索前列醇。基于GRADE框架,当前证据的确定性较低。米非司酮-米索前列醇在妊娠晚期的疗效有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labour induction for termination of pregnancy with severe fetal anomalies after 24 weeks' gestation: a case series and systematic review of the literature.

Purpose: Under some circumstances, individuals choose to undergo pregnancy termination for foetal anomalies in the second half of pregnancy. This report provides objective information on the clinical management of such cases and a systematic review of the literature on labour induction outcomes for third-trimester abortion using mifepristone-misoprostol.

Materials and methods: The study is a case series describing outcomes for labour induction abortion for foetal anomalies, at gestational age 24 weeks and beyond. A systematic review was performed, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Two independent authors reviewed and quality assessed the data from the articles.

Results: During a two-year period, 15 patients met inclusion criteria. Fourteen patients received mifepristone and misoprostol, and one received oxytocin. All delivered vaginally. Thirteen patients delivered within 24 hours of the first misoprostol dose, and half delivered within 12 hours. The average interval from misoprostol initiation to foetal expulsion was 15.5 hours in our series. The systematic review identified nine articles for inclusion, all retrospective studies. Labour induction protocols for mifepristone-misoprostol, reporting of gestational age, and key comparisons varied greatly.

Conclusions: The case series illustrates successful termination of pregnancy primarily using combined mifepristone-misoprostol. Certainty of current evidence is low, based on the GRADE framework. Future research is necessary on third-trimester outcomes with mifepristone-misoprostol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信