“在这个行业,如果你想问心无愧是非常困难的”:加纳的制药治理和实地道德劳工。

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2022-07-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2022.2103899
Kate Hampshire, Simon Mariwah, Daniel Amoako-Sakyi, Heather Hamill
{"title":"“在这个行业,如果你想问心无愧是非常困难的”:加纳的制药治理和实地道德劳工。","authors":"Kate Hampshire,&nbsp;Simon Mariwah,&nbsp;Daniel Amoako-Sakyi,&nbsp;Heather Hamill","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2022.2103899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The governance of pharmaceutical medicines entails complex ethical decisions that should, in theory, be the responsibility of democratically accountable government agencies. However, in many Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), regulatory and health systems constraints mean that many people still lack access to safe, appropriate and affordable medication, posing significant ethical challenges for those working on the \"front line\". Drawing on 18 months of fieldwork in Ghana, we present three detailed case studies of individuals in this position: an urban retail pharmacist, a rural over-the-counter medicine retailer, and a local inspector. Through these case studies, we consider the significant burden of \"ethical labour\" borne by those operating \"on the ground\", who navigate complex moral, legal and business imperatives in real time and with very real consequences for those they serve. The paper ends with a reflection on the tensions between abstract, generalised ethical frameworks based on high-level principles, and a pragmatic, contingent ethics-in-practice that foregrounds immediate individual needs - a tension rooted in the gap between the theory and the reality of pharmaceutical governance that shifts the burden of ethical labour downwards and perpetuates long-term public health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331207/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"<i>It is very difficult in this business if you want to have a good conscience</i>\\\": pharmaceutical governance and on-the-ground ethical labour in Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Hampshire,&nbsp;Simon Mariwah,&nbsp;Daniel Amoako-Sakyi,&nbsp;Heather Hamill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11287462.2022.2103899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The governance of pharmaceutical medicines entails complex ethical decisions that should, in theory, be the responsibility of democratically accountable government agencies. However, in many Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), regulatory and health systems constraints mean that many people still lack access to safe, appropriate and affordable medication, posing significant ethical challenges for those working on the \\\"front line\\\". Drawing on 18 months of fieldwork in Ghana, we present three detailed case studies of individuals in this position: an urban retail pharmacist, a rural over-the-counter medicine retailer, and a local inspector. Through these case studies, we consider the significant burden of \\\"ethical labour\\\" borne by those operating \\\"on the ground\\\", who navigate complex moral, legal and business imperatives in real time and with very real consequences for those they serve. The paper ends with a reflection on the tensions between abstract, generalised ethical frameworks based on high-level principles, and a pragmatic, contingent ethics-in-practice that foregrounds immediate individual needs - a tension rooted in the gap between the theory and the reality of pharmaceutical governance that shifts the burden of ethical labour downwards and perpetuates long-term public health risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Bioethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331207/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2022.2103899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2022.2103899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

药物的治理涉及复杂的伦理决策,理论上,这应该是民主问责的政府机构的责任。然而,在许多低收入和中等收入国家,监管和卫生系统的限制意味着许多人仍然无法获得安全、适当和负担得起的药物,这对在“一线”工作的人构成了重大的伦理挑战。根据在加纳18个月的实地考察,我们提出了三个详细的案例研究:城市零售药剂师、农村非处方药零售商和当地检查员。通过这些案例研究,我们考虑到那些“在现场”操作的人所承担的“道德劳动”的重大负担,他们实时处理复杂的道德、法律和商业要求,并为他们所服务的人带来非常现实的后果。论文最后反思了基于高级原则的抽象的、概括的伦理框架与强调个人直接需求的实用的、偶然的实践伦理之间的紧张关系——这种紧张关系植根于制药治理理论与现实之间的差距,这种差距将伦理劳动的负担向下转移,并使长期的公共卫生风险长期存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"It is very difficult in this business if you want to have a good conscience": pharmaceutical governance and on-the-ground ethical labour in Ghana.

The governance of pharmaceutical medicines entails complex ethical decisions that should, in theory, be the responsibility of democratically accountable government agencies. However, in many Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), regulatory and health systems constraints mean that many people still lack access to safe, appropriate and affordable medication, posing significant ethical challenges for those working on the "front line". Drawing on 18 months of fieldwork in Ghana, we present three detailed case studies of individuals in this position: an urban retail pharmacist, a rural over-the-counter medicine retailer, and a local inspector. Through these case studies, we consider the significant burden of "ethical labour" borne by those operating "on the ground", who navigate complex moral, legal and business imperatives in real time and with very real consequences for those they serve. The paper ends with a reflection on the tensions between abstract, generalised ethical frameworks based on high-level principles, and a pragmatic, contingent ethics-in-practice that foregrounds immediate individual needs - a tension rooted in the gap between the theory and the reality of pharmaceutical governance that shifts the burden of ethical labour downwards and perpetuates long-term public health risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信