原基牙与兼容非原基牙种植体-基牙界面边缘与内部配合评价。

Q3 Dentistry
Antoine Berberi, Georges Tehini, Bouchra Hjeij, Georges Aoun
{"title":"原基牙与兼容非原基牙种植体-基牙界面边缘与内部配合评价。","authors":"Antoine Berberi,&nbsp;Georges Tehini,&nbsp;Bouchra Hjeij,&nbsp;Georges Aoun","doi":"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022040297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Is to measure the peripheral and internal gap at the implant-abutment interface of an implant system connected to its original or compatible non-original abutments. Twenty implants were assembled with four different types of abutments having the same conical internal interface. All abutments were considered compatible with Tx Astra Tech Implant SystemTM. Four groups were created and each group of five implants was connected to a different abutment; Ti DesignTM abutments (group A), DualTM abutments (group B), Natea plusTM abutments (group C) and ImplanetTM abutments (group D). The peripheral gaps between implant and abutment were observed in three points facing the flat surface of the abutment. The implant-abutment assemblies were then embedded in resin and grinded in the mesio-distal direction of the scalloped abutment margin using a diamond disk at very low speed and under water-cooling. The inner aspect of the implant abutment interface was observed in three different points, on the coronal border of the connection, in the middle area and on the apical border of the implant-abutment interface. The mean gap width was 0.543 ± 0.09 μm for group A and, respectively, 0.708 ± 0.1232 μm, 0.726 ± 0.0891 μm and 0.818 ± 0.0851 μm for groups B, C and D. When comparing group, A to B and C, a highly significant difference in numbers was obvious while an even higher variation was observed with group D. External and internal fit of components is better when using original components.</p>","PeriodicalId":16125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","volume":"32 3","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit at Implant-Abutment Interface of Original and Compatible Nonoriginal Abutments.\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Berberi,&nbsp;Georges Tehini,&nbsp;Bouchra Hjeij,&nbsp;Georges Aoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022040297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Is to measure the peripheral and internal gap at the implant-abutment interface of an implant system connected to its original or compatible non-original abutments. Twenty implants were assembled with four different types of abutments having the same conical internal interface. All abutments were considered compatible with Tx Astra Tech Implant SystemTM. Four groups were created and each group of five implants was connected to a different abutment; Ti DesignTM abutments (group A), DualTM abutments (group B), Natea plusTM abutments (group C) and ImplanetTM abutments (group D). The peripheral gaps between implant and abutment were observed in three points facing the flat surface of the abutment. The implant-abutment assemblies were then embedded in resin and grinded in the mesio-distal direction of the scalloped abutment margin using a diamond disk at very low speed and under water-cooling. The inner aspect of the implant abutment interface was observed in three different points, on the coronal border of the connection, in the middle area and on the apical border of the implant-abutment interface. The mean gap width was 0.543 ± 0.09 μm for group A and, respectively, 0.708 ± 0.1232 μm, 0.726 ± 0.0891 μm and 0.818 ± 0.0851 μm for groups B, C and D. When comparing group, A to B and C, a highly significant difference in numbers was obvious while an even higher variation was observed with group D. External and internal fit of components is better when using original components.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"21-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022040297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022040297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

是测量种植体系统与原有或兼容的非原有基台连接的种植体-基台界面处的周边和内部间隙。将20个种植体与四种不同类型的基台组装在一起,这些基台具有相同的锥形内部界面。所有基台均被认为与Tx Astra Tech Implant SystemTM兼容。制作四组,每组五个种植体连接到不同的基台;采用Ti DesignTM基牙(A组)、DualTM基牙(B组)、Natea plusTM基牙(C组)和ImplanetTM基牙(D组)。种植体与基牙之间的间隙分布在三个面向基牙平面的点上。然后将种植体-基台组件包埋在树脂中,并使用金刚石盘在极低速和水冷却下沿扇形基台边缘的中-远端方向进行研磨。在种植体-基牙界面的冠状边界、中间区域和根尖边界三个不同的点上观察种植体-基牙界面的内部。A组的平均间隙宽度为0.543±0.09 μm, B、C、d组的平均间隙宽度为0.708±0.1232 μm, 0.726±0.0891 μm, 0.818±0.0851 μm。A组与B、C组的差异极显著,d组的差异更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit at Implant-Abutment Interface of Original and Compatible Nonoriginal Abutments.

Is to measure the peripheral and internal gap at the implant-abutment interface of an implant system connected to its original or compatible non-original abutments. Twenty implants were assembled with four different types of abutments having the same conical internal interface. All abutments were considered compatible with Tx Astra Tech Implant SystemTM. Four groups were created and each group of five implants was connected to a different abutment; Ti DesignTM abutments (group A), DualTM abutments (group B), Natea plusTM abutments (group C) and ImplanetTM abutments (group D). The peripheral gaps between implant and abutment were observed in three points facing the flat surface of the abutment. The implant-abutment assemblies were then embedded in resin and grinded in the mesio-distal direction of the scalloped abutment margin using a diamond disk at very low speed and under water-cooling. The inner aspect of the implant abutment interface was observed in three different points, on the coronal border of the connection, in the middle area and on the apical border of the implant-abutment interface. The mean gap width was 0.543 ± 0.09 μm for group A and, respectively, 0.708 ± 0.1232 μm, 0.726 ± 0.0891 μm and 0.818 ± 0.0851 μm for groups B, C and D. When comparing group, A to B and C, a highly significant difference in numbers was obvious while an even higher variation was observed with group D. External and internal fit of components is better when using original components.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: MEDICAL IMPLANTS are being used in every organ of the human body. Ideally, medical implants must have biomechanical properties comparable to those of autogenous tissues without any adverse effects. In each anatomic site, studies of the long-term effects of medical implants must be undertaken to determine accurately the safety and performance of the implants. Today, implant surgery has become an interdisciplinary undertaking involving a number of skilled and gifted specialists. For example, successful cochlear implants will involve audiologists, audiological physicians, speech and language therapists, otolaryngologists, nurses, neuro-otologists, teachers of the deaf, hearing therapists, cochlear implant manufacturers, and others involved with hearing-impaired and deaf individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信