带针与不带针的McKay手术治疗内翻足的疗效比较。

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2022-06-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Amir Zarei, Morteza Saeb, Aryan Rafiee Zadeh
{"title":"带针与不带针的McKay手术治疗内翻足的疗效比较。","authors":"Amir Zarei,&nbsp;Morteza Saeb,&nbsp;Aryan Rafiee Zadeh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clubfoot is one of the most common foot deformities in children. Surgical treatment is the only choice for patients who have failed conservative treatment. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have been done to compare the McKay surgery with a pin versus without a pin. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of McKay surgery with and without pins in clubfoot patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study is an analytical study. The sample size included patients referred to Imam Reza Hospital from 2016 to 2018. Children who did not respond to plaster therapy were under McKay surgery. In this study, patients were divided into two groups of 50 patients. In the first group, after ligament release and tendon extension, a pin was used to maintain the direction of the talonavicular joint. In the second group, no pin was used. Every six months, radiographs were taken of the patients to monitor their progress. After collecting the study data, they were entered into SPSS software (version 25, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean age of patients was 5.36±2.07 months. Of these, 79 were boys and 21 girls, most of the subjects were aged 4-6 months, and 24% had unilateral one-way clubs. The severity of the disease was 7 feet in grade 2 (moderate) and 93 feet in grade 3 (severe). There was a significant relationship between age, outcome and type of complications with surgical type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Finally, it can be concluded that McKay surgery (both with and without a pin) is exceptionally effective at treating clubfoot.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301156/pdf/ijbt0012-0114.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of the outcome of McKay surgery with and without pin in clubfoot patients.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Zarei,&nbsp;Morteza Saeb,&nbsp;Aryan Rafiee Zadeh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clubfoot is one of the most common foot deformities in children. Surgical treatment is the only choice for patients who have failed conservative treatment. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have been done to compare the McKay surgery with a pin versus without a pin. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of McKay surgery with and without pins in clubfoot patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study is an analytical study. The sample size included patients referred to Imam Reza Hospital from 2016 to 2018. Children who did not respond to plaster therapy were under McKay surgery. In this study, patients were divided into two groups of 50 patients. In the first group, after ligament release and tendon extension, a pin was used to maintain the direction of the talonavicular joint. In the second group, no pin was used. Every six months, radiographs were taken of the patients to monitor their progress. After collecting the study data, they were entered into SPSS software (version 25, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean age of patients was 5.36±2.07 months. Of these, 79 were boys and 21 girls, most of the subjects were aged 4-6 months, and 24% had unilateral one-way clubs. The severity of the disease was 7 feet in grade 2 (moderate) and 93 feet in grade 3 (severe). There was a significant relationship between age, outcome and type of complications with surgical type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Finally, it can be concluded that McKay surgery (both with and without a pin) is exceptionally effective at treating clubfoot.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301156/pdf/ijbt0012-0114.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内翻足是儿童最常见的足部畸形之一。手术治疗是保守治疗失败的患者的唯一选择。据我们所知,没有研究做过比较麦凯手术有针和没有针。我们的研究目的是比较带针和不带针的McKay手术治疗内翻足患者的结果。方法:本研究为分析性研究。样本量包括2016年至2018年在伊玛目礼萨医院转诊的患者。对石膏治疗无反应的患儿行McKay手术。本研究将患者分为两组,每组50例。第一组在韧带松解和肌腱伸展后,用一根针固定距舟关节的方向。在第二组中,没有使用别针。每六个月,对患者进行x光检查以监测其进展。收集研究数据后,将其输入SPSS软件(version 25, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY)进行分析。结果:患者平均年龄5.36±2.07个月。其中男孩79名,女孩21名,大多数受试者年龄为4-6个月,24%患有单侧单向球杆。疾病的严重程度为7英尺2级(中度)和93英尺3级(严重)。年龄、预后、并发症类型与手术类型有显著相关性。结论:最后,可以得出结论,McKay手术(带针和不带针)治疗内翻足特别有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative study of the outcome of McKay surgery with and without pin in clubfoot patients.

Comparative study of the outcome of McKay surgery with and without pin in clubfoot patients.

Comparative study of the outcome of McKay surgery with and without pin in clubfoot patients.

Background: Clubfoot is one of the most common foot deformities in children. Surgical treatment is the only choice for patients who have failed conservative treatment. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have been done to compare the McKay surgery with a pin versus without a pin. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of McKay surgery with and without pins in clubfoot patients.

Method: This study is an analytical study. The sample size included patients referred to Imam Reza Hospital from 2016 to 2018. Children who did not respond to plaster therapy were under McKay surgery. In this study, patients were divided into two groups of 50 patients. In the first group, after ligament release and tendon extension, a pin was used to maintain the direction of the talonavicular joint. In the second group, no pin was used. Every six months, radiographs were taken of the patients to monitor their progress. After collecting the study data, they were entered into SPSS software (version 25, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) and analyzed.

Result: The mean age of patients was 5.36±2.07 months. Of these, 79 were boys and 21 girls, most of the subjects were aged 4-6 months, and 24% had unilateral one-way clubs. The severity of the disease was 7 feet in grade 2 (moderate) and 93 feet in grade 3 (severe). There was a significant relationship between age, outcome and type of complications with surgical type.

Conclusion: Finally, it can be concluded that McKay surgery (both with and without a pin) is exceptionally effective at treating clubfoot.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信