解读法医残疾和相关评估中的症状有效性测试失败:当一次失败的呼救变得有意义时。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2107929
Gerald Young
{"title":"解读法医残疾和相关评估中的症状有效性测试失败:当一次失败的呼救变得有意义时。","authors":"Gerald Young","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2107929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dandachi-FitzGerald et al. (2022), published the article \"Cry for help as a root cause of poor symptom validity: A critical note,\" in <i>Applied Neuropsychology: Adult</i> [Advance Online], arguing that the cry for help in forensic disability and related assessments is not a valid interpretation for poor symptom validity test results. This rebuttal contests the criticisms of the use of the cry for help in this context, as presented in Young (2019); \"The Cry for help in a psychological injury and law: Concepts and review\" that appeared in <i>Psychological Injury and Law</i>, Vol. 12, pp. 225-237. It calls for more programmatic research, for example, based on the cry for help questionnaire suggested by the author. In particular, it indicates, for example, that one SVT test failure in a test battery constitutes an assessment result that could allow for attributing the cry for help, everything else being equal. It suggests that the adaptational theory explains the cry for help as much as malingering. It suggests practice and court recommendations that will allow better rebuttals of unethical assessors who overuse/misuse/abuse the cry for help interpretation of poor symptom validity test results in forensic disability and related assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting symptom validity test fails in forensic disability and related assessments: When the cry for help for one fail makes sense.\",\"authors\":\"Gerald Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2022.2107929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dandachi-FitzGerald et al. (2022), published the article \\\"Cry for help as a root cause of poor symptom validity: A critical note,\\\" in <i>Applied Neuropsychology: Adult</i> [Advance Online], arguing that the cry for help in forensic disability and related assessments is not a valid interpretation for poor symptom validity test results. This rebuttal contests the criticisms of the use of the cry for help in this context, as presented in Young (2019); \\\"The Cry for help in a psychological injury and law: Concepts and review\\\" that appeared in <i>Psychological Injury and Law</i>, Vol. 12, pp. 225-237. It calls for more programmatic research, for example, based on the cry for help questionnaire suggested by the author. In particular, it indicates, for example, that one SVT test failure in a test battery constitutes an assessment result that could allow for attributing the cry for help, everything else being equal. It suggests that the adaptational theory explains the cry for help as much as malingering. It suggests practice and court recommendations that will allow better rebuttals of unethical assessors who overuse/misuse/abuse the cry for help interpretation of poor symptom validity test results in forensic disability and related assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2107929\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2107929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Dandachi-FitzGerald 等人(2022 年)在《应用神经心理学》(Applied Neuropsychology)杂志上发表了文章《呼救是症状有效性差的根本原因:应用神经心理学》(Applied Neuropsychology:Adult [Advance Online]》上发表了《求救作为症状效度差的根本原因:一个批判性说明》一文,认为在法医残疾和相关评估中,求救并不是对症状效度差的测试结果的有效解释。这篇反驳文章对 Young (2019);"心理伤害和法律中的呼救:概念与回顾",该文发表于《心理伤害与法律》第 12 卷,第 225-237 页。该报告呼吁开展更多的方案研究,例如基于作者建议的求助问卷。例如,它特别指出,在其他条件相同的情况下,一次 SVT 测试失败构成的评估结果可以归因于求助。报告认为,适应性理论可以解释呼救,也可以解释装病。报告还提出了一些实践和法庭建议,以便更好地反驳那些不道德的评估师,他们在法医残疾和相关评估中过度使用/误用/滥用求救信号对不良症状有效性测试结果的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpreting symptom validity test fails in forensic disability and related assessments: When the cry for help for one fail makes sense.

Dandachi-FitzGerald et al. (2022), published the article "Cry for help as a root cause of poor symptom validity: A critical note," in Applied Neuropsychology: Adult [Advance Online], arguing that the cry for help in forensic disability and related assessments is not a valid interpretation for poor symptom validity test results. This rebuttal contests the criticisms of the use of the cry for help in this context, as presented in Young (2019); "The Cry for help in a psychological injury and law: Concepts and review" that appeared in Psychological Injury and Law, Vol. 12, pp. 225-237. It calls for more programmatic research, for example, based on the cry for help questionnaire suggested by the author. In particular, it indicates, for example, that one SVT test failure in a test battery constitutes an assessment result that could allow for attributing the cry for help, everything else being equal. It suggests that the adaptational theory explains the cry for help as much as malingering. It suggests practice and court recommendations that will allow better rebuttals of unethical assessors who overuse/misuse/abuse the cry for help interpretation of poor symptom validity test results in forensic disability and related assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信