{"title":"五种瓷修复系统与氧化锆基础结构的剪切粘接强度。","authors":"Sirageddin Al-Hmadi, Funda Erol, Melahat Guven Celik","doi":"10.26650/eor.2022962372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Disk-shaped zirconia samples (n=50) were divided into five groups (n=10) according to repairing system type. Each repair system was applied to the zirconium samples and a hybrid composite was used for repairing. Shear bond testing of all groups was carried out using a universal testing machine after thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repair systems demonstrated no significant difference in repairing zirconia except Single Bond. Single Bond was the weakest in repairing the infrastructures. The highest and lowest mean bond strength values for the zirconia groups were 18,91 MPa and 3,63 MPa, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.</p>","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"56 2","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/80/08/eor-056-055.PMC9377777.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear bond strengths of five porcelain repair systems to zirconia infrastructures.\",\"authors\":\"Sirageddin Al-Hmadi, Funda Erol, Melahat Guven Celik\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/eor.2022962372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Disk-shaped zirconia samples (n=50) were divided into five groups (n=10) according to repairing system type. Each repair system was applied to the zirconium samples and a hybrid composite was used for repairing. Shear bond testing of all groups was carried out using a universal testing machine after thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repair systems demonstrated no significant difference in repairing zirconia except Single Bond. Single Bond was the weakest in repairing the infrastructures. The highest and lowest mean bond strength values for the zirconia groups were 18,91 MPa and 3,63 MPa, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Oral Research\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"55-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/80/08/eor-056-055.PMC9377777.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Oral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022962372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022962372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：本研究旨在探讨五种瓷修复体系对复合材料和氧化锆基础结构剪切粘接强度的影响，并确定热循环后的粘接失效模式：根据修复系统类型将盘状氧化锆样品（n=50）分为五组（n=10）。每种修复系统都应用于锆样品，并使用混合复合材料进行修复。在热循环后，使用万能试验机对所有组别进行了剪切粘接测试：结果：除单一粘结剂外，修复系统在修复氧化锆方面没有明显差异。单一粘结剂在修复基础设施方面的作用最弱。氧化锆组的最高和最低平均粘接强度值分别为 18.91 兆帕和 3.63 兆帕：结论：Ivoclar、Clearfil 和 Bisco 这三种修复系统比 Single Bond 和 Ultradent 修复系统在修复氧化锆方面更有效，它们的粘接失效模式既有混合型的，也有粘接型的。
Shear bond strengths of five porcelain repair systems to zirconia infrastructures.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling.
Materials and methods: Disk-shaped zirconia samples (n=50) were divided into five groups (n=10) according to repairing system type. Each repair system was applied to the zirconium samples and a hybrid composite was used for repairing. Shear bond testing of all groups was carried out using a universal testing machine after thermocycling.
Results: Repair systems demonstrated no significant difference in repairing zirconia except Single Bond. Single Bond was the weakest in repairing the infrastructures. The highest and lowest mean bond strength values for the zirconia groups were 18,91 MPa and 3,63 MPa, respectively.
Conclusion: The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
