背部和颈部疼痛:与急性和慢性疼痛相关的颞下颌关节紊乱的比较。

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jack Botros, Mervyn Gornitsky, Firoozeh Samim, Zovinar der Khatchadourian, Ana Miriam Velly
{"title":"背部和颈部疼痛:与急性和慢性疼痛相关的颞下颌关节紊乱的比较。","authors":"Jack Botros, Mervyn Gornitsky, Firoozeh Samim, Zovinar der Khatchadourian, Ana Miriam Velly","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2022.2067032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are common and cause persistent pain. Comorbidities are associated with TMDs and can affect the effectiveness of their treatments. The literature is lacking enough evidence on the difference between acute and chronic pain, particularly in TMDs. Investigating this difference could highlight potential risk factors for the transition from acute to chronic pain-related TMDs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the likelihood of back and neck pain (BP, NP) between acute and chronic pain-related TMDs (AP-TMD, CP-TMD) as defined by pain duration and pain-related disability.‎.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with AP-TMDs (≤3 months) and CP-TMDs (>3 months) were recruited according to the diagnostic criteria and research diagnostic criteria of TMD. BP and NP were assessed using a self-reported checklist. CP-TMDs defined by disability (chronic disability) and depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using validated instruments. Logistic regression analyses were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 487 adults with AP-TMD (<i>n</i> = 118) and CP-TMD (<i>n</i> = 369). Relative to AP-TMD, participants with CP-TMD had twice the odds of reporting NP (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17‎, 95% CI 1.27-3.71) but not BP ‎‎(OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.57-1.64). Participants with chronic disability were twice as likely to report NP ‎(OR = 1.95‎, 95% CI 1.20-3.17‎) but not BP (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.69-1.82)‎ compared to those without. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and anxiety and depression symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, results suggest that central dysregulation or trigeminocervical convergence mechanisms are implicated in the process of pain-related TMD chronification and highlight the relevance of considering disability when defining CP-TMDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back and neck pain: A comparison between acute and chronic pain-related Temporomandibular Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Jack Botros, Mervyn Gornitsky, Firoozeh Samim, Zovinar der Khatchadourian, Ana Miriam Velly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24740527.2022.2067032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are common and cause persistent pain. Comorbidities are associated with TMDs and can affect the effectiveness of their treatments. The literature is lacking enough evidence on the difference between acute and chronic pain, particularly in TMDs. Investigating this difference could highlight potential risk factors for the transition from acute to chronic pain-related TMDs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the likelihood of back and neck pain (BP, NP) between acute and chronic pain-related TMDs (AP-TMD, CP-TMD) as defined by pain duration and pain-related disability.‎.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with AP-TMDs (≤3 months) and CP-TMDs (>3 months) were recruited according to the diagnostic criteria and research diagnostic criteria of TMD. BP and NP were assessed using a self-reported checklist. CP-TMDs defined by disability (chronic disability) and depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using validated instruments. Logistic regression analyses were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 487 adults with AP-TMD (<i>n</i> = 118) and CP-TMD (<i>n</i> = 369). Relative to AP-TMD, participants with CP-TMD had twice the odds of reporting NP (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17‎, 95% CI 1.27-3.71) but not BP ‎‎(OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.57-1.64). Participants with chronic disability were twice as likely to report NP ‎(OR = 1.95‎, 95% CI 1.20-3.17‎) but not BP (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.69-1.82)‎ compared to those without. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and anxiety and depression symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, results suggest that central dysregulation or trigeminocervical convergence mechanisms are implicated in the process of pain-related TMD chronification and highlight the relevance of considering disability when defining CP-TMDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9255212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2022.2067032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2022.2067032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMDs)是一种常见疾病,会导致持续性疼痛。并发症与 TMD 相关,会影响治疗效果。关于急性疼痛和慢性疼痛之间的区别,尤其是在 TMD 中的区别,文献缺乏足够的证据。目的:比较急性和慢性疼痛相关 TMDs(AP-TMD、CP-TMD)之间出现背部和颈部疼痛(BP、NP)的可能性,以疼痛持续时间和疼痛相关残疾程度来定义:根据TMD的诊断标准和研究诊断标准,招募患有AP-TMD(≤3个月)和CP-TMD(>3个月)的参与者。采用自我报告核对表对血压和脉搏进行评估。CP-TMD 由残疾(慢性残疾)以及抑郁和焦虑症状定义,并使用经过验证的工具进行评估。研究采用了逻辑回归分析:本研究共招募了 487 名患有 AP-TMD (118 人)和 CP-TMD (369 人)的成人。与 AP-TMD 相比,CP-TMD 患者报告 NP 的几率是 AP-TMD 的两倍(几率比 [OR] = 2.17,95% CI 1.27-3.71),但报告 BP 的几率不是 AP-TMD 的两倍(OR = 0.96,95% CI 0.57-1.64)。与无慢性残疾的参与者相比,有慢性残疾的参与者报告 NP(OR = 1.95,95% CI 1.20-3.17)而无 BP(OR = 1.13,95% CI 0.69-1.82)的可能性是无慢性残疾参与者的两倍。所有分析均根据年龄、性别、焦虑和抑郁症状进行了调整:在本研究的局限性范围内,研究结果表明,中枢调节失调或三叉神经颈汇聚机制与疼痛相关的 TMD 慢性化过程有关,并强调了在定义 CP-TMD 时考虑残疾问题的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Back and neck pain: A comparison between acute and chronic pain-related Temporomandibular Disorders.

Back and neck pain: A comparison between acute and chronic pain-related Temporomandibular Disorders.

Back and neck pain: A comparison between acute and chronic pain-related Temporomandibular Disorders.

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are common and cause persistent pain. Comorbidities are associated with TMDs and can affect the effectiveness of their treatments. The literature is lacking enough evidence on the difference between acute and chronic pain, particularly in TMDs. Investigating this difference could highlight potential risk factors for the transition from acute to chronic pain-related TMDs.

Aim: To compare the likelihood of back and neck pain (BP, NP) between acute and chronic pain-related TMDs (AP-TMD, CP-TMD) as defined by pain duration and pain-related disability.‎.

Methods: Participants with AP-TMDs (≤3 months) and CP-TMDs (>3 months) were recruited according to the diagnostic criteria and research diagnostic criteria of TMD. BP and NP were assessed using a self-reported checklist. CP-TMDs defined by disability (chronic disability) and depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using validated instruments. Logistic regression analyses were employed.

Results: This study enrolled 487 adults with AP-TMD (n = 118) and CP-TMD (n = 369). Relative to AP-TMD, participants with CP-TMD had twice the odds of reporting NP (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17‎, 95% CI 1.27-3.71) but not BP ‎‎(OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.57-1.64). Participants with chronic disability were twice as likely to report NP ‎(OR = 1.95‎, 95% CI 1.20-3.17‎) but not BP (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.69-1.82)‎ compared to those without. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and anxiety and depression symptoms.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, results suggest that central dysregulation or trigeminocervical convergence mechanisms are implicated in the process of pain-related TMD chronification and highlight the relevance of considering disability when defining CP-TMDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信