犬椎旁臂丛区域阻滞两种盲入路的比较。

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q2 Veterinary
Maria Podsiedlik, Erik H Hofmeister, Tanya Duke-Novakovski
{"title":"犬椎旁臂丛区域阻滞两种盲入路的比较。","authors":"Maria Podsiedlik,&nbsp;Erik H Hofmeister,&nbsp;Tanya Duke-Novakovski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paravertebral brachial plexus block (PVB) provides thoracic limb analgesia. The objective was to describe a blind craniocaudal (CC) approach to the PVB and compare its accuracy, time, and difficulty of performance with a blind dorsoventral (DV) approach. The operator was initially trained by experienced clinicians to perform both approaches on 5 cadavers. Next, a CC or DV approach to the PVB was performed on both thoracic limbs of 20 cadavers (20 for each approach). Methylene blue dye was equally divided into 4 aliquots to stain the ventral branches of the sixth to eighth cervical and first thoracic spinal nerves. Successfully stained (stain ≥ 1 cm) spinal nerves were counted. The time to perform each approach was recorded and ease of performance was scored using a numerical scale (1 \"easy\" to 4 \"difficult\"). The phrenic nerve was checked for stain. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare approaches. The data are presented as median (interquartile range; minimum to maximum range). The number of stained nerves with the CC approach 3 (1; 2 to 4), was higher than the DV approach 2 (2; 0 to 4) (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The time (in seconds) to perform the CC approach 125 (79; 70 to 194), was not different from the DV approach 142 (54; 101 to 232) (<i>P</i> = 0.084). The CC approach 2 (2; 1 to 4) was easier to perform than the DV approach 3 (1; 2 to 4) (<i>P</i> = 0.024). No phrenic nerve staining was observed with either approach. The CC approach is an alternative to the DV approach for performing the PVB in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9550,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","volume":" ","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697322/pdf/cjvr_01_20.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 2 blind approaches to the paravertebral brachial plexus regional block in canine cadavers.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Podsiedlik,&nbsp;Erik H Hofmeister,&nbsp;Tanya Duke-Novakovski\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The paravertebral brachial plexus block (PVB) provides thoracic limb analgesia. The objective was to describe a blind craniocaudal (CC) approach to the PVB and compare its accuracy, time, and difficulty of performance with a blind dorsoventral (DV) approach. The operator was initially trained by experienced clinicians to perform both approaches on 5 cadavers. Next, a CC or DV approach to the PVB was performed on both thoracic limbs of 20 cadavers (20 for each approach). Methylene blue dye was equally divided into 4 aliquots to stain the ventral branches of the sixth to eighth cervical and first thoracic spinal nerves. Successfully stained (stain ≥ 1 cm) spinal nerves were counted. The time to perform each approach was recorded and ease of performance was scored using a numerical scale (1 \\\"easy\\\" to 4 \\\"difficult\\\"). The phrenic nerve was checked for stain. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare approaches. The data are presented as median (interquartile range; minimum to maximum range). The number of stained nerves with the CC approach 3 (1; 2 to 4), was higher than the DV approach 2 (2; 0 to 4) (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The time (in seconds) to perform the CC approach 125 (79; 70 to 194), was not different from the DV approach 142 (54; 101 to 232) (<i>P</i> = 0.084). The CC approach 2 (2; 1 to 4) was easier to perform than the DV approach 3 (1; 2 to 4) (<i>P</i> = 0.024). No phrenic nerve staining was observed with either approach. The CC approach is an alternative to the DV approach for performing the PVB in dogs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697322/pdf/cjvr_01_20.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

椎旁臂丛阻滞(PVB)提供胸肢镇痛。目的是描述盲颅侧(CC)入路到PVB,并比较其准确性、时间和难度与盲背侧(DV)入路。操作者最初由经验丰富的临床医生培训,在5具尸体上使用这两种方法。接下来,在20具尸体的双胸肢上进行CC或DV入路PVB(每种入路20例)。亚甲蓝染料等分4份染色第6 ~第8颈脊神经和第1胸脊神经腹侧支。染色成功(染色≥1 cm)的脊神经计数。记录执行每种方法的时间,并使用数字量表(1“容易”到4“困难”)对执行的难易程度进行评分。检查膈神经有无染色。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较方法。数据以中位数(四分位数范围;最小到最大范围)。CC接近染色神经数3 (1;2 ~ 4),高于DV方法2 (2;0 ~ 4) (P = 0.002)。执行CC方法的时间(以秒为单位)125 (79;70 ~ 194),与DV方法142 (54;101 ~ 232) (P = 0.084)。CC方法2 (2;1 ~ 4)比DV法3 (1;2 ~ 4) (P = 0.024)。两种入路均未见膈神经染色。CC方法是一种替代DV方法执行PVB在狗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of 2 blind approaches to the paravertebral brachial plexus regional block in canine cadavers.

The paravertebral brachial plexus block (PVB) provides thoracic limb analgesia. The objective was to describe a blind craniocaudal (CC) approach to the PVB and compare its accuracy, time, and difficulty of performance with a blind dorsoventral (DV) approach. The operator was initially trained by experienced clinicians to perform both approaches on 5 cadavers. Next, a CC or DV approach to the PVB was performed on both thoracic limbs of 20 cadavers (20 for each approach). Methylene blue dye was equally divided into 4 aliquots to stain the ventral branches of the sixth to eighth cervical and first thoracic spinal nerves. Successfully stained (stain ≥ 1 cm) spinal nerves were counted. The time to perform each approach was recorded and ease of performance was scored using a numerical scale (1 "easy" to 4 "difficult"). The phrenic nerve was checked for stain. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare approaches. The data are presented as median (interquartile range; minimum to maximum range). The number of stained nerves with the CC approach 3 (1; 2 to 4), was higher than the DV approach 2 (2; 0 to 4) (P = 0.002). The time (in seconds) to perform the CC approach 125 (79; 70 to 194), was not different from the DV approach 142 (54; 101 to 232) (P = 0.084). The CC approach 2 (2; 1 to 4) was easier to perform than the DV approach 3 (1; 2 to 4) (P = 0.024). No phrenic nerve staining was observed with either approach. The CC approach is an alternative to the DV approach for performing the PVB in dogs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, published by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association, is Canada''s only veterinary research publication. This quarterly peer-reviewed online-only journal has earned a wide international readership through the publishing of high quality scientific papers in the field of veterinary medicine. The Journal publishes the results of original research in veterinary and comparative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信