用小型加速度计测量腰椎运动角:可靠性研究

Ryo Miyachi PhD , Ayaka Sano BS(Physio) , Nana Tanaka BS(Physio) , Misaki Tamai BS(Physio) , Junya Miyazaki PhD
{"title":"用小型加速度计测量腰椎运动角:可靠性研究","authors":"Ryo Miyachi PhD ,&nbsp;Ayaka Sano BS(Physio) ,&nbsp;Nana Tanaka BS(Physio) ,&nbsp;Misaki Tamai BS(Physio) ,&nbsp;Junya Miyazaki PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the lumbar motion angle using a small accelerometer for movement tests in the sagittal plane, and to determine the number of measurements required to obtain reliable data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 102 healthy adults (56% women, 44% men; 20.1 ± 1.1 years of age) participated in this study. The intra- and interexaminer reliability<span> of lumbar motion angle measurements during forward and backward trunk bending and prone hip extension were investigated. Lumbar motion angles were measured with small accelerometers placed at the thoracolumbar transition, lumbosacral transition, and thigh, during motion and at the final position. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.6 to 0.8 in intraexaminer analyses and from 0.5 to 0.7 in interexaminer analyses. Intraexaminer systematic biases were found only in the maximum angle of trunk forward bending. Interexaminer biases were found in all angles of trunk forward bending.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the measurement of lumbar motion angle in the sagittal plane using a small accelerometer, it was necessary to repeat measurements 2 to 4 times, because a single measurement was not sufficiently reliable either within or between examiners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Lumbar Motion Angle With a Small Accelerometer: A Reliability Study\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Miyachi PhD ,&nbsp;Ayaka Sano BS(Physio) ,&nbsp;Nana Tanaka BS(Physio) ,&nbsp;Misaki Tamai BS(Physio) ,&nbsp;Junya Miyazaki PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the lumbar motion angle using a small accelerometer for movement tests in the sagittal plane, and to determine the number of measurements required to obtain reliable data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 102 healthy adults (56% women, 44% men; 20.1 ± 1.1 years of age) participated in this study. The intra- and interexaminer reliability<span> of lumbar motion angle measurements during forward and backward trunk bending and prone hip extension were investigated. Lumbar motion angles were measured with small accelerometers placed at the thoracolumbar transition, lumbosacral transition, and thigh, during motion and at the final position. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.6 to 0.8 in intraexaminer analyses and from 0.5 to 0.7 in interexaminer analyses. Intraexaminer systematic biases were found only in the maximum angle of trunk forward bending. Interexaminer biases were found in all angles of trunk forward bending.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the measurement of lumbar motion angle in the sagittal plane using a small accelerometer, it was necessary to repeat measurements 2 to 4 times, because a single measurement was not sufficiently reliable either within or between examiners.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本研究的目的是探讨在矢状面运动测试中使用小型加速度计测量腰椎运动角的可靠性,并确定获得可靠数据所需的测量次数。方法102例健康成人(女性56%,男性44%;(20.1±1.1岁)参加本研究。研究了前后躯干弯曲和俯卧髋关节伸展时腰椎运动角测量在检查人内部和检查人之间的可靠性。在运动过程中和最终体位时,用放置在胸腰段过渡段、腰骶段过渡段和大腿的小型加速度计测量腰椎运动角。采用类内相关系数和Bland-Altman分析进行统计分析。结果组内相关系数为0.6 ~ 0.8,组间相关系数为0.5 ~ 0.7。仅在躯干前屈的最大角度处发现了内测者系统偏差。在躯干前屈的各个角度都发现了鉴定人的偏差。结论使用小型加速度计测量腰椎矢状面运动角时,有必要重复测量2 ~ 4次,因为一次测量在检查者内部或检查者之间都不够可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Lumbar Motion Angle With a Small Accelerometer: A Reliability Study

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the lumbar motion angle using a small accelerometer for movement tests in the sagittal plane, and to determine the number of measurements required to obtain reliable data.

Methods

In total, 102 healthy adults (56% women, 44% men; 20.1 ± 1.1 years of age) participated in this study. The intra- and interexaminer reliability of lumbar motion angle measurements during forward and backward trunk bending and prone hip extension were investigated. Lumbar motion angles were measured with small accelerometers placed at the thoracolumbar transition, lumbosacral transition, and thigh, during motion and at the final position. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used for statistical analysis.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.6 to 0.8 in intraexaminer analyses and from 0.5 to 0.7 in interexaminer analyses. Intraexaminer systematic biases were found only in the maximum angle of trunk forward bending. Interexaminer biases were found in all angles of trunk forward bending.

Conclusion

In the measurement of lumbar motion angle in the sagittal plane using a small accelerometer, it was necessary to repeat measurements 2 to 4 times, because a single measurement was not sufficiently reliable either within or between examiners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信