{"title":"不孕症年轻女性自然IVF周期和IUI周期新鲜胚胎移植妊娠结局的比较。","authors":"Yoko Gekka, Koji Nakagawa, Hideaki Watanabe, Keiji Kuroda, Takashi Horikawa, Satoru Takamizawa, Rikikazu Sugiyama","doi":"10.18502/jri.v23i2.8993.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the current study was comparing pregnancy outcomes for natural cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) per fresh embryo transfer (ET) and oocyte pick-up (OPU) in intrauterine insemination (IUI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent either IUI (n=246) or OPU with fresh ET for natural cycle IVF (n=291), conducted between April 2017 and February 2018 at the Center for Reproductive Medicine and Implantation Research, Sugiyama Clinic Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan. Patients in both groups did not receive ovarian stimulation and luteal support; gonadotropin-releasing agonist spray was administered 35 <i>hr</i> before OPU or IUI. The clinical pregnancy rate was compared between the IUI and IVF groups. Data analysis was based on the number of cycles. The p≦0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical pregnancy rate per OPU in the IVF group was higher than the one in IUI group (20.6% <i>vs</i>. 10.1%), and the difference was significant (p<0.01). The pregnancy rate for natural cycle IVF calculated per fresh ET was 36.8%. The miscarriage rate did not significantly differ between the IVF (4.1%) and IUI (8.0%) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fresh ET in natural cycle IVF provides a higher implantation rate than IUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":38826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","volume":"23 2","pages":"93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ef/f2/JRI-23-93.PMC9363904.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Fresh Embryo Transfer in a Natural IVF Cycle and IUI Cycle Among Infertile Young Women.\",\"authors\":\"Yoko Gekka, Koji Nakagawa, Hideaki Watanabe, Keiji Kuroda, Takashi Horikawa, Satoru Takamizawa, Rikikazu Sugiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jri.v23i2.8993.\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the current study was comparing pregnancy outcomes for natural cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) per fresh embryo transfer (ET) and oocyte pick-up (OPU) in intrauterine insemination (IUI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent either IUI (n=246) or OPU with fresh ET for natural cycle IVF (n=291), conducted between April 2017 and February 2018 at the Center for Reproductive Medicine and Implantation Research, Sugiyama Clinic Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan. Patients in both groups did not receive ovarian stimulation and luteal support; gonadotropin-releasing agonist spray was administered 35 <i>hr</i> before OPU or IUI. The clinical pregnancy rate was compared between the IUI and IVF groups. Data analysis was based on the number of cycles. The p≦0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical pregnancy rate per OPU in the IVF group was higher than the one in IUI group (20.6% <i>vs</i>. 10.1%), and the difference was significant (p<0.01). The pregnancy rate for natural cycle IVF calculated per fresh ET was 36.8%. The miscarriage rate did not significantly differ between the IVF (4.1%) and IUI (8.0%) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fresh ET in natural cycle IVF provides a higher implantation rate than IUI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"93-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ef/f2/JRI-23-93.PMC9363904.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v23i2.8993.\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v23i2.8993.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:本研究的目的是比较新鲜胚胎移植(ET)自然周期体外受精(IVF)和宫内人工授精(IUI)中卵母细胞提取(OPU)的妊娠结局。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,于2017年4月至2018年2月在日本东京新宿杉山诊所生殖医学和着床研究中心进行,研究对象是接受IUI (n=246)或OPU (n=291)进行自然周期IVF的女性。两组患者均未接受卵巢刺激和黄体支持;在OPU或IUI前35小时给予促性腺激素释放激动剂喷雾。比较IUI组和IVF组的临床妊娠率。数据分析基于循环次数。p≦0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:IVF组临床每OPU妊娠率高于IUI组(20.6% vs. 10.1%),差异有统计学意义(p结论:自然周期IVF中Fresh ET的着床率高于IUI。
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Fresh Embryo Transfer in a Natural IVF Cycle and IUI Cycle Among Infertile Young Women.
Background: The purpose of the current study was comparing pregnancy outcomes for natural cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) per fresh embryo transfer (ET) and oocyte pick-up (OPU) in intrauterine insemination (IUI).
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent either IUI (n=246) or OPU with fresh ET for natural cycle IVF (n=291), conducted between April 2017 and February 2018 at the Center for Reproductive Medicine and Implantation Research, Sugiyama Clinic Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan. Patients in both groups did not receive ovarian stimulation and luteal support; gonadotropin-releasing agonist spray was administered 35 hr before OPU or IUI. The clinical pregnancy rate was compared between the IUI and IVF groups. Data analysis was based on the number of cycles. The p≦0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The clinical pregnancy rate per OPU in the IVF group was higher than the one in IUI group (20.6% vs. 10.1%), and the difference was significant (p<0.01). The pregnancy rate for natural cycle IVF calculated per fresh ET was 36.8%. The miscarriage rate did not significantly differ between the IVF (4.1%) and IUI (8.0%) groups.
Conclusion: Fresh ET in natural cycle IVF provides a higher implantation rate than IUI.