血清胆汁酸作为肝硬化代谢物生物标志物的预测价值:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Xu Han, Juan Wang, Hao Gu, Hongtao Guo, Yili Cai, Xing Liao, Miao Jiang
{"title":"血清胆汁酸作为肝硬化代谢物生物标志物的预测价值:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xu Han, Juan Wang, Hao Gu, Hongtao Guo, Yili Cai, Xing Liao, Miao Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s11306-022-01890-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A large number of studies have explored the potential biomarkers for detecting liver cirrhosis in an early stage, yet consistent conclusions are still warranted.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a review and a meta-analysis of the existing studies that test the serum level of bile acids in cirrhosis as the potential biomarkers to predict cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases had been searched from inception date to April 12, 2021. Screening and selection of the records were based on the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). Mean difference (MD) and confidence intervals 95% (95% CI) were calculated by using the random effect model for the concentrations of bile acids in the meta-analysis, and I<sup>2</sup> statistic was used to measure studies heterogeneity. This study was registered on PROSPERO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1583 records were identified and 31 studies with 2679 participants (1263 in the cirrhosis group, 1416 in the healthy control group) were included. The quality of included studies was generally high, with 25 studies (80.6%) rated over 7 stars. A total of 45 bile acids or their ratios in included studies were extracted. 36 increased in the cirrhosis group compared with those of the healthy controls by a qualitative summary, 5 decreased and 4 presented with mixing results. The result of meta-analysis among 12 studies showed that 13 bile acids increased, among which four primary conjugated bile acids showed the most significant elevation in the cirrhosis group: GCDCA (MD = 11.38 μmol/L, 95% CI 8.21-14.55, P < 0.0001), GCA (MD = 5.72 μmol/L, 95% CI 3.47-7.97, P < 0.0001), TCDCA (MD = 3.57 μmol/L, 95% CI 2.64-4.49, P < 0.0001) and TCA (MD = 2.14 μmol/L, 95% CI 1.56-2.72, P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of DCA (MD = - 0.1 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.18 to - 0.01, P < 0.0001) and LCA (MD = - 0.01 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.01 to - 0.02, P < 0.0001), UDCA (MD = - 0.14 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.04 to - 0.32, P < 0.0001), and TLCA (MD = 0 μmol/L, 95% CI 0-0.01, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Altered serum bile acids profile seems to be associated with cirrhosis. Some specific bile acids (GCA, GCDCA, TCA, and TCDCA) may increase with the development of cirrhosis, which possibly underlay their potential role as predictive biomarkers for cirrhosis. Yet this predictive value still needs further investigation and validation in larger prospective cohort studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":144887,"journal":{"name":"Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society","volume":" ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of serum bile acids as metabolite biomarkers for liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xu Han, Juan Wang, Hao Gu, Hongtao Guo, Yili Cai, Xing Liao, Miao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11306-022-01890-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A large number of studies have explored the potential biomarkers for detecting liver cirrhosis in an early stage, yet consistent conclusions are still warranted.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a review and a meta-analysis of the existing studies that test the serum level of bile acids in cirrhosis as the potential biomarkers to predict cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases had been searched from inception date to April 12, 2021. Screening and selection of the records were based on the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). Mean difference (MD) and confidence intervals 95% (95% CI) were calculated by using the random effect model for the concentrations of bile acids in the meta-analysis, and I<sup>2</sup> statistic was used to measure studies heterogeneity. This study was registered on PROSPERO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1583 records were identified and 31 studies with 2679 participants (1263 in the cirrhosis group, 1416 in the healthy control group) were included. The quality of included studies was generally high, with 25 studies (80.6%) rated over 7 stars. A total of 45 bile acids or their ratios in included studies were extracted. 36 increased in the cirrhosis group compared with those of the healthy controls by a qualitative summary, 5 decreased and 4 presented with mixing results. The result of meta-analysis among 12 studies showed that 13 bile acids increased, among which four primary conjugated bile acids showed the most significant elevation in the cirrhosis group: GCDCA (MD = 11.38 μmol/L, 95% CI 8.21-14.55, P < 0.0001), GCA (MD = 5.72 μmol/L, 95% CI 3.47-7.97, P < 0.0001), TCDCA (MD = 3.57 μmol/L, 95% CI 2.64-4.49, P < 0.0001) and TCA (MD = 2.14 μmol/L, 95% CI 1.56-2.72, P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of DCA (MD = - 0.1 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.18 to - 0.01, P < 0.0001) and LCA (MD = - 0.01 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.01 to - 0.02, P < 0.0001), UDCA (MD = - 0.14 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.04 to - 0.32, P < 0.0001), and TLCA (MD = 0 μmol/L, 95% CI 0-0.01, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Altered serum bile acids profile seems to be associated with cirrhosis. Some specific bile acids (GCA, GCDCA, TCA, and TCDCA) may increase with the development of cirrhosis, which possibly underlay their potential role as predictive biomarkers for cirrhosis. Yet this predictive value still needs further investigation and validation in larger prospective cohort studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":144887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-022-01890-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-022-01890-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量的研究已经探索了早期检测肝硬化的潜在生物标志物,但仍有一致的结论。目的:对肝硬化患者血清胆汁酸水平作为预测肝硬化的潜在生物标志物的现有研究进行综述和荟萃分析。方法:检索自成立日至2021年4月12日的6个数据库。根据纳入标准筛选和选择记录。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表(NOS)进行评估。meta分析中胆汁酸浓度采用随机效应模型计算平均差值(MD)和置信区间95% (95% CI),采用I2统计量衡量研究异质性。这项研究已在普洛斯彼罗注册。结果:共确定了1583条记录,包括31项研究,2679名参与者(肝硬化组1263名,健康对照组1416名)。纳入的研究质量总体较高,有25篇(80.6%)的评价在7星以上。在纳入的研究中,共提取了45种胆汁酸或它们的比例。与健康对照组相比,肝硬化组有36例增加,5例减少,4例出现混合结果。12项研究的meta分析结果显示,13种胆汁酸升高,其中4种原发性结合胆汁酸在肝硬化组升高最为显著:GCDCA (MD = 11.38 μmol/L, 95% CI 8.21 ~ 14.55, P)。结论:血清胆汁酸谱的改变可能与肝硬化有关。一些特定的胆汁酸(GCA、GCDCA、TCA和TCDCA)可能随着肝硬化的发展而增加,这可能是它们作为肝硬化预测生物标志物的潜在作用。然而,这一预测价值仍需要在更大规模的前瞻性队列研究中进一步调查和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive value of serum bile acids as metabolite biomarkers for liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: A large number of studies have explored the potential biomarkers for detecting liver cirrhosis in an early stage, yet consistent conclusions are still warranted.

Objectives: To conduct a review and a meta-analysis of the existing studies that test the serum level of bile acids in cirrhosis as the potential biomarkers to predict cirrhosis.

Methods: Six databases had been searched from inception date to April 12, 2021. Screening and selection of the records were based on the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). Mean difference (MD) and confidence intervals 95% (95% CI) were calculated by using the random effect model for the concentrations of bile acids in the meta-analysis, and I2 statistic was used to measure studies heterogeneity. This study was registered on PROSPERO.

Results: A total of 1583 records were identified and 31 studies with 2679 participants (1263 in the cirrhosis group, 1416 in the healthy control group) were included. The quality of included studies was generally high, with 25 studies (80.6%) rated over 7 stars. A total of 45 bile acids or their ratios in included studies were extracted. 36 increased in the cirrhosis group compared with those of the healthy controls by a qualitative summary, 5 decreased and 4 presented with mixing results. The result of meta-analysis among 12 studies showed that 13 bile acids increased, among which four primary conjugated bile acids showed the most significant elevation in the cirrhosis group: GCDCA (MD = 11.38 μmol/L, 95% CI 8.21-14.55, P < 0.0001), GCA (MD = 5.72 μmol/L, 95% CI 3.47-7.97, P < 0.0001), TCDCA (MD = 3.57 μmol/L, 95% CI 2.64-4.49, P < 0.0001) and TCA (MD = 2.14 μmol/L, 95% CI 1.56-2.72, P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of DCA (MD = - 0.1 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.18 to - 0.01, P < 0.0001) and LCA (MD = - 0.01 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.01 to - 0.02, P < 0.0001), UDCA (MD = - 0.14 μmol/L, 95% CI - 0.04 to - 0.32, P < 0.0001), and TLCA (MD = 0 μmol/L, 95% CI 0-0.01, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis showed similar results.

Conclusion: Altered serum bile acids profile seems to be associated with cirrhosis. Some specific bile acids (GCA, GCDCA, TCA, and TCDCA) may increase with the development of cirrhosis, which possibly underlay their potential role as predictive biomarkers for cirrhosis. Yet this predictive value still needs further investigation and validation in larger prospective cohort studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信