上颌全-四种植体固定义齿不同框架的力学响应:三维有限元分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Zekiye Begüm Güçlü, Ayhan Gürbüz, Gonca Deste Gökay, Rukiye Durkan, Perihan Oyar
{"title":"上颌全-四种植体固定义齿不同框架的力学响应:三维有限元分析。","authors":"Zekiye Begüm Güçlü,&nbsp;Ayhan Gürbüz,&nbsp;Gonca Deste Gökay,&nbsp;Rukiye Durkan,&nbsp;Perihan Oyar","doi":"10.1515/bmt-2022-0176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study's purpose is to assess the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, implants, and prosthetic framework using two different posterior implant angles. All-on-four maxillary prostheses fabricated from feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) and feldspathic-ceramic-veneered cobalt-chromium (CoCr) were designed with 17 or 30-degree-angled posterior implants. Posterior cantilever and frontal vertical loads were applied to all models. The distribution of maximum and minimum principal stresses (σmax and σmin) and von Mises stress (σVM) was evaluated. Under posterior cantilever load, with an increase in posterior implant angle, σmax decreased by 4 and 7 MPa in the cortical bone when ZLS and CoCr were used as a prosthetic framework, respectively. Regardless of the framework material, 17-degree-angled posterior implants showed the highest σVM (541.36 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 110.79 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Regardless of the posterior implant angle, ZLS framework showed the highest σVM (91.59 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 218.99 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Increasing implant angle from 17 to 30° caused a decrease in σmax values in the cortical bone. Designs with 30-degree posterior implant angles and ZLS framework material may be preferred in All-on-four implant-supported fixed complete dentures.</p>","PeriodicalId":8900,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zekiye Begüm Güçlü,&nbsp;Ayhan Gürbüz,&nbsp;Gonca Deste Gökay,&nbsp;Rukiye Durkan,&nbsp;Perihan Oyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bmt-2022-0176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study's purpose is to assess the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, implants, and prosthetic framework using two different posterior implant angles. All-on-four maxillary prostheses fabricated from feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) and feldspathic-ceramic-veneered cobalt-chromium (CoCr) were designed with 17 or 30-degree-angled posterior implants. Posterior cantilever and frontal vertical loads were applied to all models. The distribution of maximum and minimum principal stresses (σmax and σmin) and von Mises stress (σVM) was evaluated. Under posterior cantilever load, with an increase in posterior implant angle, σmax decreased by 4 and 7 MPa in the cortical bone when ZLS and CoCr were used as a prosthetic framework, respectively. Regardless of the framework material, 17-degree-angled posterior implants showed the highest σVM (541.36 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 110.79 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Regardless of the posterior implant angle, ZLS framework showed the highest σVM (91.59 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 218.99 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Increasing implant angle from 17 to 30° caused a decrease in σmax values in the cortical bone. Designs with 30-degree posterior implant angles and ZLS framework material may be preferred in All-on-four implant-supported fixed complete dentures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是评估应力分布在种植体周围骨,种植体和假体框架使用两种不同的后种植角度。采用长石-陶瓷贴面的氧化锆增强硅酸锂(ZLS)和长石-陶瓷贴面的钴铬(CoCr)制备的全对四种植体,分别采用17或30度角的后牙种植体。所有模型均施加后悬臂载荷和正面垂直载荷。评价了最大、最小主应力(σmax、σmin)和von Mises应力(σVM)的分布。在后向悬臂载荷作用下,采用ZLS和CoCr作为假体框架时,随着后向种植体角度的增加,皮质骨的σmax分别降低了4和7 MPa。无论何种框架材料,17度角后牙种植体在后端悬臂载荷下的σVM最高(541.36 MPa);110.79 MPa(正面垂直荷载)值。无论后牙种植角度如何,ZLS框架在后牙悬臂载荷下的σVM最高(91.59 MPa);218.99 MPa(正面垂直荷载)值。当种植体角度从17°增加到30°时,皮质骨的σmax值减小。在all -on- 4种植体支持的固定全口义齿中,种植体后牙角为30度的设计和ZLS框架材料是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.

This study's purpose is to assess the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, implants, and prosthetic framework using two different posterior implant angles. All-on-four maxillary prostheses fabricated from feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) and feldspathic-ceramic-veneered cobalt-chromium (CoCr) were designed with 17 or 30-degree-angled posterior implants. Posterior cantilever and frontal vertical loads were applied to all models. The distribution of maximum and minimum principal stresses (σmax and σmin) and von Mises stress (σVM) was evaluated. Under posterior cantilever load, with an increase in posterior implant angle, σmax decreased by 4 and 7 MPa in the cortical bone when ZLS and CoCr were used as a prosthetic framework, respectively. Regardless of the framework material, 17-degree-angled posterior implants showed the highest σVM (541.36 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 110.79 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Regardless of the posterior implant angle, ZLS framework showed the highest σVM (91.59 MPa under posterior cantilever load; 218.99 MPa under frontal vertical load) values. Increasing implant angle from 17 to 30° caused a decrease in σmax values in the cortical bone. Designs with 30-degree posterior implant angles and ZLS framework material may be preferred in All-on-four implant-supported fixed complete dentures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik (BMT) is a high-quality forum for the exchange of knowledge in the fields of biomedical engineering, medical information technology and biotechnology/bioengineering. As an established journal with a tradition of more than 60 years, BMT addresses engineers, natural scientists, and clinicians working in research, industry, or clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信