根据病变的大小和弹性,剪切波弹性成像的准确性和可重复性:一项幻影研究。

Harim Kim, Haejung Kim, Boo-Kyung Han, Ji Soo Choi, Eun Sook Ko, Eun Young Ko
{"title":"根据病变的大小和弹性,剪切波弹性成像的准确性和可重复性:一项幻影研究。","authors":"Harim Kim,&nbsp;Haejung Kim,&nbsp;Boo-Kyung Han,&nbsp;Ji Soo Choi,&nbsp;Eun Sook Ko,&nbsp;Eun Young Ko","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000031095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the extrinsic factors affecting reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) have been well documented, there are few resources assessing intrinsic characteristics of the lesion affecting the reproducibility and accuracy of SWE. In this regard, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of measured elasticity and the reproducibility of SWE according to the lesion size and stiffness. Two breast radiologists examined 20 targets of 4 different levels of stiffness and 5 different sizes (2.5, 4, 7, 11, and 18 mm) in a customized elasticity phantom. The B-mode image, color elastography image, and kPa measurement were obtained twice by each examiner with a 1-week interval. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and the accuracy of measured kPa were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analysis was run to evaluate the effect of lesion size and stiffness on the reproducibility and accuracy of measured kPa. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for measuring kPa showed excellent agreement (ICC: 0.9742 and 0.9582; ICC: 0.9932 and 0.9294). The size and stiffness of the targets did not affect reproducibility. The overall accuracy of measured kPa was very high (ICC: 0.8049). In the subgroup analysis, targets that were ≤4 mm in size showed lower accuracy (ICC: 0.542), whereas targets that were 7 and 11 mm in size showed higher accuracy (ICC: 0.9832 and 0.9656, respectively). SWE shows excellent reproducibility regardless of lesion size or stiffness in phantom targets. The accuracy of measured kPa is high in lesions that are 7 and 11 mm in size but is low in lesions that are ≤4 mm in size.</p>","PeriodicalId":508590,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e31095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and reproducibility of shear wave elastography according to the size and elasticity of lesions: A phantom study.\",\"authors\":\"Harim Kim,&nbsp;Haejung Kim,&nbsp;Boo-Kyung Han,&nbsp;Ji Soo Choi,&nbsp;Eun Sook Ko,&nbsp;Eun Young Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000031095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While the extrinsic factors affecting reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) have been well documented, there are few resources assessing intrinsic characteristics of the lesion affecting the reproducibility and accuracy of SWE. In this regard, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of measured elasticity and the reproducibility of SWE according to the lesion size and stiffness. Two breast radiologists examined 20 targets of 4 different levels of stiffness and 5 different sizes (2.5, 4, 7, 11, and 18 mm) in a customized elasticity phantom. The B-mode image, color elastography image, and kPa measurement were obtained twice by each examiner with a 1-week interval. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and the accuracy of measured kPa were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analysis was run to evaluate the effect of lesion size and stiffness on the reproducibility and accuracy of measured kPa. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for measuring kPa showed excellent agreement (ICC: 0.9742 and 0.9582; ICC: 0.9932 and 0.9294). The size and stiffness of the targets did not affect reproducibility. The overall accuracy of measured kPa was very high (ICC: 0.8049). In the subgroup analysis, targets that were ≤4 mm in size showed lower accuracy (ICC: 0.542), whereas targets that were 7 and 11 mm in size showed higher accuracy (ICC: 0.9832 and 0.9656, respectively). SWE shows excellent reproducibility regardless of lesion size or stiffness in phantom targets. The accuracy of measured kPa is high in lesions that are 7 and 11 mm in size but is low in lesions that are ≤4 mm in size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":508590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e31095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然影响剪切波弹性成像(SWE)再现性的外在因素已经被很好地记录下来,但很少有资源评估影响剪切波弹性成像再现性和准确性的病变的内在特征。因此,本研究旨在根据病变的大小和刚度来评估弹性测量的准确性和SWE的重复性。两名乳腺放射科医生在定制的弹性模型中检查了20个4种不同硬度水平和5种不同尺寸(2.5、4、7、11和18毫米)的目标。每个审查员每隔一周获得两次b型图像、彩色弹性成像和kPa测量。使用类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析分析观察者间和观察者内的重复性和测量kPa的准确性。亚组分析评估病变大小和刚度对测量kPa的重复性和准确性的影响。测量kPa的观察者间和观察者内重现性表现出极好的一致性(ICC: 0.9742和0.9582;ICC: 0.9932和0.9294)。靶材的尺寸和刚度不影响再现性。所测kPa的总体精度非常高(ICC: 0.8049)。在亚组分析中,尺寸≤4 mm的靶精度较低(ICC: 0.542),尺寸为7 mm和11 mm的靶精度较高(ICC: 0.9832和0.9656)。SWE显示了极好的再现性,无论病变大小或刚度的幻影目标。对于尺寸为7和11mm的病变,测量kPa的准确性较高,但对于尺寸≤4mm的病变,测量kPa的准确性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Accuracy and reproducibility of shear wave elastography according to the size and elasticity of lesions: A phantom study.

Accuracy and reproducibility of shear wave elastography according to the size and elasticity of lesions: A phantom study.

Accuracy and reproducibility of shear wave elastography according to the size and elasticity of lesions: A phantom study.

Accuracy and reproducibility of shear wave elastography according to the size and elasticity of lesions: A phantom study.

While the extrinsic factors affecting reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) have been well documented, there are few resources assessing intrinsic characteristics of the lesion affecting the reproducibility and accuracy of SWE. In this regard, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of measured elasticity and the reproducibility of SWE according to the lesion size and stiffness. Two breast radiologists examined 20 targets of 4 different levels of stiffness and 5 different sizes (2.5, 4, 7, 11, and 18 mm) in a customized elasticity phantom. The B-mode image, color elastography image, and kPa measurement were obtained twice by each examiner with a 1-week interval. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and the accuracy of measured kPa were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analysis was run to evaluate the effect of lesion size and stiffness on the reproducibility and accuracy of measured kPa. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for measuring kPa showed excellent agreement (ICC: 0.9742 and 0.9582; ICC: 0.9932 and 0.9294). The size and stiffness of the targets did not affect reproducibility. The overall accuracy of measured kPa was very high (ICC: 0.8049). In the subgroup analysis, targets that were ≤4 mm in size showed lower accuracy (ICC: 0.542), whereas targets that were 7 and 11 mm in size showed higher accuracy (ICC: 0.9832 and 0.9656, respectively). SWE shows excellent reproducibility regardless of lesion size or stiffness in phantom targets. The accuracy of measured kPa is high in lesions that are 7 and 11 mm in size but is low in lesions that are ≤4 mm in size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信