使用定性方法评估系统相互依存性的经验教训。

Q2 Social Sciences
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-14 DOI:10.1177/1035719x211066961
Eric Souvannasacd, Heather Engblom, Richard N Van Eck, Ralph Renger, Marc Basson
{"title":"使用定性方法评估系统相互依存性的经验教训。","authors":"Eric Souvannasacd, Heather Engblom, Richard N Van Eck, Ralph Renger, Marc Basson","doi":"10.1177/1035719x211066961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article shares lessons learned while evaluating the system interdependencies for a clinical and translational research centre (CTR). It explores the methodological challenge of discussing system concepts (e.g., cascading failures, feedback loops, and reflex arcs) with layperson participants during evaluation interviews. The article discusses the iterative process of moving from structured interview approaches in favor of an open narrative approach for data collection and lessons learned.</p>","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"22 2","pages":"108-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9431899/pdf/nihms-1781971.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons learned in evaluating system interdependencies using qualitative methods.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Souvannasacd, Heather Engblom, Richard N Van Eck, Ralph Renger, Marc Basson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1035719x211066961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article shares lessons learned while evaluating the system interdependencies for a clinical and translational research centre (CTR). It explores the methodological challenge of discussing system concepts (e.g., cascading failures, feedback loops, and reflex arcs) with layperson participants during evaluation interviews. The article discusses the iterative process of moving from structured interview approaches in favor of an open narrative approach for data collection and lessons learned.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"108-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9431899/pdf/nihms-1781971.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x211066961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x211066961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分享了在评估一个临床和转化研究中心(CTR)的系统相互依存关系时获得的经验教训。文章探讨了在评估访谈中与外行参与者讨论系统概念(如级联故障、反馈回路和反射弧)所面临的方法论挑战。文章讨论了从结构化访谈方法转向开放式叙事方法以收集数据和吸取经验教训的迭代过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lessons learned in evaluating system interdependencies using qualitative methods.

Lessons learned in evaluating system interdependencies using qualitative methods.

Lessons learned in evaluating system interdependencies using qualitative methods.

This article shares lessons learned while evaluating the system interdependencies for a clinical and translational research centre (CTR). It explores the methodological challenge of discussing system concepts (e.g., cascading failures, feedback loops, and reflex arcs) with layperson participants during evaluation interviews. The article discusses the iterative process of moving from structured interview approaches in favor of an open narrative approach for data collection and lessons learned.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信