以爱荷华诉泰勒案为重点的法医病理学专家证词基础。

Q4 Medicine
Academic Forensic Pathology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-07 DOI:10.1177/19253621211060961
Victor W Weedn
{"title":"以爱荷华诉泰勒案为重点的法医病理学专家证词基础。","authors":"Victor W Weedn","doi":"10.1177/19253621211060961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Judicial scrutiny of the forensic sciences is increasing. This scrutiny targets the bases for expert opinions. Forensic pathologists must understand that when they express an opinion it must have an articulable underlying basis. <i>Iowa v Tyler</i> provides a cautionary tale where testimony from a forensic pathologist on the cause and manner of death based exclusively on police reports and audio and video recordings of police interviews of the suspect rather than on medical evidence were held to be inadmissible. <i>Tyler</i> has an odd and distinguishable set of facts, but has been widely cited as an example of problematic forensic pathology testimony.</p>","PeriodicalId":36813,"journal":{"name":"Academic Forensic Pathology","volume":"11 4","pages":"185-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727841/pdf/10.1177_19253621211060961.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bases of Forensic Pathology Expert Testimony With Emphasis on <i>Iowa v Tyler</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Victor W Weedn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19253621211060961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Judicial scrutiny of the forensic sciences is increasing. This scrutiny targets the bases for expert opinions. Forensic pathologists must understand that when they express an opinion it must have an articulable underlying basis. <i>Iowa v Tyler</i> provides a cautionary tale where testimony from a forensic pathologist on the cause and manner of death based exclusively on police reports and audio and video recordings of police interviews of the suspect rather than on medical evidence were held to be inadmissible. <i>Tyler</i> has an odd and distinguishable set of facts, but has been widely cited as an example of problematic forensic pathology testimony.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"185-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727841/pdf/10.1177_19253621211060961.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621211060961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Forensic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621211060961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对法医学的司法审查正在增加。这种审查的目标是专家意见的基础。法医病理学家必须明白,当他们表达意见时,它必须有一个清晰的基础。爱荷华诉泰勒案提供了一个警示性的故事,即法医病理学家仅根据警方报告和警方对嫌疑人面谈的录音和录像提供的关于死亡原因和方式的证词,而不是根据医学证据提供的证词,被认为是不可接受的。泰勒有一组奇怪的、可区分的事实,但被广泛引用为有问题的法医病理学证词的一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bases of Forensic Pathology Expert Testimony With Emphasis on Iowa v Tyler.

Judicial scrutiny of the forensic sciences is increasing. This scrutiny targets the bases for expert opinions. Forensic pathologists must understand that when they express an opinion it must have an articulable underlying basis. Iowa v Tyler provides a cautionary tale where testimony from a forensic pathologist on the cause and manner of death based exclusively on police reports and audio and video recordings of police interviews of the suspect rather than on medical evidence were held to be inadmissible. Tyler has an odd and distinguishable set of facts, but has been widely cited as an example of problematic forensic pathology testimony.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Forensic Pathology
Academic Forensic Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信