对确诊乳腺癌妇女最初阴性乳房x光筛查的深入回顾性分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-11-11 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5334/jbsr.2796
Lieve Vandendaele, Svetlana Jidkova, Koen Van Herck, Tom Kimpe, Veerle Verschuere
{"title":"对确诊乳腺癌妇女最初阴性乳房x光筛查的深入回顾性分析。","authors":"Lieve Vandendaele,&nbsp;Svetlana Jidkova,&nbsp;Koen Van Herck,&nbsp;Tom Kimpe,&nbsp;Veerle Verschuere","doi":"10.5334/jbsr.2796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to contribute to the assessment of the screening performance in Flanders (Belgium) and to identify valuable mammograms for subsequent studies and training.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Initially negative prior screening mammograms (sMx) of 210 women with confirmed breast cancer detected by the Flemish screening programme between 2011-2013 were reviewed by a highly experienced radiologist. The review of the prior sMx was performed in three steps: 1) only prior mammograms available; 2) with index sMx (=subsequent positive sMx) present; 3) with index sMx and clinical information present.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiological review yielded 94 (45%) mammograms 'without suspicious lesions', 77 (37%) 'with minimal signs in at least one breast', and 39 (19%) 'with clearly visible tumours'. In univariate analyses, the reclassification of prior sMx was significantly associated with the date of the prior sMx, the need for a third reader for arbitration, image quality and the detector system used (computed radiography versus direct readout digital radiography), and it was not associated with the interval between screening rounds, age at prior sMx, breast density, or tumour characteristics (<T2 versus ≥T2, in situ versus invasive). In multivariate analyses, the date of the prior sMx (p = 0.001), need for arbitration (p = 0.001) and image quality (p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with the reclassification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective review reclassified 19% of the sMx as clearly visible tumours. With this, the Flemish screening programme performs in accordance with similar studies. The sMx reviewed in this study, form a valuable set of mammograms for training and further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":56282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-depth Retrospective Review of Originally Negative Screening Mammograms from Women with Confirmed Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Lieve Vandendaele,&nbsp;Svetlana Jidkova,&nbsp;Koen Van Herck,&nbsp;Tom Kimpe,&nbsp;Veerle Verschuere\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/jbsr.2796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to contribute to the assessment of the screening performance in Flanders (Belgium) and to identify valuable mammograms for subsequent studies and training.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Initially negative prior screening mammograms (sMx) of 210 women with confirmed breast cancer detected by the Flemish screening programme between 2011-2013 were reviewed by a highly experienced radiologist. The review of the prior sMx was performed in three steps: 1) only prior mammograms available; 2) with index sMx (=subsequent positive sMx) present; 3) with index sMx and clinical information present.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiological review yielded 94 (45%) mammograms 'without suspicious lesions', 77 (37%) 'with minimal signs in at least one breast', and 39 (19%) 'with clearly visible tumours'. In univariate analyses, the reclassification of prior sMx was significantly associated with the date of the prior sMx, the need for a third reader for arbitration, image quality and the detector system used (computed radiography versus direct readout digital radiography), and it was not associated with the interval between screening rounds, age at prior sMx, breast density, or tumour characteristics (<T2 versus ≥T2, in situ versus invasive). In multivariate analyses, the date of the prior sMx (p = 0.001), need for arbitration (p = 0.001) and image quality (p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with the reclassification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective review reclassified 19% of the sMx as clearly visible tumours. With this, the Flemish screening programme performs in accordance with similar studies. The sMx reviewed in this study, form a valuable set of mammograms for training and further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2796\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2796","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目标是为评估法兰德斯(比利时)的筛查表现做出贡献,并为随后的研究和培训确定有价值的乳房x光检查。材料和方法:由一位经验丰富的放射科医生对2011-2013年弗拉芒筛查项目检测到的210名确诊乳腺癌妇女的初始阴性预先筛查乳房x线照片(sMx)进行了审查。先前的sMx检查分三步进行:1)仅提供先前的乳房x光检查;2)指数sMx(=后续正sMx)存在;3)有sMx指数和临床资料。结果:94例(45%)乳腺x线检查无可疑病变,77例(37%)无可疑病变。“至少有一个乳房有轻微症状”,39 (19%)“有清晰可见的肿瘤”。在单变量分析中,先前sMx的重新分类与先前sMx的日期、需要第三个阅读器进行判定、图像质量和使用的检测器系统(计算机x线摄影与直接读数数字x线摄影)显著相关,而与筛查轮间隔、先前sMx的年龄、乳腺密度或肿瘤特征无关(结论:本回顾性研究将19%的sMx重新分类为清晰可见的肿瘤。有了这些,佛兰德筛查方案按照类似的研究进行。本研究回顾的sMx为培训和进一步研究提供了一套有价值的乳房x线照片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-depth Retrospective Review of Originally Negative Screening Mammograms from Women with Confirmed Breast Cancer.

Objectives: We aim to contribute to the assessment of the screening performance in Flanders (Belgium) and to identify valuable mammograms for subsequent studies and training.

Materials and methods: Initially negative prior screening mammograms (sMx) of 210 women with confirmed breast cancer detected by the Flemish screening programme between 2011-2013 were reviewed by a highly experienced radiologist. The review of the prior sMx was performed in three steps: 1) only prior mammograms available; 2) with index sMx (=subsequent positive sMx) present; 3) with index sMx and clinical information present.

Results: The radiological review yielded 94 (45%) mammograms 'without suspicious lesions', 77 (37%) 'with minimal signs in at least one breast', and 39 (19%) 'with clearly visible tumours'. In univariate analyses, the reclassification of prior sMx was significantly associated with the date of the prior sMx, the need for a third reader for arbitration, image quality and the detector system used (computed radiography versus direct readout digital radiography), and it was not associated with the interval between screening rounds, age at prior sMx, breast density, or tumour characteristics (

Conclusion: This retrospective review reclassified 19% of the sMx as clearly visible tumours. With this, the Flemish screening programme performs in accordance with similar studies. The sMx reviewed in this study, form a valuable set of mammograms for training and further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology is the publication of articles dealing with diagnostic and interventional radiology, related imaging techniques, allied sciences, and continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信