全麻与常规门诊治疗儿童早期严重龋的疗效及卫生经济学评价。

Q3 Medicine
Ya Qi Liu, Qiong Zhang, Yan Wang, Xing Qu, Jing Zou
{"title":"全麻与常规门诊治疗儿童早期严重龋的疗效及卫生经济学评价。","authors":"Ya Qi Liu, Qiong Zhang, Yan Wang, Xing Qu, Jing Zou","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and health economics of the comprehensive therapy for the children with severe early child caries (S-ECC) under dental general anesthesia (DGA) and conventional outpatient treatment to provide references for dentists and parents in the choice of clinical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on S-ECC children aged 36-71 months and who received dental treatment under general anesthesia or routine outpatient situation. The filled tooth survival rate, treatment cost, and cost-filled tooth survival time of the two groups were compared, and the curative effect and health economics was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The filled tooth survival rate of the DGA group was higher than that of the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05). The average direct medical cost per filled tooth was significantly higher in the DGA group than in the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05). The direct medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio in the DGA group was higher than that in the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the conventional outpatient treatment group, the treatment outcomes of S-ECC under general anesthesia were better, and the costs were higher. However, no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time between these two groups, and the conventional outpatient treatment did not have evident economic advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":35800,"journal":{"name":"华西口腔医学杂志","volume":"39 6","pages":"703-708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703095/pdf/wcjs-39-06-703.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of therapeutic effect and health economics of general anesthesia and routine outpatient dental treatment in children with severe early child caries.\",\"authors\":\"Ya Qi Liu, Qiong Zhang, Yan Wang, Xing Qu, Jing Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and health economics of the comprehensive therapy for the children with severe early child caries (S-ECC) under dental general anesthesia (DGA) and conventional outpatient treatment to provide references for dentists and parents in the choice of clinical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on S-ECC children aged 36-71 months and who received dental treatment under general anesthesia or routine outpatient situation. The filled tooth survival rate, treatment cost, and cost-filled tooth survival time of the two groups were compared, and the curative effect and health economics was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The filled tooth survival rate of the DGA group was higher than that of the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05). The average direct medical cost per filled tooth was significantly higher in the DGA group than in the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05). The direct medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio in the DGA group was higher than that in the routine outpatient group (<i>P</i><0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the conventional outpatient treatment group, the treatment outcomes of S-ECC under general anesthesia were better, and the costs were higher. However, no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time between these two groups, and the conventional outpatient treatment did not have evident economic advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"华西口腔医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"703-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8703095/pdf/wcjs-39-06-703.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"华西口腔医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"华西口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价牙科全麻(DGA)和常规门诊综合治疗儿童重度早期龋齿(S-ECC)的疗效和健康经济性,为牙医和家长选择临床治疗提供参考。方法:对36-71个月的S-ECC儿童进行回顾性队列研究,这些儿童在全麻或常规门诊情况下接受牙科治疗。比较两组充填牙成活率、治疗费用、充填牙成活时间,评价疗效和健康经济性。结果:DGA组充填牙成活率高于常规门诊组(PPPP>0.05)。结论:与常规门诊治疗组相比,全麻下S-ECC的治疗效果更好,费用更高。然而,这两组患者的总医疗费用填充牙齿存活时间没有显著差异,常规门诊治疗也没有明显的经济优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of therapeutic effect and health economics of general anesthesia and routine outpatient dental treatment in children with severe early child caries.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and health economics of the comprehensive therapy for the children with severe early child caries (S-ECC) under dental general anesthesia (DGA) and conventional outpatient treatment to provide references for dentists and parents in the choice of clinical treatment.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on S-ECC children aged 36-71 months and who received dental treatment under general anesthesia or routine outpatient situation. The filled tooth survival rate, treatment cost, and cost-filled tooth survival time of the two groups were compared, and the curative effect and health economics was evaluated.

Results: The filled tooth survival rate of the DGA group was higher than that of the routine outpatient group (P<0.05). The average direct medical cost per filled tooth was significantly higher in the DGA group than in the routine outpatient group (P<0.05). The direct medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio in the DGA group was higher than that in the routine outpatient group (P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Compared with the conventional outpatient treatment group, the treatment outcomes of S-ECC under general anesthesia were better, and the costs were higher. However, no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time between these two groups, and the conventional outpatient treatment did not have evident economic advantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
华西口腔医学杂志
华西口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6397
期刊介绍: West China Journal of Stomatology (WCJS, pISSN 1000-1182, eISSN 2618-0456, CN 51-1169/R), published bimonthly, is a peer-reviewed Open Access journal, hosted by Sichuan university and Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. WCJS was established in 1983 and indexed in Medline/Pubmed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, Chemical Abstract(CA), CNKI, WANFANG Data, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信