审查枪支政策的综合控制方法。

3区 医学
Current Epidemiology Reports Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-19 DOI:10.1007/s40471-022-00294-9
Michelle Degli Esposti, Douglas Wiebe, Elinore Kaufman, Carl Bonander
{"title":"审查枪支政策的综合控制方法。","authors":"Michelle Degli Esposti,&nbsp;Douglas Wiebe,&nbsp;Elinore Kaufman,&nbsp;Carl Bonander","doi":"10.1007/s40471-022-00294-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Firearm policies have the potential to alleviate the public health burden of firearm violence, yet it is unclear which policies are effective. The current review aims to summarize studies that use synthetic control methods to overcome previous methodological limitations when examining the impacts of firearm policies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evidence from studies using synthetic control methods find compelling evidence that purchasing licensing laws for all individuals (e.g., permit-to-purchase) have a preventive effect on firearm deaths. Otherwise, the effects of other firearm policies targeting firearm availability, ownership, sales, and use varied across studies and contexts.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Synthetic control evaluations find heterogenous effects of firearm policies, suggesting that previous inconsistent findings might reflect their varying impacts across regions rather than methodological limitations alone. Future research should aim to exploit the complementary biases of synthetic control methods to triangulate evidence across evaluation approaches and understand why firearm policies have differential impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"109-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295100/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic Control Methodology for Examining Firearm Policy.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Degli Esposti,&nbsp;Douglas Wiebe,&nbsp;Elinore Kaufman,&nbsp;Carl Bonander\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40471-022-00294-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Firearm policies have the potential to alleviate the public health burden of firearm violence, yet it is unclear which policies are effective. The current review aims to summarize studies that use synthetic control methods to overcome previous methodological limitations when examining the impacts of firearm policies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evidence from studies using synthetic control methods find compelling evidence that purchasing licensing laws for all individuals (e.g., permit-to-purchase) have a preventive effect on firearm deaths. Otherwise, the effects of other firearm policies targeting firearm availability, ownership, sales, and use varied across studies and contexts.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Synthetic control evaluations find heterogenous effects of firearm policies, suggesting that previous inconsistent findings might reflect their varying impacts across regions rather than methodological limitations alone. Future research should aim to exploit the complementary biases of synthetic control methods to triangulate evidence across evaluation approaches and understand why firearm policies have differential impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"109-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295100/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00294-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00294-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

审查目的:枪支政策有可能减轻枪支暴力造成的公共健康负担,但目前尚不清楚哪些政策是有效的。当前的审查旨在总结在审查枪支政策影响时使用综合控制方法来克服先前方法局限性的研究。最近的调查结果:使用综合控制方法进行的研究发现了令人信服的证据,表明针对所有个人的购买许可法(例如,购买许可证)对枪支死亡具有预防作用。此外,针对枪支可得性、所有权、销售和使用的其他枪支政策的影响因研究和背景而异。摘要:综合控制评估发现了枪支政策的异质效应,这表明之前不一致的发现可能反映了它们在不同地区的不同影响,而不仅仅是方法上的局限性。未来的研究应致力于利用综合控制方法的互补偏差,对各种评估方法的证据进行三角测量,并理解枪支政策为何会产生不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Synthetic Control Methodology for Examining Firearm Policy.

Synthetic Control Methodology for Examining Firearm Policy.

Purpose of review: Firearm policies have the potential to alleviate the public health burden of firearm violence, yet it is unclear which policies are effective. The current review aims to summarize studies that use synthetic control methods to overcome previous methodological limitations when examining the impacts of firearm policies.

Recent findings: Evidence from studies using synthetic control methods find compelling evidence that purchasing licensing laws for all individuals (e.g., permit-to-purchase) have a preventive effect on firearm deaths. Otherwise, the effects of other firearm policies targeting firearm availability, ownership, sales, and use varied across studies and contexts.

Summary: Synthetic control evaluations find heterogenous effects of firearm policies, suggesting that previous inconsistent findings might reflect their varying impacts across regions rather than methodological limitations alone. Future research should aim to exploit the complementary biases of synthetic control methods to triangulate evidence across evaluation approaches and understand why firearm policies have differential impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信