非阻塞性基线肺活量测定成人FEF25-75%降低与乙酰胆碱激发试验阳性的相关性

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-29 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6959322
Irfan Shafiq, Mateen Haider Uzbeck, Zaid Zoumot, Mohamed Abuzakouk, Niyas Parappurath, Ali Saeed Wahla
{"title":"非阻塞性基线肺活量测定成人FEF25-75%降低与乙酰胆碱激发试验阳性的相关性","authors":"Irfan Shafiq,&nbsp;Mateen Haider Uzbeck,&nbsp;Zaid Zoumot,&nbsp;Mohamed Abuzakouk,&nbsp;Niyas Parappurath,&nbsp;Ali Saeed Wahla","doi":"10.1155/2021/6959322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify whether in adults with a nonobstructive spirometry a reduced FEF25-75% is associated with a positive methacholine challenge test (MCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected for all the patients who had a MCT done between April 2014 and January 2020 but had nonobstructive baseline spirometry. Logistic regression was utilized to estimate the log odds of a positive methacholine test as a function of FEF25-75% and also for age, gender, BMI, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 496 patients, 187 (38%) had a positive MCT. Baseline characteristics in two groups were similar except that patients with positive MCT were younger (32 ± 11.57 vs. 38 ± 13.25 years, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean FEF25-75% was lower in MCT positive (3.12 ± 0.99 L/s) vs. MCT negative (3.39 ± 0.97 L/s) patients, <i>p</i> = 0.003. Logistic regression results suggest that MCT outcome is inversely related to FEF25-75%, age, and gender. Specifically, as FEF25-75% percentage of predicted value increases, the log odds of a positive MCT decrease (odds ratio (OR) = 0.90, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.84-0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Also, as age increases, the log odds of a positive MCT decrease (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.94-0.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduced FEF25-75% in adults with nonobstructive spirometry can predict a positive response to MCT in younger patients. However, this relationship becomes weaker with increasing age.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8731260/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between Reduced FEF25-75% and a Positive Methacholine Challenge Test in Adults with Nonobstructive Baseline Spirometry.\",\"authors\":\"Irfan Shafiq,&nbsp;Mateen Haider Uzbeck,&nbsp;Zaid Zoumot,&nbsp;Mohamed Abuzakouk,&nbsp;Niyas Parappurath,&nbsp;Ali Saeed Wahla\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/6959322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To clarify whether in adults with a nonobstructive spirometry a reduced FEF25-75% is associated with a positive methacholine challenge test (MCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected for all the patients who had a MCT done between April 2014 and January 2020 but had nonobstructive baseline spirometry. Logistic regression was utilized to estimate the log odds of a positive methacholine test as a function of FEF25-75% and also for age, gender, BMI, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 496 patients, 187 (38%) had a positive MCT. Baseline characteristics in two groups were similar except that patients with positive MCT were younger (32 ± 11.57 vs. 38 ± 13.25 years, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean FEF25-75% was lower in MCT positive (3.12 ± 0.99 L/s) vs. MCT negative (3.39 ± 0.97 L/s) patients, <i>p</i> = 0.003. Logistic regression results suggest that MCT outcome is inversely related to FEF25-75%, age, and gender. Specifically, as FEF25-75% percentage of predicted value increases, the log odds of a positive MCT decrease (odds ratio (OR) = 0.90, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.84-0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Also, as age increases, the log odds of a positive MCT decrease (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.94-0.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduced FEF25-75% in adults with nonobstructive spirometry can predict a positive response to MCT in younger patients. However, this relationship becomes weaker with increasing age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8731260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6959322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6959322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:阐明非阻塞性肺活量测定的成人FEF25-75%降低是否与甲基胆碱激发试验(MCT)阳性相关。方法:收集2014年4月至2020年1月期间接受MCT但进行非阻塞性基线肺活量测定的所有患者的数据。采用Logistic回归估计甲基胆碱试验阳性的对数赔率与FEF25-75%以及年龄、性别、BMI、FEV1和FEV1/FVC的关系。结果:496例患者中,187例(38%)MCT阳性。两组的基线特征相似,除了MCT阳性患者更年轻(分别为32±11.57岁对38±13.25岁,p < 0.001)。MCT阳性患者平均FEF25-75%(3.12±0.99 L/s)低于MCT阴性患者(3.39±0.97 L/s), p = 0.003。Logistic回归结果显示,MCT结果与FEF25-75%、年龄和性别呈负相关。具体而言,随着FEF25-75%的预测值百分比的增加,MCT阳性的对数赔率降低(比值比(OR) = 0.90, 95%置信区间(CI) = 0.84-0.96, p = 0.002)。此外,随着年龄的增加,MCT阳性的对数赔率降低(OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001)。结论:非阻塞性肺活量测定的成人FEF25-75%降低可以预测年轻患者对MCT的阳性反应。然而,这种关系随着年龄的增长而减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Correlation between Reduced FEF25-75% and a Positive Methacholine Challenge Test in Adults with Nonobstructive Baseline Spirometry.

Correlation between Reduced FEF25-75% and a Positive Methacholine Challenge Test in Adults with Nonobstructive Baseline Spirometry.

Correlation between Reduced FEF25-75% and a Positive Methacholine Challenge Test in Adults with Nonobstructive Baseline Spirometry.

Objective: To clarify whether in adults with a nonobstructive spirometry a reduced FEF25-75% is associated with a positive methacholine challenge test (MCT).

Methods: Data was collected for all the patients who had a MCT done between April 2014 and January 2020 but had nonobstructive baseline spirometry. Logistic regression was utilized to estimate the log odds of a positive methacholine test as a function of FEF25-75% and also for age, gender, BMI, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC.

Results: Out of 496 patients, 187 (38%) had a positive MCT. Baseline characteristics in two groups were similar except that patients with positive MCT were younger (32 ± 11.57 vs. 38 ± 13.25 years, respectively, p < 0.001). Mean FEF25-75% was lower in MCT positive (3.12 ± 0.99 L/s) vs. MCT negative (3.39 ± 0.97 L/s) patients, p = 0.003. Logistic regression results suggest that MCT outcome is inversely related to FEF25-75%, age, and gender. Specifically, as FEF25-75% percentage of predicted value increases, the log odds of a positive MCT decrease (odds ratio (OR) = 0.90, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.84-0.96, p = 0.002). Also, as age increases, the log odds of a positive MCT decrease (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Reduced FEF25-75% in adults with nonobstructive spirometry can predict a positive response to MCT in younger patients. However, this relationship becomes weaker with increasing age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信