基于图片的记忆障碍筛查在脑卒中患者中的初步应用研究。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2021.2021411
Xiao Fei, Yi Zhang, Yun Cheng, Yu Zhang, Jing Guo
{"title":"基于图片的记忆障碍筛查在脑卒中患者中的初步应用研究。","authors":"Xiao Fei, Yi Zhang, Yun Cheng, Yu Zhang, Jing Guo","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2021.2021411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b> The objective was to explore the validity and reliability of the Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen (PMIS) assessment tool in stroke patients and to provide an objective basis for its application in China.<b>Methods:</b> A total of 30 stroke patients in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the PMIS. The results were evaluated by content validity, simultaneous validity, consistency test of instruments of assessment, inter-scorer reliability, and retest reliability.<b>Results:</b> The correlation coefficient between each item score and total score of PMIS was between 0.422 and 0.778 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), showing good content validity. The total score of PMIS was moderately positively correlated with the MMSE short-term memory score (<i>p</i> < 0.001), highly positively correlated with the MMSE long-term memory score and retrospective memory score (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and highly positively correlated with the MoCA long-term memory score, memory index and total score (<i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating good criterion validity. The consistency test of the two instruments of assessment showed that a PMIS ≤ 5 was used as the demarcation score for dementia, and it was tested for consistency with the MMSE dementia score of stroke patients, and the Kappa value was 0.81 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The inter-scorer reliability and retest reliability were good (inter-scorer reliability intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.95; retest reliability ICC 0.904).<b>Conclusion:</b> The PMIS was a reliable and valid assessment tool, which can be used as memory impairment screening tool for stroke patients in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"311-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the application of Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen in stroke patients in a preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Fei, Yi Zhang, Yun Cheng, Yu Zhang, Jing Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2021.2021411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b> The objective was to explore the validity and reliability of the Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen (PMIS) assessment tool in stroke patients and to provide an objective basis for its application in China.<b>Methods:</b> A total of 30 stroke patients in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the PMIS. The results were evaluated by content validity, simultaneous validity, consistency test of instruments of assessment, inter-scorer reliability, and retest reliability.<b>Results:</b> The correlation coefficient between each item score and total score of PMIS was between 0.422 and 0.778 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), showing good content validity. The total score of PMIS was moderately positively correlated with the MMSE short-term memory score (<i>p</i> < 0.001), highly positively correlated with the MMSE long-term memory score and retrospective memory score (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and highly positively correlated with the MoCA long-term memory score, memory index and total score (<i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating good criterion validity. The consistency test of the two instruments of assessment showed that a PMIS ≤ 5 was used as the demarcation score for dementia, and it was tested for consistency with the MMSE dementia score of stroke patients, and the Kappa value was 0.81 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The inter-scorer reliability and retest reliability were good (inter-scorer reliability intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.95; retest reliability ICC 0.904).<b>Conclusion:</b> The PMIS was a reliable and valid assessment tool, which can be used as memory impairment screening tool for stroke patients in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"311-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2021411\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2021411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 探讨基于图像的记忆障碍筛查(PMIS)评估工具在脑卒中患者中的有效性和可靠性,为其在中国的应用提供客观依据:方法:对康复医学科的 30 名脑卒中患者使用迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和 PMIS 进行评估。评估结果通过内容效度、同步效度、评估工具一致性测试、评分者间信度和重测信度进行评价:PMIS 各项目得分与总分之间的相关系数介于 0.422 与 0.778 之间(p p p p p 0.95;重测信度 ICC 0.904):PMIS是一个可靠有效的评估工具,可作为中国脑卒中患者记忆障碍筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of the application of Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen in stroke patients in a preliminary study.

Objective The objective was to explore the validity and reliability of the Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen (PMIS) assessment tool in stroke patients and to provide an objective basis for its application in China.Methods: A total of 30 stroke patients in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the PMIS. The results were evaluated by content validity, simultaneous validity, consistency test of instruments of assessment, inter-scorer reliability, and retest reliability.Results: The correlation coefficient between each item score and total score of PMIS was between 0.422 and 0.778 (p < 0.05), showing good content validity. The total score of PMIS was moderately positively correlated with the MMSE short-term memory score (p < 0.001), highly positively correlated with the MMSE long-term memory score and retrospective memory score (p < 0.001), and highly positively correlated with the MoCA long-term memory score, memory index and total score (p < 0.001), indicating good criterion validity. The consistency test of the two instruments of assessment showed that a PMIS ≤ 5 was used as the demarcation score for dementia, and it was tested for consistency with the MMSE dementia score of stroke patients, and the Kappa value was 0.81 (p < 0.001). The inter-scorer reliability and retest reliability were good (inter-scorer reliability intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.95; retest reliability ICC 0.904).Conclusion: The PMIS was a reliable and valid assessment tool, which can be used as memory impairment screening tool for stroke patients in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信