阿根廷COVID-19大流行封锁期间心力衰竭护理的远程医疗。

International Journal of Heart Failure Pub Date : 2020-09-29 eCollection Date: 2020-10-01 DOI:10.36628/ijhf.2020.0025
Lucrecia María Burgos, Mariano Benzadón, Alfonsina Candiello, Miguel Hector Cabral, Diego Conde, Alves Alberto de Lima, Jorge Belardi, Mirta Diez
{"title":"阿根廷COVID-19大流行封锁期间心力衰竭护理的远程医疗。","authors":"Lucrecia María Burgos,&nbsp;Mariano Benzadón,&nbsp;Alfonsina Candiello,&nbsp;Miguel Hector Cabral,&nbsp;Diego Conde,&nbsp;Alves Alberto de Lima,&nbsp;Jorge Belardi,&nbsp;Mirta Diez","doi":"10.36628/ijhf.2020.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, virtual visits (VVs) were recommended as an innovative and necessary alternative for patients with heart failure (HF). To assess the feasibility and acceptability of VVs in patients with HF, pulmonary hypertension (PH), and heart transplant (HT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a single-centre cohort study. Consecutive VVs performed in our HF unit were analysed. The period comprehended between January 1st and March 19th (before COVID-19) and March 20th and June 30th (during COVID-19) was compared. We assessed acceptability, feasibility and the need for diagnostic studies, in-person medical evaluation, and hospitalization at 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HF unit medical doctors conducted 22 VVs in the pre-COVID period and 416 VVs during the COVID period. The VV was able to be performed in all patients scheduled for it and 44% answered the survey. Ninety percent of the patients who answered the survey strongly agreed that VVs were easy to be carried out. All the patients \"strongly agreed\" or \"agreed\" that their health problem could be resolved. Most patients (95%) rated the global experience as very good or excellent, with an overall average rate of 9.76±0.5 out of 10. We found no differences regarding the requirement of diagnostic studies, in-person medical evaluation and hospitalization during the first month after VVs between the 2 periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VVs were feasible, presented high acceptability, and the overall experience was positive in patients with HF, PH, and HT, being this modality a valuable tool that complements in-person care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14058,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"2 4","pages":"247-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/48/ijhf-2-247.PMC9536725.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth in Heart Failure Care during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Argentina.\",\"authors\":\"Lucrecia María Burgos,&nbsp;Mariano Benzadón,&nbsp;Alfonsina Candiello,&nbsp;Miguel Hector Cabral,&nbsp;Diego Conde,&nbsp;Alves Alberto de Lima,&nbsp;Jorge Belardi,&nbsp;Mirta Diez\",\"doi\":\"10.36628/ijhf.2020.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, virtual visits (VVs) were recommended as an innovative and necessary alternative for patients with heart failure (HF). To assess the feasibility and acceptability of VVs in patients with HF, pulmonary hypertension (PH), and heart transplant (HT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a single-centre cohort study. Consecutive VVs performed in our HF unit were analysed. The period comprehended between January 1st and March 19th (before COVID-19) and March 20th and June 30th (during COVID-19) was compared. We assessed acceptability, feasibility and the need for diagnostic studies, in-person medical evaluation, and hospitalization at 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HF unit medical doctors conducted 22 VVs in the pre-COVID period and 416 VVs during the COVID period. The VV was able to be performed in all patients scheduled for it and 44% answered the survey. Ninety percent of the patients who answered the survey strongly agreed that VVs were easy to be carried out. All the patients \\\"strongly agreed\\\" or \\\"agreed\\\" that their health problem could be resolved. Most patients (95%) rated the global experience as very good or excellent, with an overall average rate of 9.76±0.5 out of 10. We found no differences regarding the requirement of diagnostic studies, in-person medical evaluation and hospitalization during the first month after VVs between the 2 periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VVs were feasible, presented high acceptability, and the overall experience was positive in patients with HF, PH, and HT, being this modality a valuable tool that complements in-person care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"247-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b3/48/ijhf-2-247.PMC9536725.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2020.0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2020.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景与目的:在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,虚拟就诊(VVs)被推荐为心力衰竭(HF)患者的一种创新和必要的替代方案。评估心衰、肺动脉高压(PH)和心脏移植(HT)患者使用VVs的可行性和可接受性。方法:我们设计了一项单中心队列研究。我们分析了在我们的HF单元中连续进行的VVs。将1月1日至3月19日(新冠肺炎前)和3月20日至6月30日(新冠肺炎期间)进行比较。我们评估了可接受性、可行性和诊断研究、当面医疗评估和住院30天的必要性。结果:HF单位医生在疫情前进行了22次VVs,在疫情期间进行了416次VVs。VV能够在所有预定的患者中进行,44%的患者回答了调查。在接受调查的患者中,90%的人强烈同意VVs很容易实施。所有患者都“强烈同意”或“同意”他们的健康问题可以得到解决。大多数患者(95%)将整体体验评为非常好或优秀,总体平均评分为9.76±0.5分(满分10分)。我们发现两个时期在VVs后第一个月的诊断研究、当面医疗评估和住院治疗要求方面没有差异。结论:VVs是可行的,具有较高的可接受性,对HF、PH和HT患者的总体体验是积极的,是一种补充现场护理的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Telehealth in Heart Failure Care during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Argentina.

Telehealth in Heart Failure Care during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Argentina.

Telehealth in Heart Failure Care during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Argentina.

Telehealth in Heart Failure Care during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Argentina.

Background and objectives: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, virtual visits (VVs) were recommended as an innovative and necessary alternative for patients with heart failure (HF). To assess the feasibility and acceptability of VVs in patients with HF, pulmonary hypertension (PH), and heart transplant (HT).

Methods: We designed a single-centre cohort study. Consecutive VVs performed in our HF unit were analysed. The period comprehended between January 1st and March 19th (before COVID-19) and March 20th and June 30th (during COVID-19) was compared. We assessed acceptability, feasibility and the need for diagnostic studies, in-person medical evaluation, and hospitalization at 30 days.

Results: HF unit medical doctors conducted 22 VVs in the pre-COVID period and 416 VVs during the COVID period. The VV was able to be performed in all patients scheduled for it and 44% answered the survey. Ninety percent of the patients who answered the survey strongly agreed that VVs were easy to be carried out. All the patients "strongly agreed" or "agreed" that their health problem could be resolved. Most patients (95%) rated the global experience as very good or excellent, with an overall average rate of 9.76±0.5 out of 10. We found no differences regarding the requirement of diagnostic studies, in-person medical evaluation and hospitalization during the first month after VVs between the 2 periods.

Conclusions: VVs were feasible, presented high acceptability, and the overall experience was positive in patients with HF, PH, and HT, being this modality a valuable tool that complements in-person care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信