髋臼骨折后矫治的问题:附38例体会。

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2022-10-13 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.38611
Fabio Zanchini, Antonio Piscopo, Luigi Aurelio Nasto, Davide Piscopo, Alessia Boemio, Stefano Cacciapuoti, Giuseppe Iodice, Valerio Cipolloni, Federico Fusini
{"title":"髋臼骨折后矫治的问题:附38例体会。","authors":"Fabio Zanchini,&nbsp;Antonio Piscopo,&nbsp;Luigi Aurelio Nasto,&nbsp;Davide Piscopo,&nbsp;Alessia Boemio,&nbsp;Stefano Cacciapuoti,&nbsp;Giuseppe Iodice,&nbsp;Valerio Cipolloni,&nbsp;Federico Fusini","doi":"10.52965/001c.38611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within a timeframe of 8 years (2008-2016), 38 patients have undergone total hip replacement surgery for coxarthrosis or aseptic necrosis secondary to acetabulum fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 27 males and 11 females between 42 and 70 years of age, all of whom came from other institutions. The follow-up period ranged between a minimum of 4.6 and a maximum of 9.7 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the final follow-up, all patients were evaluated using the Merle D'Aubigne and Pastel model. Optimal results were found in all the cases. Three patients benefited from surgical revisitation with implant exchange following infection and one/two state reimplatation at seven, fourtheen et twenty-seven months respectively. Two patients benefited from cotyle revision due to chronic instability of the implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scope of the study was to present all the possible surgical difficulties that can come up with prosthetic implants. More particularly, hip implants after acetabulum fractures qualifies as a \"difficult primary implant\".</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"14 6","pages":"38611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568415/pdf/orthopedicreviews_2022_14_6_38611.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WHICH PROBLEMATICS IN THA AFTER ACETABULAR FRACTURES: EXPERIENCE OF 38 CASES.\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Zanchini,&nbsp;Antonio Piscopo,&nbsp;Luigi Aurelio Nasto,&nbsp;Davide Piscopo,&nbsp;Alessia Boemio,&nbsp;Stefano Cacciapuoti,&nbsp;Giuseppe Iodice,&nbsp;Valerio Cipolloni,&nbsp;Federico Fusini\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.38611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within a timeframe of 8 years (2008-2016), 38 patients have undergone total hip replacement surgery for coxarthrosis or aseptic necrosis secondary to acetabulum fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 27 males and 11 females between 42 and 70 years of age, all of whom came from other institutions. The follow-up period ranged between a minimum of 4.6 and a maximum of 9.7 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the final follow-up, all patients were evaluated using the Merle D'Aubigne and Pastel model. Optimal results were found in all the cases. Three patients benefited from surgical revisitation with implant exchange following infection and one/two state reimplatation at seven, fourtheen et twenty-seven months respectively. Two patients benefited from cotyle revision due to chronic instability of the implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scope of the study was to present all the possible surgical difficulties that can come up with prosthetic implants. More particularly, hip implants after acetabulum fractures qualifies as a \\\"difficult primary implant\\\".</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"38611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9568415/pdf/orthopedicreviews_2022_14_6_38611.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.38611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.38611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在8年(2008-2016)的时间框架内,38例患者因髋臼骨折继发的髋关节或无菌性坏死接受了全髋关节置换术。材料与方法:研究对象为男性27人,女性11人,年龄42 ~ 70岁,均来自其他机构。随访时间最少为4.6年,最长为9.7年。结果:在最后随访时,所有患者均采用Merle D'Aubigne和Pastel模型进行评估。在所有情况下均获得了最佳结果。3例患者分别在7个月、14个月和27个月接受了感染后再次手术并进行了种植体置换和一/二状态再种植。由于种植体的慢性不稳定,2例患者受益于子叶修复。结论:本研究的范围是提出所有可能的手术困难,可以提出假体植入。更具体地说,髋臼骨折后的髋关节植入物属于“困难的初级植入物”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WHICH PROBLEMATICS IN THA AFTER ACETABULAR FRACTURES: EXPERIENCE OF 38 CASES.

Background: Within a timeframe of 8 years (2008-2016), 38 patients have undergone total hip replacement surgery for coxarthrosis or aseptic necrosis secondary to acetabulum fractures.

Materials and methods: The study included 27 males and 11 females between 42 and 70 years of age, all of whom came from other institutions. The follow-up period ranged between a minimum of 4.6 and a maximum of 9.7 years.

Results: At the final follow-up, all patients were evaluated using the Merle D'Aubigne and Pastel model. Optimal results were found in all the cases. Three patients benefited from surgical revisitation with implant exchange following infection and one/two state reimplatation at seven, fourtheen et twenty-seven months respectively. Two patients benefited from cotyle revision due to chronic instability of the implant.

Conclusions: The scope of the study was to present all the possible surgical difficulties that can come up with prosthetic implants. More particularly, hip implants after acetabulum fractures qualifies as a "difficult primary implant".

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信