腹部压迫绷带对肥胖成人结肠镜检查完成的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2022-09-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/6010367
Ting-Ting Liu, Yi-Teng Meng, Feng Xiong, Cheng Wei, Su Luo, Sheng-Gang Zhan, Yang Song, Ying-Xue Li, Rui-Yue Shi, Jun Yao, Li-Sheng Wang, De-Feng Li
{"title":"腹部压迫绷带对肥胖成人结肠镜检查完成的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Ting-Ting Liu,&nbsp;Yi-Teng Meng,&nbsp;Feng Xiong,&nbsp;Cheng Wei,&nbsp;Su Luo,&nbsp;Sheng-Gang Zhan,&nbsp;Yang Song,&nbsp;Ying-Xue Li,&nbsp;Rui-Yue Shi,&nbsp;Jun Yao,&nbsp;Li-Sheng Wang,&nbsp;De-Feng Li","doi":"10.1155/2022/6010367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients were randomly allocated into the abdominal bandage and conventional groups during a routine colonoscopy. The primary outcome was CCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the abdominal bandage and conventional groups from January 2021 to April 2021. Eleven patients (five in the abdominal bandage group and six in the conventional group) were excluded due to schedule cancellation after randomization, and 239 patients were eventually included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding baseline characteristics (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in terms of advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), bowel preparation scale (BBPS), bubble scale (BS), and withdrawal time between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, compared with the conventional group, the cecal insertion time (CIT) of the abdominal bandage group was significantly shortened (279.00 (234.50-305.75) vs. 421.00 (327.00-485.00), <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the CCR (96.7% vs. 88.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) (47.5% vs. 32.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were improved. Besides, logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) and abdominal compression bandage were associated with CCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abdominal compression bandages could effectively shorten CIT and improve CCR and ADR for obese patients during a routine colonoscopy. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100043556).</p>","PeriodicalId":48755,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"6010367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470372/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of an Abdominal Compression Bandage on the Completion of Colonoscopy for Obese Adults: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Ting Liu,&nbsp;Yi-Teng Meng,&nbsp;Feng Xiong,&nbsp;Cheng Wei,&nbsp;Su Luo,&nbsp;Sheng-Gang Zhan,&nbsp;Yang Song,&nbsp;Ying-Xue Li,&nbsp;Rui-Yue Shi,&nbsp;Jun Yao,&nbsp;Li-Sheng Wang,&nbsp;De-Feng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/6010367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients were randomly allocated into the abdominal bandage and conventional groups during a routine colonoscopy. The primary outcome was CCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the abdominal bandage and conventional groups from January 2021 to April 2021. Eleven patients (five in the abdominal bandage group and six in the conventional group) were excluded due to schedule cancellation after randomization, and 239 patients were eventually included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding baseline characteristics (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in terms of advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), bowel preparation scale (BBPS), bubble scale (BS), and withdrawal time between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, compared with the conventional group, the cecal insertion time (CIT) of the abdominal bandage group was significantly shortened (279.00 (234.50-305.75) vs. 421.00 (327.00-485.00), <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the CCR (96.7% vs. 88.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) (47.5% vs. 32.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were improved. Besides, logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) and abdominal compression bandage were associated with CCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abdominal compression bandages could effectively shorten CIT and improve CCR and ADR for obese patients during a routine colonoscopy. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100043556).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6010367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6010367\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6010367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

方法:在常规结肠镜检查时,将符合条件的患者随机分为腹部绷带组和常规组。主要终点为CCR。结果:从2021年1月至2021年4月,共有250名符合条件的患者被随机分配到腹部绷带组和常规组。11例患者(腹部绷带组5例,常规组6例)在随机化后因计划取消而被排除,最终239例患者被纳入最终分析。两组患者基线特征比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组患者在晚期腺瘤检出率(AADR)、息肉检出率(PDR)、肠准备量表(BBPS)、气泡量表(BS)、停药时间等方面差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。但与常规组相比,腹部绷带组的盲肠插入时间(CIT)明显缩短(279.00(234.50-305.75)比421.00 (327.00-485.00),P P = 0.01),腺瘤检出率(ADR)显著缩短(47.5%比32.8%),P结论:腹部压迫绷带可有效缩短CIT,改善肥胖患者常规结肠镜检查时CCR和ADR。本试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册。ChiCTR2100043556)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of an Abdominal Compression Bandage on the Completion of Colonoscopy for Obese Adults: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Impact of an Abdominal Compression Bandage on the Completion of Colonoscopy for Obese Adults: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Impact of an Abdominal Compression Bandage on the Completion of Colonoscopy for Obese Adults: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Impact of an Abdominal Compression Bandage on the Completion of Colonoscopy for Obese Adults: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Methods: Eligible patients were randomly allocated into the abdominal bandage and conventional groups during a routine colonoscopy. The primary outcome was CCR.

Results: A total of 250 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the abdominal bandage and conventional groups from January 2021 to April 2021. Eleven patients (five in the abdominal bandage group and six in the conventional group) were excluded due to schedule cancellation after randomization, and 239 patients were eventually included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in terms of advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), bowel preparation scale (BBPS), bubble scale (BS), and withdrawal time between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, compared with the conventional group, the cecal insertion time (CIT) of the abdominal bandage group was significantly shortened (279.00 (234.50-305.75) vs. 421.00 (327.00-485.00), P < 0.001), and the CCR (96.7% vs. 88.2%, P = 0.01) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) (47.5% vs. 32.8%, P < 0.001) were improved. Besides, logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) and abdominal compression bandage were associated with CCR.

Conclusions: Abdominal compression bandages could effectively shorten CIT and improve CCR and ADR for obese patients during a routine colonoscopy. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100043556).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信