在老年护理环境中使用远程呈现机器人的促进因素和障碍:范围审查。

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Lillian Hung, Joey Wong, Chelsea Smith, Annette Berndt, Mario Gregorio, Neil Horne, Lynn Jackson, Jim Mann, Mineko Wada, Erika Young
{"title":"在老年护理环境中使用远程呈现机器人的促进因素和障碍:范围审查。","authors":"Lillian Hung,&nbsp;Joey Wong,&nbsp;Chelsea Smith,&nbsp;Annette Berndt,&nbsp;Mario Gregorio,&nbsp;Neil Horne,&nbsp;Lynn Jackson,&nbsp;Jim Mann,&nbsp;Mineko Wada,&nbsp;Erika Young","doi":"10.1177/20556683211072385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social isolation has been a significant issue in aged care settings, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and is associated with adverse outcomes, including loneliness, depression, and cognitive decline. While robotic assistance may help mitigate social isolation, it would be helpful to know how to adopt technology in aged care. This scoping review aims to explore facilitators and barriers to the implementation of telepresence robots in aged care settings. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews reporting guidelines, we searched relevant peer-reviewed studies through eight databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PsychINFO (EBSCO), Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. Google was used to search gray literature, including descriptive, evaluative, quantitative, and qualitative designs. Eligibility includes: studies with people aged 65 years and older who interacted with a telepresence robot in a care setting, and articles written in English. We conducted a thematic analysis to summarize the evidence based on the constructs in the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Of 1183 articles retrieved, 13 were included in the final review. The analysis yielded three themes: relative advantages, perceived risks and problems, and contextual considerations. The key facilitators to telepresence robot adoption are as follows: a feeling of physical presence, ease of use, mobility, and training. The barriers to implementation are as follows: cost, privacy issues, internet connectivity, and workflow. Future research should investigate the role of leadership support in implementation and practical strategies to overcome barriers to technology adoption in aged care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785274/pdf/","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators and barriers to using telepresence robots in aged care settings: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Lillian Hung,&nbsp;Joey Wong,&nbsp;Chelsea Smith,&nbsp;Annette Berndt,&nbsp;Mario Gregorio,&nbsp;Neil Horne,&nbsp;Lynn Jackson,&nbsp;Jim Mann,&nbsp;Mineko Wada,&nbsp;Erika Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20556683211072385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social isolation has been a significant issue in aged care settings, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and is associated with adverse outcomes, including loneliness, depression, and cognitive decline. While robotic assistance may help mitigate social isolation, it would be helpful to know how to adopt technology in aged care. This scoping review aims to explore facilitators and barriers to the implementation of telepresence robots in aged care settings. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews reporting guidelines, we searched relevant peer-reviewed studies through eight databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PsychINFO (EBSCO), Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. Google was used to search gray literature, including descriptive, evaluative, quantitative, and qualitative designs. Eligibility includes: studies with people aged 65 years and older who interacted with a telepresence robot in a care setting, and articles written in English. We conducted a thematic analysis to summarize the evidence based on the constructs in the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Of 1183 articles retrieved, 13 were included in the final review. The analysis yielded three themes: relative advantages, perceived risks and problems, and contextual considerations. The key facilitators to telepresence robot adoption are as follows: a feeling of physical presence, ease of use, mobility, and training. The barriers to implementation are as follows: cost, privacy issues, internet connectivity, and workflow. Future research should investigate the role of leadership support in implementation and practical strategies to overcome barriers to technology adoption in aged care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785274/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211072385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211072385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

社会隔离一直是老年护理环境中的一个重大问题,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,它与孤独、抑郁和认知能力下降等不良后果有关。虽然机器人辅助可能有助于减轻社会孤立,但了解如何在老年护理中采用技术将会有所帮助。这一范围审查的目的是探讨在老年护理设置实施远程呈现机器人的促进因素和障碍。按照Joanna Briggs研究所的范围评审方法和PRISMA扩展的范围评审报告指南,我们通过8个数据库检索了相关的同行评审研究:CINAHL、MEDLINE、Cochrane、PsychINFO (EBSCO)、Web of Science、ProQuest disserthesis and Theses Global、IEEE explore和ACM Digital Library。使用Google搜索灰色文献,包括描述性、评价性、定量和定性设计。资格包括:65岁及以上的老年人在护理环境中与远程呈现机器人互动的研究,以及用英语写的文章。我们根据《实施研究综合框架》中的构建进行了专题分析,以总结证据。在检索到的1183篇文章中,有13篇被纳入最终评审。分析产生了三个主题:相对优势、感知到的风险和问题,以及背景考虑。远程呈现机器人采用的关键促进因素如下:物理存在的感觉,易于使用,移动性和培训。实现的障碍如下:成本、隐私问题、互联网连接和工作流程。未来的研究应探讨领导支持在实施中的作用,以及在老年护理环境中克服技术采用障碍的实际策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Facilitators and barriers to using telepresence robots in aged care settings: A scoping review.

Facilitators and barriers to using telepresence robots in aged care settings: A scoping review.

Facilitators and barriers to using telepresence robots in aged care settings: A scoping review.

Facilitators and barriers to using telepresence robots in aged care settings: A scoping review.

Social isolation has been a significant issue in aged care settings, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and is associated with adverse outcomes, including loneliness, depression, and cognitive decline. While robotic assistance may help mitigate social isolation, it would be helpful to know how to adopt technology in aged care. This scoping review aims to explore facilitators and barriers to the implementation of telepresence robots in aged care settings. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews reporting guidelines, we searched relevant peer-reviewed studies through eight databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PsychINFO (EBSCO), Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. Google was used to search gray literature, including descriptive, evaluative, quantitative, and qualitative designs. Eligibility includes: studies with people aged 65 years and older who interacted with a telepresence robot in a care setting, and articles written in English. We conducted a thematic analysis to summarize the evidence based on the constructs in the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research. Of 1183 articles retrieved, 13 were included in the final review. The analysis yielded three themes: relative advantages, perceived risks and problems, and contextual considerations. The key facilitators to telepresence robot adoption are as follows: a feeling of physical presence, ease of use, mobility, and training. The barriers to implementation are as follows: cost, privacy issues, internet connectivity, and workflow. Future research should investigate the role of leadership support in implementation and practical strategies to overcome barriers to technology adoption in aged care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信