[桡动脉通路手术后的桡动脉闭塞:比较生态多普勒和逆Barbeau测试评估的初步研究]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Mariangela Alberti, Gabriele Bucca, Alberto Somenzi, Antonio Mellino, Stefania Gamberini, Buono Daniele, Fernanda Giancola, Alice Bonomi, Massimo Moro
{"title":"[桡动脉通路手术后的桡动脉闭塞:比较生态多普勒和逆Barbeau测试评估的初步研究]。","authors":"Mariangela Alberti,&nbsp;Gabriele Bucca,&nbsp;Alberto Somenzi,&nbsp;Antonio Mellino,&nbsp;Stefania Gamberini,&nbsp;Buono Daniele,&nbsp;Fernanda Giancola,&nbsp;Alice Bonomi,&nbsp;Massimo Moro","doi":"10.1702/3743.37260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>. Radial artery occlusion after a radial access procedure: pilot study comparing eco Doppler and Inverse Barbeau Test assessments.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radial artery occlusion (RAO) after a radial access procedure can compromise the distal flow and hamper any possible reuse of the radial artery. Ultrasound examination is the gold standard for identifying RAO, but requires special equipment and expertise. An indirect test to estimate radial flow is the Inverse Barbeau Test (IBT), which evaluates the radial oximetry waveform during ulnar artery compression.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the incidence of RAO and to compare the results obtained with the ultrasound and IBT tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2017 and February 2018, 50 patients undergoing radial access angiography were enrolled. Radial flow was assessed using both ultrasound and IBT, at three times: before the procedure (T0), at 24 hours (T1) and at 30 days (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of RAO obtained by ultrasound was no cases at T0, 3 (6%) at T1 and 1 (2.4%) at T2. IBT identified 14 (28%), 33 (66%) and 10 (23.8%) cases respectively. Some cases with no occlusion with the ultrasounds, 14 (28%), 30 (60%) and 9 (21.4%) respectively, resulted occluded by IBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of RAO is comparable to that reported in the literature (<10%). The IBT correctly identifies the presence of flow, but overestimates radial occlusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":55447,"journal":{"name":"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca","volume":"40 4","pages":"213-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Radial artery occlusion after a radial access procedure: pilot study comparing eco Doppler and Inverse Barbeau Test assessments].\",\"authors\":\"Mariangela Alberti,&nbsp;Gabriele Bucca,&nbsp;Alberto Somenzi,&nbsp;Antonio Mellino,&nbsp;Stefania Gamberini,&nbsp;Buono Daniele,&nbsp;Fernanda Giancola,&nbsp;Alice Bonomi,&nbsp;Massimo Moro\",\"doi\":\"10.1702/3743.37260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>. Radial artery occlusion after a radial access procedure: pilot study comparing eco Doppler and Inverse Barbeau Test assessments.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radial artery occlusion (RAO) after a radial access procedure can compromise the distal flow and hamper any possible reuse of the radial artery. Ultrasound examination is the gold standard for identifying RAO, but requires special equipment and expertise. An indirect test to estimate radial flow is the Inverse Barbeau Test (IBT), which evaluates the radial oximetry waveform during ulnar artery compression.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the incidence of RAO and to compare the results obtained with the ultrasound and IBT tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2017 and February 2018, 50 patients undergoing radial access angiography were enrolled. Radial flow was assessed using both ultrasound and IBT, at three times: before the procedure (T0), at 24 hours (T1) and at 30 days (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of RAO obtained by ultrasound was no cases at T0, 3 (6%) at T1 and 1 (2.4%) at T2. IBT identified 14 (28%), 33 (66%) and 10 (23.8%) cases respectively. Some cases with no occlusion with the ultrasounds, 14 (28%), 30 (60%) and 9 (21.4%) respectively, resulted occluded by IBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of RAO is comparable to that reported in the literature (<10%). The IBT correctly identifies the presence of flow, but overestimates radial occlusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"213-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1702/3743.37260\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1702/3743.37260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

. 桡动脉通路手术后的桡动脉闭塞:比较生态多普勒和逆巴博测试评估的初步研究。简介:桡动脉闭塞(RAO)在桡动脉通路手术后会损害远端血流,阻碍任何可能的桡动脉再利用。超声检查是识别RAO的金标准,但需要特殊的设备和专业知识。一种估算桡动脉血流的间接测试是逆Barbeau测试(IBT),它评估尺动脉受压时的桡动脉血氧波形。目的:探讨急性甲状腺肿的发生率,并与超声和IBT检查结果进行比较。方法:在2017年11月至2018年2月期间,纳入了50例接受桡动脉通道血管造影的患者。采用超声和IBT分别在术前(T0)、24小时(T1)和30天(T2)三次评估径向流量。结果:超声显示的RAO在T0时无发生,T1时3例(6%),T2时1例(2.4%)。IBT分别发现14例(28%)、33例(66%)和10例(23.8%)。超声未发现闭塞的14例(28%)、30例(60%)、9例(21.4%)被IBT阻塞。结论:RAO的发生率与文献报道相当(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Radial artery occlusion after a radial access procedure: pilot study comparing eco Doppler and Inverse Barbeau Test assessments].

. Radial artery occlusion after a radial access procedure: pilot study comparing eco Doppler and Inverse Barbeau Test assessments.

Introduction: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) after a radial access procedure can compromise the distal flow and hamper any possible reuse of the radial artery. Ultrasound examination is the gold standard for identifying RAO, but requires special equipment and expertise. An indirect test to estimate radial flow is the Inverse Barbeau Test (IBT), which evaluates the radial oximetry waveform during ulnar artery compression.

Aim: To determine the incidence of RAO and to compare the results obtained with the ultrasound and IBT tests.

Methods: Between November 2017 and February 2018, 50 patients undergoing radial access angiography were enrolled. Radial flow was assessed using both ultrasound and IBT, at three times: before the procedure (T0), at 24 hours (T1) and at 30 days (T2).

Results: The incidence of RAO obtained by ultrasound was no cases at T0, 3 (6%) at T1 and 1 (2.4%) at T2. IBT identified 14 (28%), 33 (66%) and 10 (23.8%) cases respectively. Some cases with no occlusion with the ultrasounds, 14 (28%), 30 (60%) and 9 (21.4%) respectively, resulted occluded by IBT.

Conclusions: The incidence of RAO is comparable to that reported in the literature (<10%). The IBT correctly identifies the presence of flow, but overestimates radial occlusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca (AIR) è una rivista scientifica che si propone l''obiettivo di promuovere e sviluppare il confronto sulle conoscenze che hanno un impatto sulla pratica, sulla formazione e sulla direzione dell''assistenza infermieristica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信