Marta Kołodziej-Rzepa, Beata Biesaga, Dorota Słonina, Anna Mucha-Małecka
{"title":"口咽鳞状细胞癌患者Nanog表达与免疫组织化学评分的关系。","authors":"Marta Kołodziej-Rzepa, Beata Biesaga, Dorota Słonina, Anna Mucha-Małecka","doi":"10.5114/pjp.2021.115662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare prognostic potential of Nanog expression analysed by three immunohistochemical scores in the group of 63 squamous cell carcinomas of oropharynx. Immunoreactivity of Nanog expression was analyzed by semiquantitative score, immunoreactive score and H-score. For all three scores, the cut-off points for Nanog overexpression and its lack, allowing for optimal separation of overall and disease free survival curves, were search by minimal p-value method. In semiquantitative score, the best separation of overall and disease free survival curves was obtain by cut-off point lack of staining vs. week/moderate/strong staining, although statistical significance was not reach (OS: HR = 1.016, p = 0.081, DFS: HR = 6.876, p = 0.061). The cut-off points for immunoreactive score and H-score were, respectively: 1 (OS: HR = 6.977, p = 0.014, DFS: HR = 6.002, p = 0.019) and 50 (OS: HR = 6.977, p = 0.014, DFS: HR = 6.002, p = 0.019). The cut-off points found for these two scores allow to identify the same subgroups of patients with lack of Nanog expression (11.1%) and its overexpression (88.9%). All patients with tumors characterized by lack of Nanog overexpression identifying by immunoreactive score and H-score survived 5 years without evidence of cancer progression. In multivariate analysis Nanog immunoreactivity analysed by QRS and IRS was independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 10.195, p = 0.024). Immunohistochemical score using to distinguish Nanog overexpression or its lack has influence on prognostic potential of this biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":49692,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Pathology","volume":"73 1","pages":"60-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nanog expression in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx in relation to immunohistochemical score.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Kołodziej-Rzepa, Beata Biesaga, Dorota Słonina, Anna Mucha-Małecka\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjp.2021.115662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to compare prognostic potential of Nanog expression analysed by three immunohistochemical scores in the group of 63 squamous cell carcinomas of oropharynx. Immunoreactivity of Nanog expression was analyzed by semiquantitative score, immunoreactive score and H-score. For all three scores, the cut-off points for Nanog overexpression and its lack, allowing for optimal separation of overall and disease free survival curves, were search by minimal p-value method. In semiquantitative score, the best separation of overall and disease free survival curves was obtain by cut-off point lack of staining vs. week/moderate/strong staining, although statistical significance was not reach (OS: HR = 1.016, p = 0.081, DFS: HR = 6.876, p = 0.061). The cut-off points for immunoreactive score and H-score were, respectively: 1 (OS: HR = 6.977, p = 0.014, DFS: HR = 6.002, p = 0.019) and 50 (OS: HR = 6.977, p = 0.014, DFS: HR = 6.002, p = 0.019). The cut-off points found for these two scores allow to identify the same subgroups of patients with lack of Nanog expression (11.1%) and its overexpression (88.9%). All patients with tumors characterized by lack of Nanog overexpression identifying by immunoreactive score and H-score survived 5 years without evidence of cancer progression. In multivariate analysis Nanog immunoreactivity analysed by QRS and IRS was independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 10.195, p = 0.024). Immunohistochemical score using to distinguish Nanog overexpression or its lack has influence on prognostic potential of this biomarker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Pathology\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"60-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2021.115662\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2021.115662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究旨在比较63例口咽鳞状细胞癌中Nanog表达的三种免疫组织化学评分的预后潜力。采用半定量评分法、免疫反应评分法和h评分法分析Nanog表达的免疫反应性。对于所有三个分数,通过最小p值方法搜索Nanog过表达和缺乏的分界点,从而实现总体生存曲线和无病生存曲线的最佳分离。在半定量评分中,虽然没有达到统计学意义(OS: HR = 1.016, p = 0.081, DFS: HR = 6.876, p = 0.061),但总生存曲线和无病生存曲线的最佳分离是未染色与周/中/强染色的截止点。免疫反应评分和h评分的分界点分别为:1 (OS: HR = 6.977, p = 0.014, DFS: HR = 6.002, p = 0.019)和50 (OS: HR = 6.977, p = 0.014, DFS: HR = 6.002, p = 0.019)。这两个评分的分界点可以识别Nanog缺乏表达(11.1%)和过表达(88.9%)的患者亚组。所有通过免疫反应评分和h评分鉴定为Nanog过表达缺失的肿瘤患者存活5年,无癌症进展的证据。多因素分析中,QRS和IRS分析Nanog免疫反应性是OS的独立预后因素(HR = 10.195, p = 0.024)。免疫组织化学评分用于区分Nanog过表达或缺乏对该生物标志物的预后潜力有影响。
Nanog expression in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx in relation to immunohistochemical score.
This study aimed to compare prognostic potential of Nanog expression analysed by three immunohistochemical scores in the group of 63 squamous cell carcinomas of oropharynx. Immunoreactivity of Nanog expression was analyzed by semiquantitative score, immunoreactive score and H-score. For all three scores, the cut-off points for Nanog overexpression and its lack, allowing for optimal separation of overall and disease free survival curves, were search by minimal p-value method. In semiquantitative score, the best separation of overall and disease free survival curves was obtain by cut-off point lack of staining vs. week/moderate/strong staining, although statistical significance was not reach (OS: HR = 1.016, p = 0.081, DFS: HR = 6.876, p = 0.061). The cut-off points for immunoreactive score and H-score were, respectively: 1 (OS: HR = 6.977, p = 0.014, DFS: HR = 6.002, p = 0.019) and 50 (OS: HR = 6.977, p = 0.014, DFS: HR = 6.002, p = 0.019). The cut-off points found for these two scores allow to identify the same subgroups of patients with lack of Nanog expression (11.1%) and its overexpression (88.9%). All patients with tumors characterized by lack of Nanog overexpression identifying by immunoreactive score and H-score survived 5 years without evidence of cancer progression. In multivariate analysis Nanog immunoreactivity analysed by QRS and IRS was independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 10.195, p = 0.024). Immunohistochemical score using to distinguish Nanog overexpression or its lack has influence on prognostic potential of this biomarker.
期刊介绍:
Polish Journal of Pathology is an official magazine of the Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology. For the last 18 years of its presence on the market it has published more than 360 original papers and scientific reports, often quoted in reviewed foreign magazines. A new extended Scientific Board of the quarterly magazine comprises people with recognised achievements in pathomorphology and biology, including molecular biology and cytogenetics, as well as clinical oncology. Polish scientists who are working abroad and are international authorities have also been invited. Apart from presenting scientific reports, the magazine will also play a didactic and training role.